Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: mfd: Use generic power-controller schema

From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: "Lee Jones" <lee@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Lubomir Rintel" <lkundrak@v3.sk>,
	"Dmitry Osipenko" <digetx@gmail.com>,
	"Shree Ramamoorthy" <s-ramamoorthy@ti.com>,
	"Heiko Stuebner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"Joseph Chen" <chenjh@rock-chips.com>,
	"Chris Zhong" <zyw@rock-chips.com>,
	"Zhang Qing" <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
	"Sebastian Reichel" <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
	"Andreas Kemnade" <andreas@kemnade.info>,
	"Jonathan Neuschäfer" <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>,
	"Julien Panis" <jpanis@baylibre.com>,
	"Matti Vaittinen" <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>,
	"Alexander Kurz" <akurz@blala.de>,
	"André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>,
	mfd@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, "Peng Fan" <peng.fan@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] dt-bindings: mfd: Use generic power-controller schema
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 16:10:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805211054.GA1783131-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804-mfd-syspower-v1-0-a440783c2e78@nxp.com>

On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 10:16:35PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> The generic power-controller.yaml schema has been added to dt-schema[1],
> providing a common definition for the `system-power-controller` boolean
> property. Convert MFD bindings that locally define this property to
> instead reference the shared schema.
> 
> The common change across all patches is:
>  - Add a $ref to /schemas/power/power-controller.yaml#
>  - Remove the local `system-power-controller` property definition
>  - Switch from additionalProperties to unevaluatedProperties
> 
> This is a pick of patches 2-11 from [2], rebased to linux-next/master,
> no changes. Patch 1 (the generic power-controller.yaml schema itself)
> is dropped since it has already been picked up by dt-schema.
> 
> [1] https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/pull/187
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/177523251875.1559844.9690289848283345069.b4-ty@b4/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
> ---
> Peng Fan (10):
>       dt-bindings: mfd: ene-kb[3]930: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps65910: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: rockchip,rk8x: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: ricoh,rn5t618: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: netronix,ntxec: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: ti,twl: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: ti,tps6594: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: rohm,bd71828-pmic: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: fsl,mc13xxx: Use generic power-controller schema
>       dt-bindings: mfd: samsung,s2mpg10-pmic: Use generic power-controller schema

Can we hold off on this until at least the next cycle. This change 
effectively bumps the minimum version of dtschema. While 
power-controller.yaml is added to dtschema, it is not yet in a released 
version. I'm not all that sure these changes are much improvement given 
it is a single boolean.

Rob

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip