From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, yukuai@fygo.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/29] md: wait for behind writes before destroying bitmap
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2026 20:40:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260802204002.69D191F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260802195038.164272-7-yukuai@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Dynamic removal of llbitmap via sysfs or ioctl does not wait for behind writes, leading to a NULL pointer dereference.
- [High] Teardown asymmetry in llbitmap_destroy allows the pending_timer to be re-armed after deletion, leading to a Use-After-Free of llbitmap.
- [High] Lockless TOCTOU race on `mddev->bitmap_ops` leading to NULL pointer dereference.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v5 06/29] md: wait for behind writes before destroying bitmap ---
commit 908390619225b153696b5648f3002688751593a6
Author: Yu Kuai <yukuai@fygo.io>
md: wait for behind writes before destroying bitmap
__md_stop() previously destroyed the bitmap before calling mddev_detach(),
skipping the wait for behind writes. This commit reorders them to call
mddev_detach() first, ensuring behind writes are waited on while the
bitmap is still alive.
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index 51b620edbef75..b61040315aef6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -7085,8 +7085,8 @@ static void __md_stop(struct mddev *mddev)
> {
> struct md_personality *pers = mddev->pers;
>
> - md_bitmap_destroy(mddev);
> mddev_detach(mddev);
> + md_bitmap_destroy(mddev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does dynamic removal of the bitmap via
sysfs fail to wait for behind writes?
When a user writes to bitmap/location to clear the bitmap dynamically,
location_store() calls mddev_suspend_and_lock() to suspend the array.
mddev_suspend() waits for active_io to drop to 0. For RAID1 behind writes,
active_io is dropped by md_end_clone_io() when non-writemostly devices
complete their writes:
drivers/md/md.c:md_handle_request() {
...
percpu_ref_put(&mddev->active_io);
...
}
This means behind writes to writemostly devices can still be in flight.
location_store() then proceeds to free the bitmap:
drivers/md/md-bitmap.c:location_store() {
...
md_bitmap_destroy_nosysfs(mddev);
...
}
When behind writes finally complete, could close_write() dereference the
now NULL bitmap_ops pointer?
drivers/md/raid1.c:close_write() {
...
mddev->bitmap_ops->end_behind_write(mddev);
...
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can the llbitmap pending_timer be re-armed
after it is deleted during destruction?
llbitmap_destroy() deletes the timer and flushes the workqueue:
drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c:llbitmap_destroy() {
...
timer_delete_sync(&llbitmap->pending_timer);
flush_workqueue(md_llbitmap_io_wq);
...
}
If the timer expires right before deletion, the handler queues
md_llbitmap_daemon_fn() to the workqueue. If unexpired dirty pages exist,
the daemon function evaluates time_before(jiffies, pctl->expire). Since
llbitmap_resume() sets pctl->expire to LONG_MAX, this evaluates to true,
setting restart to true. The timer is then unconditionally re-armed:
drivers/md/md-llbitmap.c:md_llbitmap_daemon_fn() {
...
if (restart)
mod_timer(&llbitmap->pending_timer, ...);
...
}
The flush_workqueue() call in llbitmap_destroy() will wait for this work
to finish, but it does not prevent the timer from being re-armed. Could
this leave the timer armed with a freed llbitmap pointer, causing a
use-after-free when it fires?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but is there a TOCTOU race on
mddev->bitmap_ops between the teardown path and concurrent readers?
In the background thread, md_check_recovery() checks md_bitmap_enabled(),
which locklessly verifies mddev->bitmap_ops is not NULL:
drivers/md/md.c:md_check_recovery() {
...
if (md_bitmap_enabled(mddev, false) && mddev->bitmap_ops->daemon_work)
mddev->bitmap_ops->daemon_work(mddev);
...
}
Concurrently, a write to bitmap/location via sysfs triggers location_store(),
which acquires reconfig_mutex (but not mddev->lock or bitmap_info.mutex)
and calls md_bitmap_destroy_nosysfs(), unconditionally setting the ops
pointer to NULL:
drivers/md/md.c:md_bitmap_destroy_nosysfs() {
...
mddev->bitmap_ops = NULL;
...
}
Could md_check_recovery() proceed to dereference the now NULL pointer? A
similar race appears to exist with md_seq_show() reading /proc/mdstat,
which holds locks not respected by the sysfs teardown path:
drivers/md/md.c:md_seq_show() {
...
md_bitmap_status(seq, mddev);
...
}
> spin_lock(&mddev->lock);
> mddev->pers = NULL;
> spin_unlock(&mddev->lock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260802195038.164272-1-yukuai@kernel.org?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-02 20:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 19:50 [PATCH v5 00/29] md: improve lockless bitmap reshape support Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] md/md-llbitmap: clear flush state after daemon flush Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] md/md-llbitmap: use GFP_NOIO for cache allocations Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] md/md-llbitmap: only end fully synced chunks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] md/raid5: reject zero-sector reshape chunks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] md/raid5: round bitmap stripes with sector division Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] md: wait for behind writes before destroying bitmap Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] md: avoid stale clone I/O accounting timestamps Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] md/md-llbitmap: prevent create failure bitmap UAF Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] md/md-llbitmap: stop daemon timer rearm on destroy Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] md: skip bitmap accounting for empty write ranges Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] md: add helper to split bios at reshape offset Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] md: add exact bitmap mapping and reshape hooks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] md/md-llbitmap: track bitmap sync_size explicitly Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] md/md-llbitmap: allocate page controls independently Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] md/md-llbitmap: grow the page cache in place for reshape Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] md/md-llbitmap: track target reshape geometry fields Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] md/md-llbitmap: finish reshape geometry Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] md/md-llbitmap: refuse reshape while llbitmap still needs sync Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] md/md-llbitmap: add reshape range mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] md/md-llbitmap: don't skip reshape ranges from bitmap state Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] md/md-llbitmap: remap checkpointed bits as reshape progresses Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] md/md-llbitmap: clamp state-machine walks to tracked bits Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] md/raid10: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] md/raid10: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] md/raid10: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] md/raid5: add exact old and new llbitmap mapping helpers Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] md/raid5: reject llbitmap reshape when md chunk shrinks Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] md/raid5: wire llbitmap reshape lifecycle Yu Kuai
2026-08-02 20:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 19:50 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] md/raid5: split reshape bios before bitmap accounting Yu Kuai
2026-08-03 12:11 ` [PATCH v5 00/29] md: improve lockless bitmap reshape support Mykola Marzhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260802204002.69D191F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yukuai@fygo.io \
--cc=yukuai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.