Re: [PATCH v10 3/6] media: dt-bindings: Add Amlogic V4L2 video decoder

[sashiko-bot@kernel.org]

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] dt-bindings: amlogic,s4-vdec: missing interrupt-names in required list and example
- [Low] dt-bindings: amlogic,s4-vdec: unbounded array properties missing maxItems
--

commit ea1e1b5dce46c139b8fcb208da9bf35c4469463a
Author: Zhentao Guo <zhentao.guo@amlogic.com>

media: dt-bindings: Add Amlogic V4L2 video decoder
    
Add bindings for Amlogic hardware decoder accelerator.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/amlogic,s4-vdec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/amlogic,s4-vdec.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..751043c3d9ccf
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/amlogic,s4-vdec.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
[ ... ]
> +properties:
> +  compatible:
> +    const: amlogic,s4-vdec
> +
> +  reg:
> +    minItems: 2

[Severity: Low]
Should the reg property include a maxItems: 2 limit?

Since the reg-names property strictly enforces exactly 2 entries via its
items list, omitting maxItems: 2 allows the schema to incorrectly pass
validation for device trees with 3 or more entries.

> +
> +  reg-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: dos
> +      - const: dmc
> +
> +  interrupts:
> +    minItems: 2

[Severity: Low]
Is a maxItems: 2 limit missing for the interrupts property?

Since the interrupt-names property strictly enforces exactly 2 entries,
omitting maxItems: 2 allows device trees with 3 or more entries to pass schema
validation.

> +
> +  interrupt-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: hvdec
> +      - const: vdec
> +
[ ... ]
> +  power-domains:
> +    minItems: 2

[Severity: Low]
Should the power-domains property specify a maxItems: 2 limit?

Since the power-domain-names property strictly enforces exactly 2 entries,
omitting maxItems: 2 allows device trees with 3 or more entries to pass
validation.

> +
> +  power-domain-names:
> +    items:
> +      - const: vdec
> +      - const: hvdec
[ ... ]
> +required:
> +  - compatible
> +  - reg
> +  - reg-names
> +  - interrupts
> +  - clocks
> +  - clock-names
> +  - power-domains
> +  - power-domain-names
> +  - resets
> +  - amlogic,canvas
> +  - amlogic,secure-monitor

[Severity: Low]
Should interrupt-names be included in this required list?

The interrupt-names property is defined with exactly two items but is
omitted here. Since all other -names properties (reg-names, clock-names,
power-domain-names) are explicitly required, this omission allows incomplete
device tree nodes to pass schema validation.

> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> +  - |
> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-pll-clkc.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/amlogic,s4-peripherals-clkc.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/power/meson-s4-power.h>
> +    #include <dt-bindings/reset/amlogic,meson-s4-reset.h>
> +    video-codec@fe320000 {
> +      compatible = "amlogic,s4-vdec";
> +      reg = <0xfe320000 0x10000>,
> +            <0xfe036000 0x20>;
> +      reg-names = "dos",
> +                  "dmc";
> +      interrupts = <GIC_SPI 91 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> +                   <GIC_SPI 92 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;

[Severity: Low]
Should the device tree example include interrupt-names?

The example fails to provide interrupt-names, which reflects the omission in
the required list and results in an incomplete DT node.

> +      clocks = <&clkc_periphs CLKID_DOS>,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260924-b4-s4-vdec-upstream-v10-0-1289303a58a4@amlogic.com?part=3