Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting

From: <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>
To: <will@kernel.org>, <Conor.Dooley@microchip.com>
Cc: <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>, <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	<palmer@rivosinc.com>, <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
	<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <rafael@kernel.org>,
	<Daire.McNamara@microchip.com>, <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>,
	<damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>, <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	<zong.li@sifive.com>, <kernel@esmil.dk>, <hahnjo@hahnjo.de>,
	<guoren@kernel.org>, <anup@brainfault.org>,
	<atishp@atishpatra.org>, <heiko@sntech.de>,
	<philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>, <robh@kernel.org>, <maz@kernel.org>,
	<viresh.kumar@linaro.org>, <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <Brice.Goglin@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Fix RISC-V's arch-topology reporting
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 09:20:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <28e38506-8fce-9000-c211-199a7aa69910@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220725091346.GA20370@willie-the-truck>

On 25/07/2022 10:13, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2022 at 11:22:01AM +0000, Conor.Dooley@microchip.com wrote:
>> On 15/07/2022 18:51, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Not got any feedback on the smpboot changes from the RISC-V side.
>> I tested it on polarfire, the d1 (with both SMP & !SMP set iirc)
>> & on the u540. It all looked good to me.
>>
>> I'd like to have this fixed for v5.20, but there isn't too much
>> time left before the mw. Not too sure about the cross-tree changes,
>> does it need an immutable branch or could it go through driver-core?
>> Catalin suggested removing the CC stable from patch 1/2 & adding it
>> as a dependency for the 2/2 patch - but obviously that's up to the
>> committer to sort out.
> 
> I'm finalising the arm64 queue today, so I don't really want to pull in
> additional changes beyond critical fixes at this point, I'm afraid. I was
> half-expecting a pull request from the riscv side last week but I didn't
> see anything.

Yeah, that's fair. It's late in the game for cross-tree messing.
I know Palmer has been p busy recently.

> FWIW, if there's still no movement by -rc1, then I'm happy to queue all
> of this on its own branch in the arm64 tree for 5.21.

Hopefully someone on the riscv side will have confirmed what I am doing
is sane by then.

> 
> Let me know.

I will, thanks!
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv