From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>
To: "Scholz, Kevin" <k-scholz@ti.com>,
Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@ti.com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>,
Franz Schnyder <fra.schnyder@gmail.com>,
"trini@konsulko.com" <trini@konsulko.com>,
"K, Santhosh Kumar" <s-k6@ti.com>, "Brattlof, Bryan" <bb@ti.com>,
"Chawdhry, Manorit" <m-chawdhry@ti.com>,
"u-boot@lists.denx.de" <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
"Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>,
"Gujulan Elango, Hari Prasath" <gehariprasath@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: dts: k3-am69: ddr: Update to v0.12.0 of DDR config tool
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 08:26:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521062615.GB11963@francesco-nb> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <177934243083.132247.2472290729341549059.b4-reply@b4> <8d4936cd5b16494e9447d5f64d7b8e11@ti.com>
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 09:52:09PM +0000, Scholz, Kevin wrote:
> Francesco,
>
> My understanding is that the Aquila board was previously having
> intermittent boot failures, hence the comparison of the TI EVM
> register values vs. the Aquila board register values. My understanding
> is that since then, two unrelated issues were identified resulting in
> the observed behavior, and both have been resolved.
My question has nothing to do with Aquila, I think I was not clear.
> However in general, more than one IO setting can be adequate for a
> given design, and it is also acceptable to have different IO settings
> for different board designs and/or for different DDRSS on the same
> board.
Again, nothing on my question relates to this. My question was
> > specific configuration for AM69A SK board in which only dram3 has ODT
> > enabled, and dram, dram1 and dram2 not. Is the layout/schematics of
> > DRAM3 different from the others? Why?
Why do dram3 is different from dram, dram1 and dram2 on AM69-SK ? Such a
difference implies that the layout is different, or something else. I am
interested in understand what's the reason.
The question is because I want to understand better the TI design.
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 11:17:10AM +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
> On 2026-05-20 21:52:09+00:00, Scholz, Kevin wrote:
> Francesco, hope this justification on the IO settings are satisfactory.
There is no answer to my question.
> Tom, could we pick up this series in that case?
From my point of view you can merge the series. It was like that even
before, I just abused this thread to gather more understanding on the
topic. I see no reason to hold this patch because of this.
Francesco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-03 7:10 [PATCH v2 0/7] ti: j7: Update to v0.12.0 of DDR config tool Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] arm: dts: k3-j7200: ddr: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] arm: dts: k3-j721s2: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm: dts: k3-am68: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm: dts: k3-j784s4: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: dts: k3-am69: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-07 15:44 ` Franz Schnyder
2025-11-10 4:25 ` Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-20 8:16 ` Francesco Dolcini
2025-11-20 14:23 ` [EXTERNAL] " Scholz, Kevin
2025-11-20 14:48 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-04-21 10:10 ` Neha Malcom Francis
2026-05-20 21:52 ` Scholz, Kevin
2026-05-21 5:47 ` Neha Malcom Francis
2026-05-21 6:26 ` Francesco Dolcini [this message]
2026-06-09 4:25 ` Kumar, Udit
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm: dts: k3-j742s2: " Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] doc: ti: k3: Add section for DDR configuration Neha Malcom Francis
2025-11-03 14:35 ` Romain Naour
2026-05-21 5:45 ` Neha Malcom Francis
2026-06-09 19:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] ti: j7: Update to v0.12.0 of DDR config tool Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521062615.GB11963@francesco-nb \
--to=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=bb@ti.com \
--cc=fra.schnyder@gmail.com \
--cc=gehariprasath@ti.com \
--cc=k-scholz@ti.com \
--cc=m-chawdhry@ti.com \
--cc=n-francis@ti.com \
--cc=s-k6@ti.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.