From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@st.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
"linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@st.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
Mickael REULIER <mickael.reulier@st.com>,
Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@st.com>,
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: Adopt SPDX identifiers
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:32:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2205915.z0ubSpqczI@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bf185e2-9b02-3632-dc9a-baf8f4109b44@st.com>
Hi Philippe,
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 12:25:51 EET Philippe CORNU wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 12:30 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday, 22 January 2018 12:26:08 EET Philippe Cornu wrote:
> >> Add SPDX identifiers to the Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI
> >> host controller driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 6 +-----
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c index
> >> 46b0e73404d1..e06836dec77c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> @@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > According to Documentation/process/license-rules.txt this would change
> > the existing license. The correct identifier is GPL-2.0+.
>
> You are right, I did not put the correct identifier :(
>
> After reading more spdx.org, I wonder if the correct value should be
> GPL-2.0-or-later instead of GPL-2.0+
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-or-later.html
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0+.html
>
> What is your opinion?
I agree in principle, and I've even asked for that before, but I've been told
that we should stick to the license identifiers defined in Documentation/
process/license-rules.txt. The file might get updated to use GPL-2.0-or-later
and GPL-2.0-only later, and kernel sources will likely then get patched in one
go.
> >> /*
> >> * Copyright (c) 2016, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> >> * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics SA 2017
> >> *
> >> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >> - * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> - * (at your option) any later version.
> >> - *
> >> * Modified by Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> >> * This generic Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host driver is based on the
> >> * Rockchip version from rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c with phy & bridge APIs.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: Adopt SPDX identifiers
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:32:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2205915.z0ubSpqczI@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bf185e2-9b02-3632-dc9a-baf8f4109b44@st.com>
Hi Philippe,
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 12:25:51 EET Philippe CORNU wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 12:30 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday, 22 January 2018 12:26:08 EET Philippe Cornu wrote:
> >> Add SPDX identifiers to the Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI
> >> host controller driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 6 +-----
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c index
> >> 46b0e73404d1..e06836dec77c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> @@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > According to Documentation/process/license-rules.txt this would change
> > the existing license. The correct identifier is GPL-2.0+.
>
> You are right, I did not put the correct identifier :(
>
> After reading more spdx.org, I wonder if the correct value should be
> GPL-2.0-or-later instead of GPL-2.0+
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-or-later.html
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0+.html
>
> What is your opinion?
I agree in principle, and I've even asked for that before, but I've been told
that we should stick to the license identifiers defined in Documentation/
process/license-rules.txt. The file might get updated to use GPL-2.0-or-later
and GPL-2.0-only later, and kernel sources will likely then get patched in one
go.
> >> /*
> >> * Copyright (c) 2016, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> >> * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics SA 2017
> >> *
> >> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >> - * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> - * (at your option) any later version.
> >> - *
> >> * Modified by Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> >> * This generic Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host driver is based on the
> >> * Rockchip version from rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c with phy & bridge APIs.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@st.com>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@codeaurora.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org>,
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sandy Huang <hjc@rock-chips.com>, Heiko Stubner <heiko@sntech.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@st.com>,
Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@st.com>,
Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Ludovic BARRE <ludovic.barre@st.com>,
Mickael REULIER <mickael.reulier@st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: Adopt SPDX identifiers
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:32:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2205915.z0ubSpqczI@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2bf185e2-9b02-3632-dc9a-baf8f4109b44@st.com>
Hi Philippe,
On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 12:25:51 EET Philippe CORNU wrote:
> On 01/23/2018 12:30 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Monday, 22 January 2018 12:26:08 EET Philippe Cornu wrote:
> >> Add SPDX identifiers to the Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI
> >> host controller driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c | 6 +-----
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c index
> >> 46b0e73404d1..e06836dec77c 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/synopsys/dw-mipi-dsi.c
> >> @@ -1,12 +1,8 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > According to Documentation/process/license-rules.txt this would change
> > the existing license. The correct identifier is GPL-2.0+.
>
> You are right, I did not put the correct identifier :(
>
> After reading more spdx.org, I wonder if the correct value should be
> GPL-2.0-or-later instead of GPL-2.0+
>
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-or-later.html
> https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0+.html
>
> What is your opinion?
I agree in principle, and I've even asked for that before, but I've been told
that we should stick to the license identifiers defined in Documentation/
process/license-rules.txt. The file might get updated to use GPL-2.0-or-later
and GPL-2.0-only later, and kernel sources will likely then get patched in one
go.
> >> /*
> >> * Copyright (c) 2016, Fuzhou Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd
> >> * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics SA 2017
> >> *
> >> - * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> - * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >> - * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> - * (at your option) any later version.
> >> - *
> >> * Modified by Philippe Cornu <philippe.cornu@st.com>
> >> * This generic Synopsys DesignWare MIPI DSI host driver is based on the
> >> * Rockchip version from rockchip/dw-mipi-dsi.c with phy & bridge APIs.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-23 23:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-22 10:26 [PATCH] drm/bridge/synopsys: dsi: Adopt SPDX identifiers Philippe Cornu
2018-01-22 10:26 ` Philippe Cornu
2018-01-22 10:26 ` Philippe Cornu
2018-01-22 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-01-22 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-01-22 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-01-23 10:25 ` Philippe CORNU
2018-01-23 10:25 ` Philippe CORNU
2018-01-23 10:25 ` Philippe CORNU
2018-01-23 23:32 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2018-01-23 23:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-01-23 23:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-01-24 8:57 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-01-24 8:57 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-01-24 8:57 ` Benjamin Gaignard
2018-02-08 14:09 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-08 14:09 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-08 14:09 ` Philippe Ombredanne
2018-02-08 15:05 ` Philippe CORNU
2018-02-08 15:05 ` Philippe CORNU
2018-02-08 15:05 ` Philippe CORNU
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2205915.z0ubSpqczI@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=bhumirks@gmail.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=ludovic.barre@st.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mickael.reulier@st.com \
--cc=philippe.cornu@st.com \
--cc=vincent.abriou@st.com \
--cc=yannick.fertre@st.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.