All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2026 03:07:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902030708.8AA051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902021804.718676-17-chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Adding APX host support inflates KVM's FPU uabi_size beyond 4096 bytes for all VMs, completely breaking the KVM_GET_XSAVE and KVM_SET_XSAVE UAPIs for legacy VMMs on APX-capable hosts.
--

commit f809671f7be8f3b21dbbd90937f8c5a3e917c643
Author: Chang S. Bae <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>

KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0

This commit sets kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 for APX when the host has enabled
the APX state and CONFIG_KVM_APX is configured. This allows KVM to expose
APX features to guests.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 76f70d2631f67..8c6365122efb8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -7132,6 +7132,8 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
>  	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVE)) {
>  		kvm_host.xcr0 = xgetbv(XCR_XFEATURE_ENABLED_MASK);
>  		kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 = kvm_host.xcr0 & KVM_SUPPORTED_XCR0;
> +		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_APX))
> +			kvm_caps.supported_xcr0 |= kvm_host.xcr0 & XFEATURE_MASK_APX;

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does enabling APX host support here
inadvertently break the KVM_GET_XSAVE and KVM_SET_XSAVE UAPIs for legacy
VMMs?

Because APX (component 19) is a static user feature, its inclusion in
fpu_user_cfg.default_features requires an uncompacted offset that
accommodates the 8KB AMX (component 18) hole. This results in an uncompacted
offset greater than 10KB, which inflates fpu_user_cfg.default_size.

When KVM initializes a vCPU, it sets the baseline uabi_size to this
inflated value:

arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:fpu_alloc_guest_fpstate() {
    ...
    if (WARN_ON_ONCE(fpu_user_cfg.default_size > gfpu->uabi_size))
        gfpu->uabi_size = fpu_user_cfg.default_size;
    ...
}

Consequently, uabi_size grows beyond the standard 4096 bytes for all VMs.

For older VMMs attempting to use the standard 4096-byte buffers,
kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() handles the UAPI boundary by unconditionally failing
KVM_GET_XSAVE with -EINVAL:

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() {
    ...
    case KVM_GET_XSAVE: {
        r = -EINVAL;
        if (vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size > sizeof(struct kvm_xsave))
            break;
    ...
}

Similarly, for KVM_SET_XSAVE, it reads out of bounds from the 4096-byte user
buffer, returning -EFAULT:

arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl() {
    ...
    case KVM_SET_XSAVE: {
        int size = vcpu->arch.guest_fpu.uabi_size;

        u.xsave = memdup_user(argp, size);
    ...
}

Could this deterministically break VM creation and live migration on
APX-capable hosts for legacy VMMs?

>  	}
>  
>  	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES)) {

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260902021804.718676-1-chang.seok.bae@intel.com?part=16

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02  2:17 [PATCH v7 00/20] KVM: x86: Enable APX for guests Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 01/20] KVM: x86: Extend VCPU registers for EGPRs Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/20] KVM: VMX: Save guest EGPRs in VCPU cache Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/20] KVM: x86: Support APX state for XSAVE ABI Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 04/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor VMX instruction information access Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information decoding Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 06/20] KVM: VMX: Remove unused control-register access defines Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 07/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor register index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support instruction information extension Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 09/20] KVM: nVMX: Propagate extended instruction information Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 10/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for emulator Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 11/20] KVM: x86: Handle EGPR index and REX2-incompatible opcodes Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-prefixed opcode decode Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 13/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefixed instructions Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 14/20] KVM: x86: Move KVM_SUPPORTED_{XCR0,XSS} into kvm_x86_vendor_init() Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:17 ` [PATCH v7 15/20] KVM: x86: Guard valid XCR0.APX settings Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:18 ` [PATCH v7 16/20] KVM: x86: Add APX to supported XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:07   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-02  2:18 ` [PATCH v7 17/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundation feature to userspace Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  2:18 ` [PATCH v7 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:18 ` [PATCH v7 19/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state and ABI test Chang S. Bae
2026-09-02  3:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02  2:18 ` [PATCH v7 20/20] KVM: x86: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902030708.8AA051F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.