From: Andrea Cervesato via ltp <ltp@lists.linux.it>
To: "Wei Gao via ltp" <ltp@lists.linux.it>
Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v9] connect03: New test case for EPROTOTYPE and EACCES errors
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 16:43:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a4fcf9c.795e137c.249a98.9ebd@mx.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706234000.23719-1-wegao@suse.com>
Hi Wei,
we can remove privileged user needs for this test.
> +static int sys_connect(int sockfd, const struct sockaddr *addr,
> + socklen_t addrlen)
> +{
> + return tst_syscall(__NR_connect, sockfd, addr, addrlen);
> +}
we should probably use connect() here instead of raw syscall.
> +
> +static void setup(void)
> +{
> + sock_un.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> + strncpy(sock_un.sun_path, SOCK_FILE, sizeof(sock_un.sun_path));
> +
> + fd_unix_server = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> + SAFE_BIND(fd_unix_server, (struct sockaddr *)&sock_un, sizeof(sock_un));
> + SAFE_CHMOD(SOCK_FILE, 0700);
> + SAFE_LISTEN(fd_unix_server, 5);
> +
> + fd_unix_dgram = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);
> + fd_unix_stream = SAFE_SOCKET(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
> +
> + pw = SAFE_GETPWNAM("nobody");
we only need this to trigger EACCES, so probably chmod(0500) is enough.
Read below.
> +}
> +
> +static void cleanup(void)
> +{
> + if (fd_unix_dgram != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_unix_dgram);
> + if (fd_unix_stream != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_unix_stream);
> + if (fd_unix_server != -1)
> + SAFE_CLOSE(fd_unix_server);
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_connect(unsigned int i)
> +{
> + struct test_case_t *tc = &tcases[i];
> +
> + if (tc->exp_errno == EACCES) {
> + if (!SAFE_FORK()) {
> + SAFE_SETUID(pw->pw_uid);
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, (const struct sockaddr *)tc->addr, tc->salen),
> + tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> + exit(0);
> + }
> + tst_reap_children();
> + } else {
> + TST_EXP_FAIL(sys_connect(*tc->fd, (const struct sockaddr *)tc->addr, tc->salen),
> + tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
> + }
This can easily become:
SAFE_CHMOD(SOCK_FILE, tc->mode);
TST_EXP_FAIL(connect(*tc->fd, (struct sockaddr *)&sock_un, sizeof(sock_un)),
tc->exp_errno, "%s", tc->desc);
To make it works, we need a mode attribute in the tcase struct:
- 0700 for EPROTOTYPE
- 0500 for EACCES
> +}
> +
> +static struct tst_test test = {
> + .setup = setup,
> + .cleanup = cleanup,
> + .tcnt = ARRAY_SIZE(tcases),
> + .test = verify_connect,
> + .forks_child = 1,
this is not needed anymore.
> + .needs_root = 1,
And root can go away.
> + .needs_tmpdir = 1,
> +};
> --
> 2.54.0
>
>
> --
> Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
Regards,
--
Andrea Cervesato
SUSE QE Automation Engineer Linux
andrea.cervesato@suse.com
--
Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-14 4:51 [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] connect01: Convert to new API Yang Xu via ltp
2024-05-14 4:51 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Yang Xu via ltp
2024-07-17 12:30 ` [LTP] [PATCH v2 1/2] connect01: Convert to new API Cyril Hrubis
2026-05-25 9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 10:12 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-05-28 4:43 ` Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 4:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 4:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 7:15 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16 1:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 1:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 4:07 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16 5:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 5:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 8:35 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 0/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 10:12 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-01 8:34 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 1/2] " Petr Vorel
2026-06-16 9:31 ` [LTP] [PATCH v7 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-01 8:38 ` Petr Vorel
2026-07-06 6:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v8] connect03: New test case for EPROTOTYPE and EACCES errors Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-06 8:22 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-06 23:39 ` [LTP] [PATCH v9] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-07 3:25 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-09 16:43 ` Andrea Cervesato via ltp [this message]
2026-07-10 5:13 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10] " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-07-10 8:31 ` [LTP] " linuxtestproject.agent
2026-07-13 7:52 ` [LTP] [PATCH v10] " Andrea Cervesato via ltp
2026-06-16 5:24 ` [LTP] [PATCH v6 2/2] connect01: Add negative tests Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-16 1:47 ` [LTP] [PATCH v5 " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-06-04 4:49 ` [LTP] [PATCH v4 " Wei Gao via ltp
2026-05-25 9:02 ` [LTP] [PATCH v3 " Wei Gao via ltp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a4fcf9c.795e137c.249a98.9ebd@mx.google.com \
--to=ltp@lists.linux.it \
--cc=andrea.cervesato@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.