All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daiki Harada <daiky0325@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Daiki Harada <daiky0325@gmail.com>
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 0/2] igb/igc: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:39:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331103924.36422-1-daiky0325@gmail.com> (raw)

This patch set is meant to replace the calls to napi_schedule with
napi_schedule_irqoff as this should help to reduce the interrupt overhead
slightly by removing the unneeded call to local_irq_save and
local_irq_restore.

In the interrupt path, callers of napi_schedule() are invoked with local
IRQ disabled, so napi_schedule_irqoff() can be used instead.

This series applies the same optimization that was done for other drivers
in [1] to the igb/igc driver.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20150929215117.3388.48642.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22/ [1]

Daiki Harada (2):
  igb: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()
  igc: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()

 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 6 +++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.53.0


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daiki Harada <daiky0325@gmail.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Daiki Harada <daiky0325@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH iwl-next v1 0/2] igb/igc: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:39:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260331103924.36422-1-daiky0325@gmail.com> (raw)

This patch set is meant to replace the calls to napi_schedule with
napi_schedule_irqoff as this should help to reduce the interrupt overhead
slightly by removing the unneeded call to local_irq_save and
local_irq_restore.

In the interrupt path, callers of napi_schedule() are invoked with local
IRQ disabled, so napi_schedule_irqoff() can be used instead.

This series applies the same optimization that was done for other drivers
in [1] to the igb/igc driver.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-wired-lan/20150929215117.3388.48642.stgit@ahduyck-vm-fedora22/ [1]

Daiki Harada (2):
  igb: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()
  igc: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()

 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 6 +++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 6 +++---
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

-- 
2.53.0


             reply	other threads:[~2026-03-31 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-31 10:39 Daiki Harada [this message]
2026-03-31 10:39 ` [PATCH iwl-next v1 0/2] igb/igc: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule() Daiki Harada
2026-03-31 10:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/2] igb: " Daiki Harada
2026-03-31 10:39   ` Daiki Harada
2026-04-01  7:52   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-01  7:52     ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-05-12  6:16   ` Rinitha, SX
2026-05-12  6:16     ` Rinitha, SX
2026-03-31 10:39 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 2/2] igc: " Daiki Harada
2026-03-31 10:39   ` Daiki Harada
2026-04-01  7:53   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-01  7:53     ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-04-05  8:21     ` Ruinskiy, Dima
2026-05-14  7:38       ` Kadosh, MoriyaX

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260331103924.36422-1-daiky0325@gmail.com \
    --to=daiky0325@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.