From: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
To: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com,
linux@roeck-us.net, jic23@kernel.org, knaack.h@gmx.de,
lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org,
lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with late_initcall
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:00:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2324970.FJcTUYNoO2@ws-stein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed5c1761-bdc7-df9c-96c8-998e83c49c4c@free-electrons.com>
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 11:33:59, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> On 26/07/2016 11:05, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:24:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >> On 26/07/2016 10:21, Alexander Stein wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 09:43:44, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >>>> iio_channel_get_all returns -ENODEV when it cannot find either phandles
> >>>> and
> >>>> properties in the Device Tree or channels whose consumer_dev_name
> >>>> matches
> >>>> iio_hwmon in iio_map_list. The iio_map_list is filled in by iio drivers
> >>>> which might be probed after iio_hwmon.
> >>>
> >>> Would it work if iio_channel_get_all returning ENODEV is used for
> >>> returning
> >>> EPROBE_DEFER in iio_channel_get_all? Using late initcalls for
> >>> driver/device
> >>> dependencies seems not right for me at this place.
> >>
> >> Then what if the iio_channel_get_all is called outside of the probe of a
> >> driver? We'll have to change the error code, things we are apparently
> >> trying to avoid (see v2 patches' discussions).
> >
> > Maybe I didn't express my idea enough. I don't want to change the behavior
> > of iio_channel_get_all at all. Just the result evaluation of
> > iio_channel_get_all in iio_hwmon_probe. I have something link the patch
> > below in mind.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexander
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> > index b550ba5..e32d150 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> > @@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ static int iio_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > name = dev->of_node->name;
> >
> > channels = iio_channel_get_all(dev);
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR(channels))
> > - return PTR_ERR(channels);
> > + if (IS_ERR(channels)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(channels) == -ENODEV)
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + else
> > + return PTR_ERR(channels);
> > + }
> >
> > st = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (st == NULL) {
>
> Indeed, I misunderstood what you told me.
>
> Actually, the patch you proposed is part of my v1
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/28/203) and v2
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/15/215).
> Jonathan and Guenter didn't really like the idea of changing the -ENODEV
> in -EPROBE_DEFER.
Thanks for the links.
> What I thought you were proposing was to change the -ENODEV return code
> inside iio_channel_get_all. This cannot be an option since the function
> might be called outside of a probe (it is not yet, but might be in the
> future?).
AFAICS this is a helper function not knowing about device probing itself. And
it should stay at that.
> Of what I understood, two possibilities are then possible (proposed
> either by Guenter or Jonathan): either rework the iio framework to
> register iio map array earlier or to use late_initcall instead of init
> for the driver consuming the iio channels.
Interestingly using this problem would not arise due to module dependencies.
But using late_initcall would mean this needs to be done on any driver using
iio channels? I would rather keep those consumers simple.
Best regards,
Alexander
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com (Alexander Stein)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with late_initcall
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 12:00:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2324970.FJcTUYNoO2@ws-stein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed5c1761-bdc7-df9c-96c8-998e83c49c4c@free-electrons.com>
On Tuesday 26 July 2016 11:33:59, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> On 26/07/2016 11:05, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:24:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >> On 26/07/2016 10:21, Alexander Stein wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 09:43:44, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> >>>> iio_channel_get_all returns -ENODEV when it cannot find either phandles
> >>>> and
> >>>> properties in the Device Tree or channels whose consumer_dev_name
> >>>> matches
> >>>> iio_hwmon in iio_map_list. The iio_map_list is filled in by iio drivers
> >>>> which might be probed after iio_hwmon.
> >>>
> >>> Would it work if iio_channel_get_all returning ENODEV is used for
> >>> returning
> >>> EPROBE_DEFER in iio_channel_get_all? Using late initcalls for
> >>> driver/device
> >>> dependencies seems not right for me at this place.
> >>
> >> Then what if the iio_channel_get_all is called outside of the probe of a
> >> driver? We'll have to change the error code, things we are apparently
> >> trying to avoid (see v2 patches' discussions).
> >
> > Maybe I didn't express my idea enough. I don't want to change the behavior
> > of iio_channel_get_all at all. Just the result evaluation of
> > iio_channel_get_all in iio_hwmon_probe. I have something link the patch
> > below in mind.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Alexander
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> > index b550ba5..e32d150 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
> > @@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ static int iio_hwmon_probe(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> >
> > name = dev->of_node->name;
> >
> > channels = iio_channel_get_all(dev);
> >
> > - if (IS_ERR(channels))
> > - return PTR_ERR(channels);
> > + if (IS_ERR(channels)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(channels) == -ENODEV)
> > + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + else
> > + return PTR_ERR(channels);
> > + }
> >
> > st = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (st == NULL) {
>
> Indeed, I misunderstood what you told me.
>
> Actually, the patch you proposed is part of my v1
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/28/203) and v2
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/15/215).
> Jonathan and Guenter didn't really like the idea of changing the -ENODEV
> in -EPROBE_DEFER.
Thanks for the links.
> What I thought you were proposing was to change the -ENODEV return code
> inside iio_channel_get_all. This cannot be an option since the function
> might be called outside of a probe (it is not yet, but might be in the
> future?).
AFAICS this is a helper function not knowing about device probing itself. And
it should stay at that.
> Of what I understood, two possibilities are then possible (proposed
> either by Guenter or Jonathan): either rework the iio framework to
> register iio map array earlier or to use late_initcall instead of init
> for the driver consuming the iio channels.
Interestingly using this problem would not arise due to module dependencies.
But using late_initcall would mean this needs to be done on any driver using
iio channels? I would rather keep those consumers simple.
Best regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-26 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 7:43 [PATCH v3 0/4] add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with late_initcall Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-26 7:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-26 7:55 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:55 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 8:21 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 8:21 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 8:24 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 8:24 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 9:05 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 9:05 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 9:33 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 9:33 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 10:00 ` Alexander Stein [this message]
2016-07-26 10:00 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 10:07 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 10:07 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 16:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-07-26 16:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-08-15 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 17:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-08-15 17:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-08-15 21:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 21:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 21:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-09-01 7:15 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-09-01 7:15 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-09-01 9:03 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-09-01 9:03 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-09-03 19:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-09-03 19:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mfd: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-29 6:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-07-29 6:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mfd: mfd-core: reattach mfd of_node to cells without of_compatible Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-09 13:48 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-09 13:48 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-24 6:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-24 6:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-31 11:56 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-31 11:56 ` Lee Jones
2016-09-01 8:35 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-09-01 8:35 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iio: adc: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-29 7:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-07-29 7:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-04 8:41 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-04 8:41 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-24 6:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-24 6:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-04 9:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 9:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 10:27 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-04 10:27 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-21 19:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-21 19:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2324970.FJcTUYNoO2@ws-stein \
--to=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.