From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 09/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 22:00:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260623220041.06D291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260623012758.2291858-10-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly introduced retry loop logic causes false-positive log pollution for some tests on intermediate failures, while completely stripping necessary failure diagnostics from others.
--
commit d113a5c1702fc8bb852d96d6b5faea6997163754
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests
This commit increases the workload loop counts to 100,000 across three test
sections to guarantee robust branch stack capture during brief benchmark
execution. The iterations were introduced in a retry loop to prevent false
negatives.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> index eb5837f82e390..71550e0b37baa 100755
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/test_brstack.sh
> @@ -110,20 +110,29 @@ test_trap_eret_branches() {
[ ... ]
> - err=0
> - perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u,k -- \
> - perf test -w traploop 1000 > "$TMPDIR/record.txt" 2>&1
> - perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | \
> - tr ' ' '\n' > $TMPDIR/perf.script
> -
> - # BRBINF<n>.TYPE == TRAP are mapped to PERF_BR_IRQ by the BRBE driver
> - check_branches "^trap_bench\+[^ ]+/[^ ]/IRQ/"
> - check_branches "^[^ ]+/trap_bench\+[^ ]+/ERET/"
> - if [ $err -eq 0 ]; then
> + local ret=1
> + for loops in 1000 10000 100000; do
> + err=0
> + perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,save_type,u,k -- \
> + perf test -w traploop $loops > "$TMPDIR/record.txt" 2>&1
> + perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstacksym | \
> + tr ' ' '\n' > $TMPDIR/perf.script
> +
> + # BRBINF<n>.TYPE == TRAP are mapped to PERF_BR_IRQ by the BRBE driver
> + check_branches "^trap_bench\+[^ ]+/[^ ]/IRQ/"
> + check_branches "^[^ ]+/trap_bench\+[^ ]+/ERET/"
[Severity: Medium]
Will these check_branches() calls pollute the test logs with false-positive
errors during intermediate loop iterations?
The shared check_branches() helper unconditionally prints "ERROR: Branches
missing" when it fails to find samples. This might trigger automated CI log
parser failures when an initial retryable loop iteration fails, even if a
subsequent iteration succeeds. This also applies to the similar loop added
to test_syscall().
> + if [ $err -eq 0 ]; then
> + ret=0
> + break
> + fi
> + done
[ ... ]
> @@ -135,32 +144,40 @@ test_kernel_branches() {
[ ... ]
> - # Look for source addresses with top bit set
> - if ! grep -q -E -m1 "^0x[89a-f][0-9a-f]{15}" $TMPDIR/perf.script; then
> - echo "Testing kernel branch sampling [Failed kernel branches missing]"
> - err=1
> - fi
> - # Look for no target addresses without top bit set
> - if grep -q -E -m1 "^0x[0-9a-f]{0,16}/0x[0-7][0-9a-f]{1,15}/" $TMPDIR/perf.script; then
> - echo "Testing kernel branch sampling [Failed user branches found]"
> - err=1
> - fi
> - if [ $err -eq 0 ]; then
> + local ret=1
> + for loops in 1000 10000 100000; do
> + err=0
> + perf record -o $TMPDIR/perf.data --branch-filter any,k -- \
> + perf bench syscall basic --loop $loops > "$TMPDIR/record.txt" 2>&1
> + perf script -i $TMPDIR/perf.data --fields brstack | \
> + tr ' ' '\n' > $TMPDIR/perf.script
> +
> + # Example of branch entries:
> + # "0xffffffff93bda241/0xffffffff93bda20f/M/-/-/..."
> + # Source addresses come first in user or kernel code. Next is the target
> + # address that must be in the kernel.
> +
> + # Look for source addresses with top bit set
> + if ! grep -q -E -m1 "^0x[89a-f][0-9a-f]{15}" $TMPDIR/perf.script; then
> + err=1
> + fi
> + # Look for no target addresses without top bit set
> + if grep -q -E -m1 "^0x[0-9a-f]{0,16}/0x[0-7][0-9a-f]{1,15}/" \
> + $TMPDIR/perf.script; then
> + err=1
> + fi
[Severity: Medium]
Does removing these diagnostic echo statements strip necessary failure
diagnostics?
If the test definitively fails after all retry iterations are exhausted, it
appears we will no longer know whether the failure was due to missing kernel
branches or unexpected user branches since the specific echo outputs have
been removed.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260623012758.2291858-1-irogers@google.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 1:27 [PATCH v1 00/12] perf tests: Enhancements, speedups, and flakiness fixes Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] perf parse-events: Restrict core PMU bypass to --cputype option Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] perf tests workloads: Support sub-second durations in noploop and thloop Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] perf tests: Add robust record retry helper and use subsecond workloads Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] perf tests: Skip metrics validation if system-wide recording lacks permission Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] perf tests: Fix Python JIT dump profiling test failure Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in trace record and replay test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in BPF counters test on hybrid systems Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] perf tests: Speed up off-cpu profiling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] perf tests: Speed up lock contention analysis shell test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 1:27 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] perf tests: Speed up metrics checking shell tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] perf tests: Enhance robustness, speed up execution, and fix flakiness Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] perf parse-events: Restrict core PMU bypass to --cputype option Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 15:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 15:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] perf tests workloads: Support sub-second durations in noploop and thloop Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] perf tests: Add robust record retry helper and use subsecond workloads Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] perf tests: Skip metrics validation if system-wide recording lacks permission Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] perf tests: Fix Python JIT dump profiling test failure Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 6:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in trace record and replay test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in BPF counters test on hybrid systems Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] perf tests: Speed up off-cpu profiling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] perf tests: Speed up lock contention analysis shell test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 6:14 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] perf tests: Speed up metrics checking shell tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 00/13] perf tests: Robustness and performance improvements Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] perf parse-events: Restrict core PMU bypass to --cputype option Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width Ian Rogers
2026-06-17 22:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-23 0:51 ` Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] perf tests workloads: Support sub-second durations in noploop and thloop Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] perf tests: Add robust record retry helper and use subsecond workloads Ian Rogers
2026-06-17 22:37 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-18 13:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-06-22 23:59 ` Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 6:06 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] perf tests: Skip metrics validation if system-wide recording lacks permission Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] perf tests: Fix Python JIT dump profiling test failure Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in trace record and replay test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in BPF counters test on hybrid systems Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] perf tests: Speed up off-cpu profiling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] perf tests: Speed up lock contention analysis shell test Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] perf tests: Speed up metrics checking shell tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-16 16:48 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] perf tests: Include error output for skipped tests in JUnit XML Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] perf tests: Robustness and performance improvements Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] perf parse-events: Restrict core PMU bypass to --cputype option Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] perf test: Truncate test description to fit terminal width Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 21:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] perf tests workloads: Support sub-second durations in noploop and thloop Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 21:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] perf tests: Add robust record retry helper and use subsecond workloads Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 21:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] perf tests: Skip metrics validation if system-wide recording lacks permission Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] perf tests: Fix Python JIT dump profiling test failure Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in trace record and replay test Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in BPF counters test on hybrid systems Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] perf tests: Fix flakiness in branch stack sampling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] perf tests: Speed up off-cpu profiling tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] perf tests: Speed up lock contention analysis shell test Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 22:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] perf tests: Speed up metrics checking shell tests Ian Rogers
2026-06-23 1:27 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] perf tests: Include error output for skipped tests in JUnit XML Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260623220041.06D291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.