From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 06/12] perf annotate: Print the stats after the annotations
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 12:05:47 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261113150555.1163049-7-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261113150555.1163049-1-acme@kernel.org>
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
The instruction stats are printed before the loop that accounts them,
so 'perf annotate --code-with-type --insn-stat' always shows zeros.
The data type counters are updated in --code-with-type mode too, but
only --data-type mode accounts their total, so they are incomplete
there.
Print both after the annotation loops, the data type part only with
--data-type.
Fixes: 58824fa0087e1cb7 ("perf annotate: Add --insn-stat option for debugging")
Fixes: 61a9741e9f78c64c ("perf annotate: Add --type-stat option for debugging")
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 10 ++--
tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100755 tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 331adbdbd635917d..973f4950abd6f917 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -414,11 +414,6 @@ static void hists__find_annotations(struct hists *hists,
struct rb_node *nd = rb_first_cached(&hists->entries), *next;
int key = K_RIGHT;
- if (ann->type_stat)
- print_annotate_data_stat(&ann_data_stat);
- if (ann->insn_stat)
- print_annotate_item_stat(&ann_insn_stat, "Instruction");
-
while (nd) {
struct hist_entry *he = rb_entry(nd, struct hist_entry, rb_node);
struct annotation *notes;
@@ -660,6 +655,11 @@ static int __cmd_annotate(struct perf_annotate *ann)
hists__find_annotations(hists, pos, ann);
}
+ if (ann->data_type && ann->type_stat)
+ print_annotate_data_stat(&ann_data_stat);
+ if (ann->insn_stat)
+ print_annotate_item_stat(&ann_insn_stat, "Instruction");
+
if (use_browser == 2) {
void (*show_annotations)(void);
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000000000000..82d2becdff141138
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/annotate_stats.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+#!/bin/bash
+# perf annotate instruction stats test
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+set -e
+
+perfdata=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.data.XXXXX)
+perfout=$(mktemp /tmp/__perf_test.perf.out.XXXXX)
+
+cleanup()
+{
+ rm -f "$perfdata" "$perfout"
+ trap - EXIT TERM INT
+}
+
+trap_cleanup()
+{
+ echo "Unexpected signal in ${FUNCNAME[1]}"
+ cleanup
+ exit 1
+}
+trap trap_cleanup EXIT TERM INT
+
+# No point in recording if the PMU cannot do memory events.
+if perf mem record -o /dev/null -- true 2>&1 | \
+ grep -q "failed: no PMU supports the memory events"; then
+ cleanup
+ exit 2
+fi
+if ! perf mem record -o /dev/null -- true 2>/dev/null; then
+ echo "Skip: cannot record memory events on this PMU"
+ cleanup
+ exit 2
+fi
+
+if ! perf mem record -o "$perfdata" -- perf test -w datasym > /dev/null 2>&1; then
+ echo "FAIL: perf mem record"
+ cleanup
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+if ! perf annotate --code-with-type --insn-stat -i "$perfdata" --stdio \
+ --percent-limit 1 > "$perfout" 2>/dev/null; then
+ echo "FAIL: perf annotate"
+ cleanup
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+# The instruction stats are accounted while the instructions are
+# displayed; printing them before the display loop shows zeros.
+if ! grep -Eq '^total [1-9][0-9]*,' "$perfout"; then
+ echo "FAIL: instruction stats not accounted"
+ cleanup
+ exit 1
+fi
+
+echo "instruction stats accounted"
+cleanup
--
2.56.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-13 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-13 15:05 [PATCH v1 0/12] perf coverage: A harness for perf, and the fixes it found Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 01/12] perf scripts: Add a coverage harness for perf Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 02/12] perf annotate-data: Resolve DW_OP_addrx global variables Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 03/12] perf tests: Exercise the flexible array member path Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 04/12] perf annotate-data: Count flexible array accesses for the whole struct Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 05/12] perf tests: Exercise data type resolution from a register Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-11-13 15:24 ` [PATCH v1 06/12] perf annotate: Print the stats after the annotations sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 07/12] perf tests: Silence the libbfd probe in build-test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 08/12] perf build: Record the display-only features in FEATURE-DUMP Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 09/12] perf cs-etm: Fall back to the recorded instruction size on a failed read Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:15 ` Leo Yan
2026-11-13 15:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 10/12] perf tests: Fix the Intel PT virtual LBR check Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 11/12] perf test: Drop samples without an IP in the dlfilter test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-13 15:05 ` [PATCH v1 12/12] perf test: Skip the LBR inline unwinding check when unsupported Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-11-13 15:16 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261113150555.1163049-7-acme@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.