All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Use physical range for I/O mapping
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:30:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2943259.8mh79BAhne@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141126201758.GA19624@mithrandir>

On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:18:03 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 November 2014 17:21:37 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > -
> > > +       pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->pio, sys->io_offset);
> > >         pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->mem, sys->mem_offset);
> > >         pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->prefetch,
> > >                                 sys->mem_offset);
> > > 
> > 
> > You don't set sys->io_offset anywhere, which is a bug if you have multiple
> > instances of the PCI host in one system. In my draft patch, I was setting
> > both io_offset and mem_offset for consistency, and while mem_offset would
> > in practice be always zero (as discussed on IRC), the io_offset in fact has
> > a realistic chance of being nonzero and you should definitely set it.
> 
> I was going to do that in a follow-up patch since it isn't needed to fix
> this particular regression.

Makes sense, but then I think you can do the request_resource() and
pci_add_resource_offset() additions in the same follow-up patch as well,
and only change the computation in the regression fix.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Use physical range for I/O mapping
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 21:30:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2943259.8mh79BAhne@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141126201758.GA19624@mithrandir>

On Wednesday 26 November 2014 21:18:03 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 05:55:05PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 November 2014 17:21:37 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > -
> > > +       pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->pio, sys->io_offset);
> > >         pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->mem, sys->mem_offset);
> > >         pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pcie->prefetch,
> > >                                 sys->mem_offset);
> > > 
> > 
> > You don't set sys->io_offset anywhere, which is a bug if you have multiple
> > instances of the PCI host in one system. In my draft patch, I was setting
> > both io_offset and mem_offset for consistency, and while mem_offset would
> > in practice be always zero (as discussed on IRC), the io_offset in fact has
> > a realistic chance of being nonzero and you should definitely set it.
> 
> I was going to do that in a follow-up patch since it isn't needed to fix
> this particular regression.

Makes sense, but then I think you can do the request_resource() and
pci_add_resource_offset() additions in the same follow-up patch as well,
and only change the computation in the regression fix.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-26 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-26 16:21 [PATCH] PCI: tegra: Use physical range for I/O mapping Thierry Reding
2014-11-26 16:21 ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-26 16:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-26 16:55   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-26 20:18   ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-26 20:18     ` Thierry Reding
2014-11-26 20:30     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-11-26 20:30       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2943259.8mh79BAhne@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.