From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters.
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2772927.crXiDc9cOV@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151109120720.GF963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Liviu,
Am Montag, 9. November 2015, 12:07:20 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:03:35PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, what is your suggestion regarding the patchset. I've seen David has
> > > sent Linus a pull request for 4.4-rc1 that includes it. Should we send a
> > > revert for rockchip commit and then patch later the function?
> >
> > It definitely needs to be fixed, and I'd suggest its early enough in the
> > -rc cycle (which hasn't begun yet) to simply fix drm_of_component_probe()
> > to take two compare functions.
>
> I still don't have a Rockchip board to test the patch, so I need to find out
> someone willing to test them. Mark?
I of course also have a plethora of rockchip boards, so can test stuff
as well.
Heiko
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: heiko@sntech.de (Heiko Stuebner)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters.
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2772927.crXiDc9cOV@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151109120720.GF963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Liviu,
Am Montag, 9. November 2015, 12:07:20 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:03:35PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, what is your suggestion regarding the patchset. I've seen David has
> > > sent Linus a pull request for 4.4-rc1 that includes it. Should we send a
> > > revert for rockchip commit and then patch later the function?
> >
> > It definitely needs to be fixed, and I'd suggest its early enough in the
> > -rc cycle (which hasn't begun yet) to simply fix drm_of_component_probe()
> > to take two compare functions.
>
> I still don't have a Rockchip board to test the patch, so I need to find out
> someone willing to test them. Mark?
I of course also have a plethora of rockchip boards, so can test stuff
as well.
Heiko
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Mark yao <mark.yao@rock-chips.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic probe function for component based masters.
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2772927.crXiDc9cOV@phil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151109120720.GF963@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Hi Liviu,
Am Montag, 9. November 2015, 12:07:20 schrieb Liviu Dudau:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:03:35PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:57:27AM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > > Meanwhile, what is your suggestion regarding the patchset. I've seen David has
> > > sent Linus a pull request for 4.4-rc1 that includes it. Should we send a
> > > revert for rockchip commit and then patch later the function?
> >
> > It definitely needs to be fixed, and I'd suggest its early enough in the
> > -rc cycle (which hasn't begun yet) to simply fix drm_of_component_probe()
> > to take two compare functions.
>
> I still don't have a Rockchip board to test the patch, so I need to find out
> someone willing to test them. Mark?
I of course also have a plethora of rockchip boards, so can test stuff
as well.
Heiko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-09 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 15:07 [RFC PATCH v3 0/4] drm: Cleanup probe function for component based masters Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] drm: Introduce generic " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-20 9:45 ` Eric Anholt
2015-10-20 9:45 ` Eric Anholt
2015-10-20 9:45 ` Eric Anholt
2015-11-09 9:39 ` Mark yao
2015-11-09 9:39 ` Mark yao
2015-11-09 10:53 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 10:53 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 10:53 ` Liviu Dudau
[not found] ` <20151109105316.GD963-2JSQmVVBSi7ZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-09 11:20 ` Philipp Zabel
2015-11-09 11:20 ` Philipp Zabel
2015-11-09 11:20 ` Philipp Zabel
2015-11-09 11:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:57 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:57 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:57 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 12:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 12:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 12:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 19:49 ` Heiko Stuebner [this message]
2015-11-09 19:49 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-09 19:49 ` Heiko Stuebner
2015-11-10 5:49 ` Mark yao
2015-11-10 8:53 ` Mark yao
2015-11-10 10:09 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-10 10:09 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-10 10:09 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-09 11:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-09 11:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] drm/imx: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/4] drm/rockchip: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/4] drm/armada: " Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:07 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-19 15:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 15:23 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-10-19 22:07 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-19 22:07 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-19 22:07 ` kbuild test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2772927.crXiDc9cOV@phil \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.