All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 12/12] perf test: Skip the LBR inline unwinding check when unsupported
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 12:05:53 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113150555.1163049-13-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113150555.1163049-1-acme@kernel.org>

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

The check only looks for the PMU's caps/branches file before recording
with --call-graph lbr.  AMD BRS advertises branches but only samples its
own retired branches event, so the record with cycles is rejected and
the test fails instead of skipping.

Probe the record and skip when it fails, as the branch stack test does.

Fixes: 54a23bff770961e0 ("perf test: Test addr2line unwinding works with inline functions")
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh | 9 ++++++++-
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh
index e8754ef2d7f21ac2..6fe47909dae4f812 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh
@@ -71,7 +71,14 @@ test_lbr() {
     fi
 
     # Record data. Currently only dwarf callchains support inlined functions.
-    perf record --call-graph lbr -e cycles:u -o "${perf_data}" -- perf test -w inlineloop 1
+    # Some PMUs advertise branches but reject branch sampling for cycles, e.g.
+    # AMD BRS, which only samples its own retired branches event.
+    if ! perf record --call-graph lbr -e cycles:u -o "${perf_data}" -- \
+            perf test -w inlineloop 1 2>/dev/null
+    then
+        echo "Skip: LBR not supported by the PMU"
+        return
+    fi
 
     # Check output with inline (default) and srcline
     perf script -i "${perf_data}" --fields +srcline > "${perf_script_txt}"
-- 
2.56.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-11-13 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-13 15:05 [PATCH v1 0/12] perf coverage: A harness for perf, and the fixes it found Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] perf scripts: Add a coverage harness for perf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:23   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] perf annotate-data: Resolve DW_OP_addrx global variables Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] perf tests: Exercise the flexible array member path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] perf annotate-data: Count flexible array accesses for the whole struct Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] perf tests: Exercise data type resolution from a register Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] perf annotate: Print the stats after the annotations Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] perf tests: Silence the libbfd probe in build-test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] perf build: Record the display-only features in FEATURE-DUMP Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] perf cs-etm: Fall back to the recorded instruction size on a failed read Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:15   ` Leo Yan
2026-11-13 15:20     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] perf tests: Fix the Intel PT virtual LBR check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] perf test: Drop samples without an IP in the dlfilter test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-11-13 15:16   ` [PATCH v1 12/12] perf test: Skip the LBR inline unwinding check when unsupported sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261113150555.1163049-13-acme@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.