From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Zorro Lang <zlang@kernel.org>,
fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 18:56:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260929015645.GL2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260924100855.2734089-10-hch@lst.de>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2026 at 12:07:50PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> To check both the metadata integrity and file system checksums after
> log replay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> tests/xfs/2304 | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/xfs/2304.out | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
> create mode 100755 tests/xfs/2304
> create mode 100644 tests/xfs/2304.out
>
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/2304 b/tests/xfs/2304
> new file mode 100755
> index 000000000000..ad4f45d79057
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/2304
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2016 Red Hat, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 2304
> +#
> +# Copied from generic/388, with added xfs_scrub -x calls for each iteration to
> +# verify the integrity of all file data and metadata.
> +#
> +# Test XFS log recovery ordering on v5 superblock filesystems. XFS had a problem
> +# where it would incorrectly replay older modifications from the log over more
> +# recent versions of metadata due to failure to update metadata LSNs during log
> +# recovery. This could result in false positive reports of corruption during log
> +# recovery and permanent mount failure.
> +#
> +# To test this situation, run frequent shutdowns immediately after log recovery.
> +# Ensure that log recovery does not recover stale modifications and cause
> +# spurious corruption reports and/or mount failures.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest shutdown auto log metadata recoveryloop datacsum
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_local_device $SCRATCH_DEV
> +_require_scratch_shutdown
> +
> +echo "Silence is golden."
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs >> $seqres.full 2>&1
> +_require_metadata_journaling $SCRATCH_DEV
> +_scratch_mount
> +_require_scratch_xfs_scrub
> +
> +while _soak_loop_running $((50 * TIME_FACTOR)); do
> + _run_fsstress_bg -d $SCRATCH_MNT -n 999999 -p 4
> +
> + # purposely include 0 second sleeps to test shutdown immediately after
> + # recovery
> + sleep $((RANDOM % 3))
> + _scratch_shutdown
> +
> + _kill_fsstress
> +
> + # Toggle between rw and ro mounts for recovery. Quit if any mount
> + # attempt fails so we don't shutdown the host fs.
> + if [ $((RANDOM % 2)) -eq 0 ]; then
> + _scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle mount failed"
> + else
> + _scratch_cycle_mount "ro" || _fail "cycle ro mount failed"
> + _scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle rw mount failed"
> + fi
> +
> + $XFS_SCRUB_PROG -x $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full 2>&1
I think we should just change generic/388 to run xfs_scrub after
recovery, and add -x if data checksums are enabled? That /would/ have
the effect of catching recovery errors (or scrub bugs) earlier.
Though I wonder how much that reduces the number of loop iterations over
a given SOAK_DURATION?
--D
> + if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then
> + _fail "scrub found errors"
> + fi
> +done
> +
> +# success, all done
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/2304.out b/tests/xfs/2304.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..07ee489db9fa
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/2304.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 2304
> +Silence is golden.
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-29 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 10:07 xfstests support for RT data checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 01/13] add a "datacsum" group Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:31 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 02/13] common: add a SCRATCH_MKFS_OPTIONS variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 03/13] xfs: add a XFS_VERIFY_FILE_DATA variable Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 04/13] xfs/206: filter out csum information from mkfs output Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 05/13] xfs: add a _require_xfs_data_csum helper Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:20 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 06/13] xfs/2301: test lazy bounce buffering mode Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:42 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 07/13] xfs/2302: add a basic data checksum test Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:48 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] xfs/2303: test that data checksums detect data misplacement Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] xfs/2304: version of generic/388 that run xfs_scrub -x for each iteration Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:56 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-10-05 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 14:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-05 15:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-07 13:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-10-07 15:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] xfs/2305: version of generic/475 " Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:57 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 11/13] xfs/2306: test mkfs input validation for RT data csum options Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 1:59 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 12/13] xfs/2307: test checksum handling using corrupted checksums Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 2:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-24 10:07 ` [PATCH 13/13] xfs/2308: test rebuilding of csum files in xfs_repair Christoph Hellwig
2026-09-29 2:03 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-05 13:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260929015645.GL2705364@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.