[PATCH 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_read_1_byte() signature

[PATCH 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_read_1_byte() signature

[Moksh Panicker]

Reformat multi-line function signature to a single line to fix
line length and coding style warnings from checkpatch.pl.

Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
index 803a608b74fa..987d05816c5c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
@@ -41,10 +41,7 @@ rtw_efuse_calculate_word_counts(u8 word_en)
  * 09/23/2008	MHC		Copy from WMAC.
  *
  */
-u8
-rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(
-struct adapter *Adapter,
-u16		Address)
+u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
 {
 	u8 Bytetemp = {0x00};
 	u8 temp = {0x00};
-- 
2.34.1

[PATCH 2/4] staging: rtl8723bs: add braces to else clause in rtw_efuse.c

[Moksh Panicker]

Add missing braces to the else clause to satisfy the coding style
requirement that both arms of an if/else statement use braces.

Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
index 987d05816c5c..2be74f2d4ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
 				break;
 		}
 		return rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL);
-	} else
+	} else {
 		return 0xFF;
 
 } /* rtw_efuse_read_1_byte */
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: rtl8723bs: add braces to else clause in rtw_efuse.c

[Dan Carpenter]

On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:51:02AM +0000, Moksh Panicker wrote:
> Add missing braces to the else clause to satisfy the coding style
> requirement that both arms of an if/else statement use braces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> index 987d05816c5c..2be74f2d4ac8 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
>  				break;
>  		}
>  		return rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL);
> -	} else
> +	} else {
>  		return 0xFF;
>  
>  } /* rtw_efuse_read_1_byte */

Always compile test your code.  Also why did you send this patch
twice?

regards,
dan carpenter

Re: [PATCH 2/4] staging: rtl8723bs: add braces to else clause in rtw_efuse.c

[Moksh Panicker]

Hi Dan,

Apologies for sending it twice. That was due to a mistake in my
send workflow which I have since corrected. I will make sure to
compile test before submitting future patches.

Moksh


On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 10:17 AM Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:51:02AM +0000, Moksh Panicker wrote:
> > Add missing braces to the else clause to satisfy the coding style
> > requirement that both arms of an if/else statement use braces.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> > index 987d05816c5c..2be74f2d4ac8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> > @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
> >                               break;
> >               }
> >               return rtw_read8(Adapter, EFUSE_CTRL);
> > -     } else
> > +     } else {
> >               return 0xFF;
> >
> >  } /* rtw_efuse_read_1_byte */
>
> Always compile test your code.  Also why did you send this patch
> twice?
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>

[PATCH 3/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_one_byte_read() signature

[Moksh Panicker]

Reformat multi-line function signature to a single line to fix
line length and coding style warnings from checkpatch.pl.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605150301.7FuEahpv-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
index 2be74f2d4ac8..ef0cec40d388 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
@@ -79,11 +79,7 @@ u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
 } /* rtw_efuse_read_1_byte */
 
 /*  11/16/2008 MH Read one byte from real Efuse. */
-u8
-rtw_efuse_one_byte_read(
-struct adapter *padapter,
-u16	addr,
-u8	*data)
+u8 rtw_efuse_one_byte_read(struct adapter *padapter, u16 addr, u8 *data)
 {
 	u32 tmpidx = 0;
 	u8 bResult;
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_read_1_byte() signature

[Greg KH]

On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:51:01AM +0000, Moksh Panicker wrote:
> Reformat multi-line function signature to a single line to fix
> line length and coding style warnings from checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> index 803a608b74fa..987d05816c5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> @@ -41,10 +41,7 @@ rtw_efuse_calculate_word_counts(u8 word_en)
>   * 09/23/2008	MHC		Copy from WMAC.
>   *
>   */
> -u8
> -rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(
> -struct adapter *Adapter,
> -u16		Address)
> +u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
>  {
>  	u8 Bytetemp = {0x00};
>  	u8 temp = {0x00};
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

I only see 3 patches here :(

[PATCH 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_read_1_byte() signature

[Moksh Panicker]

Reformat multi-line function signature to a single line to fix
line length and coding style warnings from checkpatch.pl.

Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
index 803a608b74fa..987d05816c5c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
@@ -41,10 +41,7 @@ rtw_efuse_calculate_word_counts(u8 word_en)
  * 09/23/2008	MHC		Copy from WMAC.
  *
  */
-u8
-rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(
-struct adapter *Adapter,
-u16		Address)
+u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
 {
 	u8 Bytetemp = {0x00};
 	u8 temp = {0x00};
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_read_1_byte() signature

[Greg KH]

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 01:33:51AM +0000, Moksh Panicker wrote:
> Reformat multi-line function signature to a single line to fix
> line length and coding style warnings from checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Moksh Panicker <mokshpanicker.7@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c | 5 +----
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> index 803a608b74fa..987d05816c5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_efuse.c
> @@ -41,10 +41,7 @@ rtw_efuse_calculate_word_counts(u8 word_en)
>   * 09/23/2008	MHC		Copy from WMAC.
>   *
>   */
> -u8
> -rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(
> -struct adapter *Adapter,
> -u16		Address)
> +u8 rtw_efuse_read_1_byte(struct adapter *Adapter, u16 Address)
>  {
>  	u8 Bytetemp = {0x00};
>  	u8 temp = {0x00};
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
> 

I only see 3 patches in this series, and it was sent twice?

confused,

greg k-h

Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: rtl8723bs: reformat rtw_efuse_read_1_byte() signature

[Greg KH]

On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 05:37:24PM +0530, Moksh Panicker wrote:
> Apologies for the confusion. I sent a v1 series earlier and then
> resent as v2, both ended up on the list. The [PATCH 1/4] subject
> was a mistake on my part; this is actually a 3-patch series with
> no cover letter. I'll make sure to number them correctly and
> include a cover letter in future submissions.
> 
> Should I resend the series as v3 with the correct numbering
> ([PATCH 1/3], [PATCH 2/3], [PATCH 3/3]) and a [PATCH 0/3](PATCH 0/3 being
> the cover letter)


Yes please.  Also please don't send html email (the lists reject it) and
don't top post :)

thanks,

greg k-h