From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Manivannan Sadhasivam" <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 12:11:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730121121.6EA651F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-iommu-map-fix-v1-4-83405d37ba41@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Fixing `iommu-map` to use 5 cells breaks rigid 4-cell parsing in the `pcie-qcom.c` driver, corrupting PCIe SID translation.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 04/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries ---
commit 2707161425e0efca5af00d7a068414771d8112e9
Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries
This commit fixes the PCIe iommu-map entries to match the apps_smmu
provider's #iommu-cells = <2> property. It adds the missing SID mask cell to
prevent warnings from the OF core about 1-cell entries targeting 2-cell
outputs.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc8180x.dtsi
> @@ -1767,8 +1767,8 @@ pcie0: pcie@1c00000 {
> assigned-clocks = <&gcc GCC_PCIE_0_AUX_CLK>;
> assigned-clock-rates = <19200000>;
>
> - iommu-map = <0x0 &apps_smmu 0x1d80 0x1>,
> - <0x100 &apps_smmu 0x1d81 0x1>;
> + iommu-map = <0x0 &apps_smmu 0x1d80 0x0 0x1>,
> + <0x100 &apps_smmu 0x1d81 0x0 0x1>;
[Severity: High]
Does this change break the manual iommu-map parsing in the PCIe driver?
Looking at qcom_pcie_config_sid_1_9_0() in
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c, the driver assumes a rigid 4-cell
length for iommu-map entries:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c:qcom_pcie_config_sid_1_9_0() {
...
struct {
u32 bdf;
u32 phandle;
u32 smmu_sid;
u32 smmu_sid_len;
} *map;
...
of_property_read_u32_array(dev->of_node, "iommu-map", (u32 *)map,
size / sizeof(u32));
...
}
By increasing the iommu-map property to 5 cells per entry, will this misalign
the array when the driver parses multiple entries?
For the second entry here, map[1].bdf would read the 5th cell of the first
entry (length), map[1].phandle would read the BDF of the second entry, and
map[1].smmu_sid would read the phandle pointer.
Does this corrupt the SID translation and lead to IOMMU faults for downstream
PCIe endpoints?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-iommu-map-fix-v1-0-83405d37ba41@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 11:55 [PATCH 00/22] arm64: dts: qcom: Fix the PCIe iommu-map entries Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 01/22] arm64: dts: qcom: kaanapali: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 02/22] arm64: dts: qcom: kodiak: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 03/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sar2130p: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 04/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc8180x: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 05/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 06/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 07/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 08/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8350: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 09/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 10/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 13:39 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 11/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8650: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 13:39 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 12/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8750: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 13/22] arm64: dts: qcom: talos: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 14/22] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 15/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 16/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-monza-som: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 17/22] arm64: dts: qcom: monaco-evk-ifp-mezzanine: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:55 ` [PATCH 18/22] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans-evk-ifp-mezzanine: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:55 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 19/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-radxa-dragon-q6a: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 20/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-thundercomm-minipc-g1iot: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 21/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-30 11:56 ` [PATCH 22/22] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs6490-rb3gen2-industrial-mezzanine: " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2026-07-30 11:56 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 12:23 ` [PATCH 00/22] arm64: dts: qcom: " Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-07-30 16:14 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-07-30 16:25 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2026-07-30 12:46 ` Konrad Dybcio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730121121.6EA651F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.