From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
To: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>
Cc: "Ye Liu" <liuye@kylinos.cn>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@kernel.org>,
"Miaohe Lin" <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
"Naoya Horiguchi" <nao.horiguchi@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack3000@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Stoakes" <ljs@kernel.org>, "SJ Park" <sj@kernel.org>,
"Gregory Price" <gourry@gourry.net>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
pavel@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org,
pmladek@suse.com, longman@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang@linux.dev, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 00/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:20:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev> (raw)
From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Introduce for_each_process_rculock(), for_each_thread_rculock() and
for_each_process_thread_rculock() macros that combine the existing
iteration macros with scoped_guard(rcu), so that the RCU read lock
is automatically acquired before iteration and released when the
loop exits — including via break, goto, or return.
The rest of the series converts manual rcu_read_lock()/
rcu_read_unlock() and guard(rcu)() pairs across mm/, kernel/, fs/,
lib/ and security/ to use the new macros.
Suggested by Michal Hocko for the oom_kill path [2].
Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
---
Changes since v3 [4]:
- Fix patch 5 (cpu/hotplug): title and commit message incorrectly
said "thread iterator" and "for_each_thread_rculock" while the
code converts for_each_process() to for_each_process_rculock().
Note: Patches 4, 11, and 13 received automated reviews from sashiko-bot
in the v3 thread [4] that were verified as false positives:
- Patch 4: claimed the folio lock is dropped before collect_procs(),
leading to a NULL deref on folio->mapping; the lock is held in all
call paths.
- Patch 11: claimed mixing goto/scope-based cleanup in
alloc_retstack_tasklist(); the goto free label handles memory
cleanup, not lock management.
- Patch 13: claimed mixing goto/scope-based cleanup in
__set_oom_adj(); goto err_unlock manages oom_adj_mutex while
scoped_guard(rcu) manages the RCU read lock — different resources.
Changes since v2 [3]:
- Split the kernel/ patch into per-subsystem patches, as the
combined patch could not be applied (Peter Zijlstra, Steven
Rostedt).
- Move changelog below the --- separator so it is excluded from
the commit message (Lorenzo Stoakes).
- Indent loop body in macro definitions to show scoped_guard
scope (Lorenzo Stoakes).
Changes since v1 [1]:
- Rename macros from *_rcu to *_rculock, as suggested by Steven
Rostedt and acked by Thomas Gleixner, to avoid confusion with
existing *_rcu() list iterators that expect the caller to hold
the RCU read lock.
- Improve the comment on for_each_process_thread_rculock() to
document that 'break' only exits the inner loop and 'goto' is
needed to exit both loops (Thomas Gleixner).
- Rename the stale 'unlock:' label to 'out:' in hung_task.c, as
noted by Günther Noack.
- Clarify in patch 4 that page_pgoff() is safe outside the RCU
read-side critical section (SJ Park).
- CC all relevant maintainers on every patch (Lorenzo Stoakes).
- Drop the mm: prefix from patch 1, as the macros are in
include/linux/sched/signal.h (Michal Hocko).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260904083001.553587-1-ye.liu@linux.dev/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260813092933.562028-1-ye.liu@linux.dev/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260907081334.1152889-1-ye.liu@linux.dev/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260911075800.491472-1-ye.liu@linux.dev/
Ye Liu (15):
sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock
mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock
mm/ksm: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock
mm/memory-failure: convert process iterator to
for_each_process_rculock
cpu/hotplug: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock
freezer: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock
hung_task: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock
locking/lockdep: convert process/thread iterators to
for_each_*_rculock
rcu: convert process/thread iterator to
for_each_process_thread_rculock
sched: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock
tracing/fgraph: convert process/thread iterator to
for_each_process_thread_rculock
unwind: convert process/thread iterator to
for_each_process_thread_rculock
fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock
lib: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock
security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock
fs/proc/base.c | 4 +---
fs/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 8 ++------
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/cpu.c | 4 +---
kernel/freezer.c | 4 +---
kernel/hung_task.c | 11 ++++-------
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 4 +---
kernel/rcu/update.c | 4 +---
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +--
kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 +---
kernel/trace/fgraph.c | 8 ++------
kernel/unwind/deferred.c | 3 +--
lib/is_single_threaded.c | 5 +----
mm/ksm.c | 4 +---
mm/memory-failure.c | 16 ++++------------
mm/oom_kill.c | 20 +++++---------------
security/landlock/tsync.c | 8 ++------
17 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 9:20 Ye Liu [this message]
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm/ksm: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm/memory-failure: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] cpu/hotplug: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] freezer: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] hung_task: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] locking/lockdep: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] rcu: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] sched: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] tracing/fgraph: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] unwind: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] lib: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 20:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 9:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 8:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev \
--to=ye.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.