From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Ziyue Zhang <ziyue.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, johan+linaro@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
kishon@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
abel.vesa@linaro.org, kw@linux.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com,
quic_krichai@quicinc.com, quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PCIe PERST and Wake GPIOs to port nodes
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 21:53:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abdviJbrluDn2Vrx@baldur> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <en5a7jrgpbn4bsmw5qwprugb2qmjkqw2x5eey6jxxu63634duz@b43rhcsqkj3o>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 07:50:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:45:42AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 05:46:18PM +0800, Ziyue Zhang wrote:
> > > Commit 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake
> > > GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports") did not
> > > convert all Hamoa‑based platforms to the new method of defining PERST and
> > > Wake GPIOs in the PCIe root port nodes.
> > >
> > > Without the change PCIe probe will fail. The probe failure happens because
> > > the PHY stays in the controller node while the PERST/Wake GPIOs were moved
> > > to the port nodes.
> > >
> > > This fixes probe failures seen on the following platforms:
> > > - x1-hp-omnibook-x14
> > > - x1-microsoft-denali
> > > - x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x
> > > - x1e80100-medion-sprchrgd-14-s1
> > > - x1p42100-lenovo-thinkbook-16
> > > - x1-asus-zenbook-a14
> > > - x1-crd
> > > - x1-dell-thena
> > >
> > > Fixes: 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports")
> >
> > Are you saying that DTs in the field broke because of some kernel
> > change? That's not supposed to happen. Even though PHY, PERST, and
> > Wake GPIOs should be described in Root Port nodes instead of the Root
> > Complex node in *future* DTs, the kernel is still supposed to accept
> > the old style with them described in the Root Complex node.
> >
>
> This is not related to the driver change. The driver correctly parses all Root
> Port properties either in the Root Complex node (old binding) or Root Port node
> (new binding). But commit 960609b22be5, left converting mentioned board DTS to
> the new binding, leaving those affected platforms in a half baked state i.e.,
> some properties in RC node and some in Root Port node. Driver cannot parse such
> combinations, so it fails correctly so.
>
Are you saying that above listed machines has broken PCIe support in
v7.0-rc?
It seems this is a (partial) revert of 960609b22be5, is this actually
fixing that change, or is it only applicable once some other changes are
applied?
Where should this be merged?
Regards,
Bjorn
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Ziyue Zhang <ziyue.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
konradybcio@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
conor+dt@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, johan+linaro@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
kishon@kernel.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org,
abel.vesa@linaro.org, kw@linux.com,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com,
quic_krichai@quicinc.com, quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PCIe PERST and Wake GPIOs to port nodes
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 21:53:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abdviJbrluDn2Vrx@baldur> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <en5a7jrgpbn4bsmw5qwprugb2qmjkqw2x5eey6jxxu63634duz@b43rhcsqkj3o>
On Sat, Mar 14, 2026 at 07:50:50PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:45:42AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 05:46:18PM +0800, Ziyue Zhang wrote:
> > > Commit 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake
> > > GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports") did not
> > > convert all Hamoa‑based platforms to the new method of defining PERST and
> > > Wake GPIOs in the PCIe root port nodes.
> > >
> > > Without the change PCIe probe will fail. The probe failure happens because
> > > the PHY stays in the controller node while the PERST/Wake GPIOs were moved
> > > to the port nodes.
> > >
> > > This fixes probe failures seen on the following platforms:
> > > - x1-hp-omnibook-x14
> > > - x1-microsoft-denali
> > > - x1e80100-lenovo-yoga-slim7x
> > > - x1e80100-medion-sprchrgd-14-s1
> > > - x1p42100-lenovo-thinkbook-16
> > > - x1-asus-zenbook-a14
> > > - x1-crd
> > > - x1-dell-thena
> > >
> > > Fixes: 960609b22be5 ("arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PHY, PERST, and Wake GPIOs to PCIe port nodes and add port Nodes for all PCIe ports")
> >
> > Are you saying that DTs in the field broke because of some kernel
> > change? That's not supposed to happen. Even though PHY, PERST, and
> > Wake GPIOs should be described in Root Port nodes instead of the Root
> > Complex node in *future* DTs, the kernel is still supposed to accept
> > the old style with them described in the Root Complex node.
> >
>
> This is not related to the driver change. The driver correctly parses all Root
> Port properties either in the Root Complex node (old binding) or Root Port node
> (new binding). But commit 960609b22be5, left converting mentioned board DTS to
> the new binding, leaving those affected platforms in a half baked state i.e.,
> some properties in RC node and some in Root Port node. Driver cannot parse such
> combinations, so it fails correctly so.
>
Are you saying that above listed machines has broken PCIe support in
v7.0-rc?
It seems this is a (partial) revert of 960609b22be5, is this actually
fixing that change, or is it only applicable once some other changes are
applied?
Where should this be merged?
Regards,
Bjorn
> - Mani
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-16 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-13 9:46 [PATCH v1 1/1] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Move PCIe PERST and Wake GPIOs to port nodes Ziyue Zhang
2026-03-13 9:46 ` Ziyue Zhang
2026-03-13 16:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-13 16:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-14 14:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-14 14:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-16 2:53 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2026-03-16 2:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-16 3:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-16 3:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 2:42 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-19 2:42 ` Bjorn Andersson
2026-03-19 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 5:39 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 13:50 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-19 13:50 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-24 6:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-24 6:07 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-24 19:14 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-24 19:14 ` Tobias Heider
2026-03-27 14:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-27 14:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-27 16:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-27 16:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-17 17:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-17 17:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-19 5:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 5:28 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-19 13:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-19 13:12 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-19 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-19 17:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-03-24 5:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-24 5:59 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-03-16 11:16 ` Konrad Dybcio
2026-03-16 11:16 ` Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abdviJbrluDn2Vrx@baldur \
--to=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=abel.vesa@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=qiang.yu@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_vbadigan@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=ziyue.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.