From: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru requirement
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2236749.301RoY5kYM@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8553b0cd-95e4-c3db-c75a-d3b28e99f131@arm.com>
On Freitag, 15. Oktober 2021 19:44:56 CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-10-15 15:31, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > The behaviour described in the bindings is exactly the opposite
> > of what it should be, so this patch fixes the description and
> > adjusts the if conditions for adding rockchip,cru to required.
> >
> > Fixes: 510f1c133aed ("ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: add i2s-tdm bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml index
> > ce3e18b50230..93f5221e9381 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> >
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ properties:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > description:
> > The phandle of the cru.
> >
> > - Required if neither trcm-sync-tx-only nor trcm-sync-rx-only are
> > specified. + Required if either trcm-sync-tx-only or
> > trcm-sync-rx-only are specified.>
> > rockchip,grf:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > @@ -147,8 +147,13 @@ required:
> > allOf:
> > - if:
> > properties:
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> > + then:
> > + required:
> > + - rockchip,cru
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> FWIW, isn't this just a long-winded way to say
>
> if:
> anyOf:
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> which itself could still be more concisely
>
> if:
> not:
> properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
>
> ?
Hi Robin,
you are absolutely correct. I'm not very familiar with dtschema yet,
so I mostly just did what I know would work, as I didn't know about
"not" or "anyOf" in this context.
However I don't think this patch is going to get a V2 because I may
have found a way to easily get rid of the CRU property altogether,
making this patch sort of obsolete in the very near future.
Thank you for your review nonetheless, I learned some more dtschema
today thanks to it. :)
>
> Robin.
>
> > then:
> > required:
> > - rockchip,cru
Regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru requirement
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2236749.301RoY5kYM@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8553b0cd-95e4-c3db-c75a-d3b28e99f131@arm.com>
On Freitag, 15. Oktober 2021 19:44:56 CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-10-15 15:31, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > The behaviour described in the bindings is exactly the opposite
> > of what it should be, so this patch fixes the description and
> > adjusts the if conditions for adding rockchip,cru to required.
> >
> > Fixes: 510f1c133aed ("ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: add i2s-tdm bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml index
> > ce3e18b50230..93f5221e9381 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> >
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ properties:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > description:
> > The phandle of the cru.
> >
> > - Required if neither trcm-sync-tx-only nor trcm-sync-rx-only are
> > specified. + Required if either trcm-sync-tx-only or
> > trcm-sync-rx-only are specified.>
> > rockchip,grf:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > @@ -147,8 +147,13 @@ required:
> > allOf:
> > - if:
> > properties:
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> > + then:
> > + required:
> > + - rockchip,cru
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> FWIW, isn't this just a long-winded way to say
>
> if:
> anyOf:
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> which itself could still be more concisely
>
> if:
> not:
> properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
>
> ?
Hi Robin,
you are absolutely correct. I'm not very familiar with dtschema yet,
so I mostly just did what I know would work, as I didn't know about
"not" or "anyOf" in this context.
However I don't think this patch is going to get a V2 because I may
have found a way to easily get rid of the CRU property altogether,
making this patch sort of obsolete in the very near future.
Thank you for your review nonetheless, I learned some more dtschema
today thanks to it. :)
>
> Robin.
>
> > then:
> > required:
> > - rockchip,cru
Regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru requirement
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2236749.301RoY5kYM@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8553b0cd-95e4-c3db-c75a-d3b28e99f131@arm.com>
On Freitag, 15. Oktober 2021 19:44:56 CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-10-15 15:31, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > The behaviour described in the bindings is exactly the opposite
> > of what it should be, so this patch fixes the description and
> > adjusts the if conditions for adding rockchip,cru to required.
> >
> > Fixes: 510f1c133aed ("ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: add i2s-tdm bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml index
> > ce3e18b50230..93f5221e9381 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> >
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ properties:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > description:
> > The phandle of the cru.
> >
> > - Required if neither trcm-sync-tx-only nor trcm-sync-rx-only are
> > specified. + Required if either trcm-sync-tx-only or
> > trcm-sync-rx-only are specified.>
> > rockchip,grf:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > @@ -147,8 +147,13 @@ required:
> > allOf:
> > - if:
> > properties:
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> > + then:
> > + required:
> > + - rockchip,cru
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> FWIW, isn't this just a long-winded way to say
>
> if:
> anyOf:
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> which itself could still be more concisely
>
> if:
> not:
> properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
>
> ?
Hi Robin,
you are absolutely correct. I'm not very familiar with dtschema yet,
so I mostly just did what I know would work, as I didn't know about
"not" or "anyOf" in this context.
However I don't think this patch is going to get a V2 because I may
have found a way to easily get rid of the CRU property altogether,
making this patch sort of obsolete in the very near future.
Thank you for your review nonetheless, I learned some more dtschema
today thanks to it. :)
>
> Robin.
>
> > then:
> > required:
> > - rockchip,cru
Regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru requirement
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 23:33:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2236749.301RoY5kYM@archbook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8553b0cd-95e4-c3db-c75a-d3b28e99f131@arm.com>
On Freitag, 15. Oktober 2021 19:44:56 CEST Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2021-10-15 15:31, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > The behaviour described in the bindings is exactly the opposite
> > of what it should be, so this patch fixes the description and
> > adjusts the if conditions for adding rockchip,cru to required.
> >
> > Fixes: 510f1c133aed ("ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: add i2s-tdm bindings")
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > .../devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml | 11 ++++++++---
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml index
> > ce3e18b50230..93f5221e9381 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip,i2s-tdm.yaml
> >
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ properties:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > description:
> > The phandle of the cru.
> >
> > - Required if neither trcm-sync-tx-only nor trcm-sync-rx-only are
> > specified. + Required if either trcm-sync-tx-only or
> > trcm-sync-rx-only are specified.>
> > rockchip,grf:
> > $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> >
> > @@ -147,8 +147,13 @@ required:
> > allOf:
> > - if:
> > properties:
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> > - rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> > + then:
> > + required:
> > + - rockchip,cru
> > + - if:
> > + properties:
> > + rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> FWIW, isn't this just a long-winded way to say
>
> if:
> anyOf:
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: true
> - properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: true
>
> which itself could still be more concisely
>
> if:
> not:
> properties:
> rockchip,trcm-sync-tx-only: false
> rockchip,trcm-sync-rx-only: false
>
> ?
Hi Robin,
you are absolutely correct. I'm not very familiar with dtschema yet,
so I mostly just did what I know would work, as I didn't know about
"not" or "anyOf" in this context.
However I don't think this patch is going to get a V2 because I may
have found a way to easily get rid of the CRU property altogether,
making this patch sort of obsolete in the very near future.
Thank you for your review nonetheless, I learned some more dtschema
today thanks to it. :)
>
> Robin.
>
> > then:
> > required:
> > - rockchip,cru
Regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-15 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-15 14:31 [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru requirement Nicolas Frattaroli
2021-10-15 14:31 ` [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip,cru requirement Nicolas Frattaroli
2021-10-15 14:31 ` [PATCH] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: i2s-tdm: fix rockchip, cru requirement Nicolas Frattaroli
2021-10-15 14:31 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2021-10-15 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-15 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-15 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-15 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-15 21:33 ` Nicolas Frattaroli [this message]
2021-10-15 21:33 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2021-10-15 21:33 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2021-10-15 21:33 ` Nicolas Frattaroli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2236749.301RoY5kYM@archbook \
--to=frattaroli.nicolas@gmail.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.