From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>
To: <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
<Daire.McNamara@microchip.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:03:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22d74656-3243-82be-8475-6ed72eaaf35b@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220914195946.eadkppkgqwgwdace@pengutronix.de>
On 14/09/2022 20:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> there are no phandles on that PWM, so there is nothing that needs a
> followup adaption.
> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Hey Uwe,
Thanks for checking the pwm consumers :)
I assume you going to take the corresponding binding change via
either pwm-fixes or pwm-for-next, I think you can take the dts too, I
don't think the dependency I previously thought existed exists.
For that purpose:
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks,
Conor.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>
To: <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: <thierry.reding@gmail.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
<Daire.McNamara@microchip.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 07:03:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22d74656-3243-82be-8475-6ed72eaaf35b@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220914195946.eadkppkgqwgwdace@pengutronix.de>
On 14/09/2022 20:59, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> there are no phandles on that PWM, so there is nothing that needs a
> followup adaption.
> Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Hey Uwe,
Thanks for checking the pwm consumers :)
I assume you going to take the corresponding binding change via
either pwm-fixes or pwm-for-next, I think you can take the dts too, I
don't think the dependency I previously thought existed exists.
For that purpose:
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Thanks,
Conor.
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-15 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 9:12 [PATCH v10 0/4] Microchip soft ip corePWM driver Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` [PATCH v10 1/4] dt-bindings: pwm: fix microchip corePWM's pwm-cells Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` [PATCH v10 2/4] riscv: dts: fix the icicle's #pwm-cells Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-14 19:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-14 19:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-15 7:03 ` Conor.Dooley [this message]
2022-09-15 7:03 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` [PATCH v10 3/4] pwm: add microchip soft ip corePWM driver Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-15 7:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-15 7:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-19 12:53 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-19 12:53 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-19 13:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-19 13:50 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-19 14:29 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-19 14:29 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 7:11 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 7:11 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 9:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-30 9:13 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-30 9:45 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 9:45 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 13:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-30 13:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-30 13:49 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 13:49 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-30 14:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-30 14:06 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-08-24 9:12 ` [PATCH v10 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add pwm to PolarFire SoC entry Conor Dooley
2022-08-24 9:12 ` Conor Dooley
2022-09-14 20:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-09-14 20:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22d74656-3243-82be-8475-6ed72eaaf35b@microchip.com \
--to=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=Daire.McNamara@microchip.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.