All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Liu <ye.liu@linux.dev>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>, SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>,
	Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>,
	peterz@infradead.org, paulmck@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, mic@digikod.net,
	oleg@redhat.com, tglx@kernel.org, david@kernel.org,
	nao.horiguchi@gmail.com, rafael@kernel.org, gnoack3000@gmail.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
	shakeel.butt@linux.dev, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn,
	chengming.zhou@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, boqun@kernel.org,
	frederic@kernel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org,
	joelagnelf@nvidia.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, urezki@gmail.com,
	juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
	tony.luck@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com, x86@kernel.org,
	paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	pavel@kernel.org, lance.yang@linux.dev, mhiramat@kernel.org,
	pmladek@suse.com, longman@redhat.com,
	mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	qiang.zhang@linux.dev, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	Dave.Martin@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com, babu.moger@amd.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 04/15] mm/memory-failure: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2026 17:20:50 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260921092101.89285-5-ye.liu@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921092101.89285-1-ye.liu@linux.dev>

From: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>

Replace the manual rcu_read_lock()/rcu_read_unlock() pairs combined
with for_each_process() loop in mm/memory-failure.c with
for_each_process_rculock(), which scopes the RCU read lock to the
loop body via scoped_guard(rcu).

In collect_procs_file(), the page_pgoff() call now falls outside the
RCU read-side critical section.  This is safe because page_pgoff()
only reads folio->index and does not traverse any RCU-protected
structures.

Signed-off-by: Ye Liu <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes (ARM) <ljs@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: SJ Park <sj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Price (Meta) <gourry@gourry.net>
---
 mm/memory-failure.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index a8b03e2920ba..7d93deb1f7b3 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -555,8 +555,7 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(const struct folio *folio,
 		return;
 
 	pgoff = page_pgoff(folio, page);
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_process(tsk) {
+	for_each_process_rculock(tsk) {
 		struct vm_area_struct *vma;
 		struct anon_vma_chain *vmac;
 		struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
@@ -572,7 +571,6 @@ static void collect_procs_anon(const struct folio *folio,
 			add_to_kill_anon_file(t, page, vma, to_kill, addr);
 		}
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	anon_vma_unlock_read(av);
 }
 
@@ -589,9 +587,8 @@ static void collect_procs_file(const struct folio *folio,
 	pgoff_t pgoff;
 
 	i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
-	rcu_read_lock();
 	pgoff = page_pgoff(folio, page);
-	for_each_process(tsk) {
+	for_each_process_rculock(tsk) {
 		struct task_struct *t = task_early_kill(tsk, force_early);
 		unsigned long addr;
 
@@ -611,7 +608,6 @@ static void collect_procs_file(const struct folio *folio,
 			add_to_kill_anon_file(t, page, vma, to_kill, addr);
 		}
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
 }
 
@@ -635,8 +631,7 @@ static void collect_procs_fsdax(const struct page *page,
 	struct task_struct *tsk;
 
 	i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_process(tsk) {
+	for_each_process_rculock(tsk) {
 		struct task_struct *t = tsk;
 
 		/*
@@ -653,7 +648,6 @@ static void collect_procs_fsdax(const struct page *page,
 				add_to_kill_fsdax(t, page, vma, to_kill, pgoff);
 		}
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_FS_DAX */
@@ -2288,8 +2282,7 @@ static void collect_procs_pfn(struct pfn_address_space *pfn_space,
 	struct address_space *mapping = pfn_space->mapping;
 
 	i_mmap_lock_read(mapping);
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_process(tsk) {
+	for_each_process_rculock(tsk) {
 		struct task_struct *t = tsk;
 
 		t = task_early_kill(tsk, true);
@@ -2303,7 +2296,6 @@ static void collect_procs_pfn(struct pfn_address_space *pfn_space,
 				add_to_kill_pgoff(t, vma, to_kill, pgoff);
 		}
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 	i_mmap_unlock_read(mapping);
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-21  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-21  9:20 [PATCH v4 00/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] " Ye Liu
2026-09-21  9:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] mm/oom_kill: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21  9:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 19:58   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] mm/ksm: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21  9:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 19:59   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21  9:20 ` Ye Liu [this message]
2026-09-21  9:55   ` [PATCH v4 04/15] mm/memory-failure: " sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] cpu/hotplug: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] freezer: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] hung_task: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] locking/lockdep: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] rcu: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 16:09   ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] sched: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] tracing/fgraph: convert process/thread iterator to for_each_process_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] unwind: " Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:20 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] fs: convert process/thread iterators to for_each_*_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] lib: convert process iterator to for_each_process_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 20:12   ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-09-21  9:33 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] security/landlock: convert thread iterator to for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu
2026-09-21 10:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  8:22 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] sched: introduce for_each_process_rculock and for_each_thread_rculock Ye Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260921092101.89285-5-ye.liu@linux.dev \
    --to=ye.liu@linux.dev \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=babu.moger@amd.com \
    --cc=boqun@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=chengming.zhou@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=gnoack3000@gmail.com \
    --cc=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
    --cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liuye@kylinos.cn \
    --cc=ljs@kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nao.horiguchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=qiang.zhang@linux.dev \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xu.xin16@zte.com.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.