From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@broadcom.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
brcm80211-dev-list <brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
hauke@hauke-m.de
Subject: Re: using DMA-API on ARM
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2048819.2EPzBi8E3T@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5485D054.7090109@broadcom.com>
On Monday 08 December 2014 17:22:44 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> The log: first the ring allocation info is printed. Starting at
> >> 16.124847, ring 2, 3 and 4 are rings used for device to host. In this
> >> log the failure is on a read of ring 3. Ring 3 is 1024 entries of each
> >> 16 bytes. The next thing printed is the kernel page tables. Then some
> >> OpenWRT info and the logging of part of the connection setup. Then at
> >> 1780.130752 the logging of the failure starts. The sequence number is
> >> modulo 253 with ring size of 1024 matches an "old" entry (read 40,
> >> expected 52). Then the different pointers are printed followed by
> >> the kernel page table. The code does then a cache invalidate on the
> >> dma_handle and the next read the sequence number is correct.
> >
> > How do you invalidate the cache? A dma_handle is of type dma_addr_t
> > and we don't define an operation for that, nor does it make sense
> > on an allocation from dma_alloc_coherent(). What happens if you
> > take out the invalidate?
>
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(, DMA_FROM_DEVICE) which ends up invalidating
> the cache (or that is our suspicion).
I'm not sure about that:
static void arm_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
dma_addr_t handle, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
unsigned int offset = handle & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle-offset));
__dma_page_dev_to_cpu(page, offset, size, dir);
}
Assuming a noncoherent linear (no IOMMU, no swiotlb, no dmabounce) mapping,
dma_to_pfn will return the correct pfn here, but pfn_to_page will return a
page pointer into the kernel linear mapping, which is not the same
as the pointer you get from __alloc_remap_buffer(). The pointer that
was returned from dma_alloc_coherent is a) non-cachable, and b) not the
same that you flush here.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: using DMA-API on ARM
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2048819.2EPzBi8E3T@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5485D054.7090109@broadcom.com>
On Monday 08 December 2014 17:22:44 Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >> The log: first the ring allocation info is printed. Starting at
> >> 16.124847, ring 2, 3 and 4 are rings used for device to host. In this
> >> log the failure is on a read of ring 3. Ring 3 is 1024 entries of each
> >> 16 bytes. The next thing printed is the kernel page tables. Then some
> >> OpenWRT info and the logging of part of the connection setup. Then at
> >> 1780.130752 the logging of the failure starts. The sequence number is
> >> modulo 253 with ring size of 1024 matches an "old" entry (read 40,
> >> expected 52). Then the different pointers are printed followed by
> >> the kernel page table. The code does then a cache invalidate on the
> >> dma_handle and the next read the sequence number is correct.
> >
> > How do you invalidate the cache? A dma_handle is of type dma_addr_t
> > and we don't define an operation for that, nor does it make sense
> > on an allocation from dma_alloc_coherent(). What happens if you
> > take out the invalidate?
>
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(, DMA_FROM_DEVICE) which ends up invalidating
> the cache (or that is our suspicion).
I'm not sure about that:
static void arm_dma_sync_single_for_cpu(struct device *dev,
dma_addr_t handle, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir)
{
unsigned int offset = handle & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
struct page *page = pfn_to_page(dma_to_pfn(dev, handle-offset));
__dma_page_dev_to_cpu(page, offset, size, dir);
}
Assuming a noncoherent linear (no IOMMU, no swiotlb, no dmabounce) mapping,
dma_to_pfn will return the correct pfn here, but pfn_to_page will return a
page pointer into the kernel linear mapping, which is not the same
as the pointer you get from __alloc_remap_buffer(). The pointer that
was returned from dma_alloc_coherent is a) non-cachable, and b) not the
same that you flush here.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-08 16:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-05 9:22 using DMA-API on ARM Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 9:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 9:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 9:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 12:24 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-05 12:24 ` Will Deacon
2014-12-05 12:56 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-05 12:56 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-05 13:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 13:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 14:20 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-05 14:20 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-05 14:47 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 14:47 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-08 13:47 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-08 13:47 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-08 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 15:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-08 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-08 15:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 15:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-08 16:03 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-08 17:01 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-08 17:01 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-09 10:19 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-09 10:19 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-09 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-09 10:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-09 11:07 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-09 11:07 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-09 11:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-09 11:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-01-20 15:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2015-01-20 15:22 ` Fabio Estevam
2014-12-08 16:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-08 16:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-08 16:38 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-12-08 16:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-08 16:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-08 16:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-08 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-08 16:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-08 16:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-08 16:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 15:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 15:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 19:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 19:22 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 19:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 19:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 12:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 12:43 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 12:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 12:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-05 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-05 11:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 11:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 11:49 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-05 11:49 ` Hante Meuleman
2014-12-05 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 17:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 18:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-05 18:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 18:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-05 19:50 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-05 19:50 ` Arend van Spriel
2014-12-08 12:55 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2014-12-08 12:55 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2014-12-08 15:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-08 15:55 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-08 16:50 ` Johannes Stezenbach
2014-12-08 16:50 ` Johannes Stezenbach
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2048819.2EPzBi8E3T@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.