All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@kernel.org>
Cc: yukuai@fygo.io, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 17/29] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 20:39:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802203909.411B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802195038.164272-18-yukuai@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The `reshape_finish` callback is never invoked by the md core, rendering the new geometry commit logic dead code.
- [High] In-flight I/O during an array reshape triggers an out-of-bounds array access in `llbitmap_raise_barrier` due to stale chunkshift values.
--

--- Patch [17]: [PATCH v5 17/29] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry ---
commit f7a8f4b26cc5a0c01433cbcd7568266fb367e5e1
Author: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>

md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry

This commit updates the llbitmap reshape geometry when the reshape finishes.
It refreshes the staged reshape geometry in llbitmap_load() after mddev->pers
is available, and expands the in-memory page controls before replaying the
bitmap state.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260726185916.2223460-1-mykola@meshstor.io/

> diff --git a/drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c b/drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c
> index 71a4903901425..a7c229db3058d 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1709,6 +1718,30 @@ static void llbitmap_dirty_bits(struct mddev *mddev, unsigned long s,
>  	llbitmap_state_machine(mddev->bitmap, s, e, BitmapActionStartwrite);
>  }
>  
> +static void llbitmap_reshape_finish(struct mddev *mddev)
> +{
> +	struct llbitmap *llbitmap = mddev->bitmap;
> +
> +	if (mddev->pers->quiesce)
> +		mddev->pers->quiesce(mddev, 1);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mddev->bitmap_info.mutex);
> +	llbitmap_flush(mddev);
> +
> +	llbitmap->chunksize = llbitmap->reshape_chunksize;
> +	llbitmap->chunkshift = ffz(~llbitmap->chunksize);

[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a regression where in-flight I/O during an array
reshape triggers an out-of-bounds array access due to stale chunkshift
values before they are updated here?

When an array grows, the active chunkshift remains unchanged while the page
controls are allocated for the old chunk limit. If the new chunksize is
forced to double, the new I/O offsets mapping to the expanded capacity
could be processed by llbitmap_start_write():

drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c:llbitmap_start_write() {
    unsigned long start = offset >> llbitmap->chunkshift;
    unsigned long end = (offset + sectors - 1) >> llbitmap->chunkshift;
    int page_start = (start + BITMAP_DATA_OFFSET) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
    ...
    llbitmap_raise_barrier(llbitmap, page_start);
}

Dividing the larger offset by the old, smaller chunkshift would generate a
bit index that exceeds the old chunks.

Would this result in an out-of-bounds read/write without bounds checking
when llbitmap_raise_barrier() is called?

drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c:llbitmap_raise_barrier() {
    ...
    struct llbitmap_page_ctl *pctl = llbitmap->pctl[page_idx];
    ...
}

> +	llbitmap->chunks = llbitmap->reshape_chunks;
> +	llbitmap->sync_size = llbitmap->reshape_sync_size;
> +	llbitmap_refresh_reshape(llbitmap);
> +	mddev->bitmap_info.chunksize = llbitmap->chunksize;
> +	llbitmap_update_sb(llbitmap);
> +	__llbitmap_flush(mddev);
> +	mutex_unlock(&mddev->bitmap_info.mutex);
> +
> +	if (mddev->pers->quiesce)
> +		mddev->pers->quiesce(mddev, 0);
> +}
> +
[ ... ]
> @@ -2000,6 +2033,7 @@ static struct bitmap_operations llbitmap_ops = {
>  	.get_stats		= llbitmap_get_stats,
>  	.dirty_bits		= llbitmap_dirty_bits,
>  	.prepare_range		= llbitmap_prepare_range,
> +	.reshape_finish		= llbitmap_reshape_finish,

[Severity: High]
Is there a regression where the md core never calls this reshape_finish
callback?

Looking at the md core code, it does not appear to invoke
mddev->bitmap_ops->reshape_finish anywhere. If this is never called, would
the staged reshape geometry be silently dropped, leaving the bitmap
permanently out of sync with the expanded array capacity after a reshape
completes?

>  	.write_all		= llbitmap_write_all,
>  
>  	.groups			= md_llbitmap_groups,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802195038.164272-1-yukuai@kernel.org?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-02 20:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-02 19:50 [PATCH v5 00/29] md: improve lockless bitmap reshape support Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] md/md-llbitmap: clear flush state after daemon flush Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:28   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] md/md-llbitmap: use GFP_NOIO for cache allocations Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] md/md-llbitmap: only end fully synced chunks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] md/raid5: reject zero-sector reshape chunks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] md/raid5: round bitmap stripes with sector division Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] md: wait for behind writes before destroying bitmap Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] md: avoid stale clone I/O accounting timestamps Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] md/md-llbitmap: prevent create failure bitmap UAF Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] md/md-llbitmap: stop daemon timer rearm on destroy Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] md: skip bitmap accounting for empty write ranges Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] md: add helper to split bios at reshape offset Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] md: add exact bitmap mapping and reshape hooks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] md/md-llbitmap: track bitmap sync_size explicitly Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] md/md-llbitmap: allocate page controls independently Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] md/md-llbitmap: grow the page cache in place for reshape Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] md/md-llbitmap: track target reshape geometry fields Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:39   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] md/md-llbitmap: refuse reshape while llbitmap still needs sync Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] md/md-llbitmap: add reshape range mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] md/md-llbitmap: don't skip reshape ranges from bitmap state Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] md/md-llbitmap: remap checkpointed bits as reshape progresses Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] md/md-llbitmap: clamp state-machine walks to tracked bits Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] md/raid10: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:40   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] md/raid10: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] md/raid5: add exact old and new llbitmap mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] md/raid5: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] md/raid5: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-08-03 12:11 ` [PATCH v5 00/29] md: improve lockless bitmap reshape support Mykola Marzhan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260802203909.411B31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
    --cc=yukuai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.