From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>, SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net,
oleg@redhat.com, tglx@kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
linmiaohe@huawei.com, nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org,
gnoack3000@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
shakeel.butt@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
chengming.zhou@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org,
frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com,
juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
pavel@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org,
pmladek@suse.com, longman@redhat.com,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
qiang.zhang@linux.dev, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
kprateek.nayak@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 02/15] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:20:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921092101.89285-3-ye.liu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev>
From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs wrapping
for_each_process()/for_each_thread() loops with for_each_process_rculock()
and for_each_thread_rculock(), which scope the RCU read lock to the
loop body via scoped_guard(rcu).
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@gourry.net>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 20 +++++---------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 5f372f6e26fa..ef2e1c423c1d 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -94,8 +94,7 @@ static bool oom_cpuset_eligible(struct task_struct *start,
bool ret = false;
const nodemask_t *mask = oc->nodemask;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_thread(start, tsk) {
+ for_each_thread_rculock(start, tsk) {
if (mask) {
/*
* If this is a mempolicy constrained oom, tsk's
@@ -114,7 +113,6 @@ static bool oom_cpuset_eligible(struct task_struct *start,
if (ret)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -368,11 +366,9 @@ static void select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc)
else {
struct task_struct *p;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p)
+ for_each_process_rculock(p)
if (oom_evaluate_task(p, oc))
break;
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -430,14 +426,12 @@ static void dump_tasks(struct oom_control *oc)
struct task_struct *p;
int i = 0;
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p) {
+ for_each_process_rculock(p) {
/* Avoid potential softlockup warning */
if ((++i & 1023) == 0)
touch_softlockup_watchdog();
dump_task(p, oc);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -894,8 +888,7 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
* are dying as well to make sure that a) nobody pins its mm and
* b) the task is also reapable by the oom reaper.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p) {
+ for_each_process_rculock(p) {
if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
continue;
if (same_thread_group(task, p))
@@ -904,7 +897,6 @@ static bool task_will_free_mem(struct task_struct *task)
if (!ret)
break;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return ret;
}
@@ -960,8 +952,7 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim, const char *message)
* That thread will now get access to memory reserves since it has a
* pending fatal signal.
*/
- rcu_read_lock();
- for_each_process(p) {
+ for_each_process_rculock(p) {
if (!process_shares_mm(p, mm))
continue;
if (same_thread_group(p, victim))
@@ -982,7 +973,6 @@ static void __oom_kill_process(struct task_struct *victim, const char *message)
continue;
do_send_sig_info(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_PRIV, p, PIDTYPE_TGID);
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
if (can_oom_reap)
queue_oom_reaper(victim);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-21 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 9:20 [PATCH v4 00/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` Ye Liu [this message]
2026-09-21 9:46 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 19:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm/ksm: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 19:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm/memory-failure: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 9:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] cpu/hotplug: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] freezer: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] hung_task: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] locking/lockdep: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] rcu: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 16:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] sched: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] tracing/fgraph: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] unwind: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 9:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] lib: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 20:12 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21 9:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 8:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260921092101.89285-3-ye.liu@linux.dev \
--to=ye.liu@linux.dev \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
--cc=gourry@gourry.net \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.