From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Kendall Willis" <k-willis@ti.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2026 22:16:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260820221647.2A5861F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260820-smth-v1-4-e1738a38d58e@ti.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The `out-band-wakeup` device tree property is added to `m_can` devices, but no C code in the kernel parses this property, making it completely inert. The commit message states this property is intended to allow the `out_band_wakeup` flag to be enabled during suspend. However, an exhaustive search of the kernel source confirms the string `"out-band-wakeup"` is not present in any C code, nor is it documented in the DT bindings. Neither the generic driver core nor the `m_can` driver reads this property or calls `device_set_out_band_wakeup()`. As a result, `dev->power.out_band_wakeup` will remain false, and the intended out-of-band wakeup functionality will not operate.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices ---
commit 7f02e9c8c4b2476d4793985a8f2b56891c451cf2
Author: Kendall Willis <k-willis@ti.com>
arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices
This commit adds the out-band-wakeup property to the mcu_mcan0 and mcu_mcan1
nodes in the k3-am62d2-evm device tree. It intends to enable the
out_band_wakeup flag during suspend for these devices.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts
> index f5ceb6a1b5deb..7f3c50a56ea87 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am62d2-evm.dts
> @@ -789,6 +789,7 @@ &c7x_0 {
> };
>
> &mcu_mcan0 {
> + out-band-wakeup;
[Severity: Medium]
Is the "out-band-wakeup" property actually parsed by the kernel?
Looking through the kernel source, there doesn't appear to be any C code
that parses the "out-band-wakeup" string, nor does it seem to be documented
in the DT bindings.
Neither the generic driver core nor the m_can driver appears to read this
property or call device_set_out_band_wakeup(), which would leave
dev->power.out_band_wakeup as false and prevent the intended out-of-band
wakeup functionality from operating.
Does this patch rely on another driver change that hasn't been merged yet?
> pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
> pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_default>;
> pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan0_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan0_rx_pins_wakeup>;
[ ... ]
> @@ -800,6 +801,7 @@ &mcu_mcan0 {
> };
>
> &mcu_mcan1 {
> + out-band-wakeup;
[Severity: Medium]
Will this face the same issue where the property is ignored by the kernel?
> pinctrl-names = "default", "wakeup";
> pinctrl-0 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_default>;
> pinctrl-1 = <&mcu_mcan1_tx_pins_default>, <&mcu_mcan1_rx_pins_wakeup>;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260820-smth-v1-0-e1738a38d58e@ti.com?part=4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-20 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-20 22:08 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: dts: ti: add out-band-wakeup property to m_can devices Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62-lp-sk: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62a7-sk: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62p5-sk: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-20 22:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am62d2-evm: " Kendall Willis
2026-08-20 22:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260820221647.2A5861F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=k-willis@ti.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.