All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>
To: Wei Gao <wegao@suse.com>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2026 10:38:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260701083825.GB477554@pevik> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260616093119.8654-3-wegao@suse.com>

Hi Wei,

> Add negative cases for connect(), when errno is EPROTOTYPE or EACCES.
> These error paths were not exercised by the existing test.

...
> @@ -49,6 +62,10 @@ static struct test_case_t {
>  		"connect on a socket found no one listening on remote address"},
>  	{&fd_socket, &sock3, sizeof(sock3), EAFNOSUPPORT,
>  		"address doesn't have the correct address family in sa_family"},
> +	{&fd_unix_dgram, &sock4, sizeof(sock4), EPROTOTYPE,
> +		"socket type does not support the protocol"},
> +	{&fd_unix_stream, &sock4, sizeof(sock4), EACCES,
> +		"write permission is denied on the socket file"},
>  };

>  static int sys_connect(int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *addr,
> @@ -103,6 +120,19 @@ static void setup(void)
>  	sock3.sin_family = 47;
>  	sock3.sin_port = 0;
>  	sock3.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(0x0AFFFEFD);
> +
> +	sock4.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> +	strncpy(sock4.sun_path, SOCK_FILE, sizeof(sock4.sun_path));
> +
> +	fd_unix_server = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> +	SAFE_BIND(fd_unix_server, (struct sockaddr *)&sock4, sizeof(sock4));
> +	SAFE_CHMOD(SOCK_FILE, 0700);
> +	SAFE_LISTEN(fd_unix_server, 5);
> +
> +	fd_unix_dgram = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> +	fd_unix_stream = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> +
> +	pw = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
>  }

...

> -	TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, addr, tc->salen),
> -		     tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> +	if (tc->exp_errno == EACCES) {
> +		if (!SAFE_FORK()) {
> +			SAFE_SETUID(pw->pw_uid);
> +			TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, addr, tc->salen),
> +				     tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> +			exit(0);
> +		}
> +		tst_reap_children();
> +	} else {
> +		TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, addr, tc->salen),
> +			     tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> +	}

This looks to me way complicated when put into an existing test. Wouldn't be
better to create to add them to a new file (connect03.c)? Please use the style I
introduced in connect01.c (designated initializers, errnos in doc, void =>
struct sockaddr_in, ...).

Kind regards,
Petr

-- 
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-01  8:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-14  4:51 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] connect01: Convert to new API Yang Xu via ltp
2024-05-14  4:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Yang Xu via ltp
2024-07-17 12:30 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] connect01: Convert to new API Cyril Hrubis
2026-05-25  9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25  9:02   ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 10:12     ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-05-28  4:43       ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04  4:49     ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04  4:49       ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04  7:15         ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16  1:47         ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16  1:47           ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16  4:07             ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16  5:24             ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16  5:24               ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16  8:35                 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16  9:31                 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16  9:31                   ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 10:12                     ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-01  8:34                     ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Petr Vorel
2026-06-16  9:31                   ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-01  8:38                     ` Petr Vorel [this message]
2026-07-06  6:02                     ` [LTP] [PATCH v8] connect03: New test case for EPROTOTYPE and EACCES errors Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-06  8:22                       ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-06 23:39                       ` [LTP] [PATCH v9] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-07  3:25                         ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-09 16:43                         ` [LTP] [PATCH v9] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-07-10  5:13                         ` [LTP] [PATCH v10] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-10  8:31                           ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-13  7:52                           ` [LTP] [PATCH v10] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-06-16  5:24               ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16  1:47           ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04  4:49       ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25  9:02   ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 " Wei Gao via ltp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260701083825.GB477554@pevik \
    --to=pvorel@suse.cz \
    --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \
    --cc=wegao@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.