From: <Lewis.Hanly@microchip.com>
To: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>,
<brgl@bgdev.pl>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
<maz@kernel.org>, <Daire.McNamara@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] gpio: mpfs: add polarfire soc gpio support
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:45:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23d74882a69b39025005495886faec3e5b129ba7.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZqvEvqjzTN3oQqrV_CNK+D2+c4FjLiC1_ZoKQ-rMMe5A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 15:19 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:51 AM <Lewis.Hanly@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> > We had looked at the bpgpio_init, our controller is not fully
> > memory
> > mapped to support the bgpio_init() and get all routines for free.
> > While we have in/out and intr (interrupt state) 32-bit registers,
> > we
> > would not get as much free as other generic memory mapped
> > controllers.
>
> You're not really saying what the problem is?
>
> Is it that some registers are not one-bit-indexed from 0 per GPIO?
Yes some of the registers are not one-bit-indexed per GPIO and for this
reason we had not implemented bgpio_init().
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: <Lewis.Hanly@microchip.com>
To: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>,
<brgl@bgdev.pl>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
<maz@kernel.org>, <Daire.McNamara@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/1] gpio: mpfs: add polarfire soc gpio support
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2022 10:45:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <23d74882a69b39025005495886faec3e5b129ba7.camel@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZqvEvqjzTN3oQqrV_CNK+D2+c4FjLiC1_ZoKQ-rMMe5A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 15:19 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 6:51 AM <Lewis.Hanly@microchip.com> wrote:
>
> > We had looked at the bpgpio_init, our controller is not fully
> > memory
> > mapped to support the bgpio_init() and get all routines for free.
> > While we have in/out and intr (interrupt state) 32-bit registers,
> > we
> > would not get as much free as other generic memory mapped
> > controllers.
>
> You're not really saying what the problem is?
>
> Is it that some registers are not one-bit-indexed from 0 per GPIO?
Yes some of the registers are not one-bit-indexed per GPIO and for this
reason we had not implemented bgpio_init().
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-05 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-15 12:08 [PATCH v6 0/1] Add Polarfire SoC GPIO support lewis.hanly
2022-08-15 12:08 ` lewis.hanly
2022-08-15 12:08 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] gpio: mpfs: add polarfire soc gpio support lewis.hanly
2022-08-15 12:08 ` lewis.hanly
2022-08-15 16:18 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-08-15 16:18 ` Conor.Dooley
2022-08-22 11:28 ` Linus Walleij
2022-08-22 11:28 ` Linus Walleij
2022-08-30 4:50 ` Lewis.Hanly
2022-08-30 4:50 ` Lewis.Hanly
2022-08-31 13:19 ` Linus Walleij
2022-08-31 13:19 ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-05 10:45 ` Lewis.Hanly [this message]
2022-09-05 10:45 ` Lewis.Hanly
2022-09-06 13:09 ` Linus Walleij
2022-09-06 13:09 ` Linus Walleij
2022-08-31 21:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-08-31 21:04 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-09-05 10:46 ` Lewis.Hanly
2022-09-05 10:46 ` Lewis.Hanly
2022-08-15 12:16 ` [PATCH v6 0/1] Add Polarfire SoC GPIO support Marc Zyngier
2022-08-15 12:16 ` Marc Zyngier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-18 11:08 [PATCH v6 1/1] gpio: mpfs: add polarfire soc gpio support kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=23d74882a69b39025005495886faec3e5b129ba7.camel@microchip.com \
--to=lewis.hanly@microchip.com \
--cc=Conor.Dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=Daire.McNamara@microchip.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.