[Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v1 1/2] igb: use napi_schedule_irqoff() instead of napi_schedule()

[Daiki Harada <daiky0325@gmail.com>]

Replace napi_schedule() with napi_schedule_irqoff() 
in the interrupt handler path in igb driver

Tested on QEMU with igb NIC emulation (-nic user,model=igb)

Suggested-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
Signed-off-by: Daiki Harada <daiky0325@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
index ee99fd8fd513..d7a6ae938cc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c
@@ -7158,7 +7158,7 @@ static irqreturn_t igb_msix_ring(int irq, void *data)
 	/* Write the ITR value calculated from the previous interrupt. */
 	igb_write_itr(q_vector);
 
-	napi_schedule(&q_vector->napi);
+	napi_schedule_irqoff(&q_vector->napi);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -8199,7 +8199,7 @@ static irqreturn_t igb_intr_msi(int irq, void *data)
 	if (icr & E1000_ICR_TS)
 		igb_tsync_interrupt(adapter);
 
-	napi_schedule(&q_vector->napi);
+	napi_schedule_irqoff(&q_vector->napi);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -8245,7 +8245,7 @@ static irqreturn_t igb_intr(int irq, void *data)
 	if (icr & E1000_ICR_TS)
 		igb_tsync_interrupt(adapter);
 
-	napi_schedule(&q_vector->napi);
+	napi_schedule_irqoff(&q_vector->napi);
 
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
-- 
2.53.0