Re: [PATCH v2] docs/devel: relax policy on AI-generated contributions

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 07:06:23PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 29.05.26 um 11:46 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > -Exceptions do not remove the need for authors to comply with all other
> > -requirements for contribution.  In particular, the "Signed-off-by"
> > -label in a patch submission is a statement that the author takes
> > -responsibility for the entire contents of the patch, including any parts
> > -that were generated or assisted by AI tools or other tools.
> > +.. code-block:: none
> > +
> > +     AI-used-for: tests, docs
> > +     AI-used-for: code
> > +     AI-used-for: code (refactoring)
> > +     AI-used-for: code (prototype)
> > +     AI-used-for: research
> > +
> > +``AI-used-for`` should not be included for "background" usage such as
> > +autocomplete or obtaining a pre-review of the patch.
> 
> So what about using AI for security scanning? So how do we want to treat
> a patch from a human that is based on an AI report.

This is ok by the current policy, too.

> And if ok, would we then add something like
> 
> Reported-by: Claude, chatgpt whatever?

-- 
MST