Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce Shikra SoC base dtsi

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@quicinc.com>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulfh@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, monish.chunara@oss.qualcomm.com,
	Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Monish Chunara <quic_mchunara@quicinc.com>,
	Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Xueyao An <xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/5] arm64: dts: qcom: Introduce Shikra SoC base dtsi
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 16:58:46 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260714215846.GA2932445-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-shikra-dt-v7-2-977b65a300c1@oss.qualcomm.com>

On Wed, Jul 08, 2026 at 05:47:31PM +0530, Komal Bajaj wrote:
> Add initial device tree support for the Qualcomm Shikra SoC,
> an IoT-focused platform built around a heterogeneous CPU cluster
> (Cortex-A55 + Cortex-A78C) with RPM-based power and clock management.
> 
> Enable support for the following peripherals:
>   - CPU nodes
>   - Global Clock Controller (GCC)
>   - RPM-based clock controller (RPMCC) and power domains (RPMPD)
>   - Interrupt controller
>   - Top Level Mode Multiplexer (TLMM)
>   - Debug UART
>   - eMMC host controller
>   - System timer and watchdog
> 
> Co-developed-by: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imran Shaik <imran.shaik@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Monish Chunara <quic_mchunara@quicinc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Monish Chunara <quic_mchunara@quicinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Kota <rakesh.kota@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <raviteja.laggyshetty@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Santhosh <vishnu.santhosh@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Co-developed-by: Xueyao An <xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xueyao An <xueyao.an@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Komal Bajaj <komal.bajaj@oss.qualcomm.com>

So none of these people nor the maintainers managed to run dtbs_check on 
this?

All of these show up as undocumented in linux-next now:

     'qcom,scm-shikra', 'qcom,scm'
     'qcom,shikra-imem', 'mmio-sram'
     'qcom,shikra-tcsr', 'syscon'

Please fix or drop this series.

I'm tired of chasing down new QCom DT warnings.

Rob

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy