linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree

linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree

[Mark Brown]

Hi all,

After merging the landlock tree, today's linux-next arm64 kunit failed
like this:

[00:12:55] ============================================================
[00:12:55] ================ landlock_cap (5 subtests) =================
[00:12:55] # test_cap_to_bit_invalid: EXPECTATION FAILED at security/landlock/cap.c:113
[00:12:55] Expected kunit_suppressed_warning_count(__kunit_suppress) == 1, but
[00:12:55]     kunit_suppressed_warning_count(__kunit_suppress) == 2 (0x2)
[00:12:55] [FAILED] test_cap_to_bit_invalid
[00:12:55]     # module: landlock
[00:12:55] # landlock_cap: pass:4 fail:1 skip:0 total:5
[00:12:55] # Totals: pass:4 fail:1 skip:0 total:5
[00:12:55] ================== [FAILED] landlock_cap ===================
[00:12:55] ============================================================

Caused by commit

   b6a56b30b9d5a (landlock: Enforce capability restrictions)

Due to the prior build failures I have merged the version from
next-20261001 instead.

Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree

[Mark Brown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 202 bytes --]

On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 01:31:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the landlock tree, today's linux-next arm64 kunit failed
> like this:

This issue is still present today.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: test failure after merge of the landlock tree

[Mickaël Salaün]

On Mon, Oct 19, 2026 at 07:17:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2026 at 01:31:03AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the landlock tree, today's linux-next arm64 kunit failed
> > like this:
> 
> This issue is still present today.

I removed these wrong kunit checks Friday so it should be good now, but
I notice that linux-next still has the next-20261001/landlock merge
commit instead of the latest changes from mic/next (which should not
conflict).  Could you please confirm that a normal merge works?

Regards,
 Mickaël