All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: sh_flctl: let flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer return 0 on success
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 22:35:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2970495.e6NA0vdFiS@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430553430-21396-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>

Hi Nicholas,

Thank you for the patch.

On Saturday 02 May 2015 09:57:07 Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> wait_for_completion_timeout() returns unsigned long not int so the check
> for <= should be == and the type unsigned long. With that fixup the return
> value of flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer can be changed to 0 for success. This
> changes the failure return value for wait_for_completion_timeout to
> -ETIMEDOUT and implicitly 0 on success by initializing ret to 0.
> The call-sites are fixed up to check for == 0 rather than > 0 as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>

I would squash patches 3/4 and 4/4 into this one, there isn't much point in 
having indentation fixes as separate patches when this one already touches the 
same lines of code. Then,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
> 
> V2: As suggested by Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>     the expected success return value is 0 so rather than just fixing up
>     wait_for_completion_timeout return handling the return value of
>     flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer should be adjusted.
> 
> call sites:
> read_fiforeg,write_ec_fiforeg assume > 0 == success
> are fixed up to check for == 0 for success
> and the comment in flctl_dma_fifo0_transfe
>         /* ret > 0 is success */
>         return ret;
> is dropped since returning 0 on success is the expected.
> 
> Patch was compile tested with ap325rxa_defconfig (implies
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_SH_FLCTL=y)
> 
> Patch is against 4.1-rc1 (localversion-next is -next-20150501)
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c |   13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> index c3ce81c..9b032dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> @@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ static int flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(struct sh_flctl
> *flctl, unsigned long *buf, dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>  	dma_cookie_t cookie = -EINVAL;
>  	uint32_t reg;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
> 
>  	if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
>  		chan = flctl->chan_fifo0_rx;
> @@ -388,13 +389,14 @@ static int flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(struct sh_flctl
> *flctl, unsigned long *buf, goto out;
>  	}
> 
> -	ret =
> +	time_left =
>  	wait_for_completion_timeout(&flctl->dma_complete,
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(3000));
> 
> -	if (ret <= 0) {
> +	if (time_left == 0) {
>  		dmaengine_terminate_all(chan);
>  		dev_err(&flctl->pdev->dev, "wait_for_completion_timeout\n");
> +		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}
> 
>  out:
> @@ -404,7 +406,6 @@ out:
> 
>  	dma_unmap_single(chan->device->dev, dma_addr, len, dir);
> 
> -	/* ret > 0 is success */
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> @@ -428,7 +429,7 @@ static void read_fiforeg(struct sh_flctl *flctl, int
> rlen, int offset)
> 
>  	/* initiate DMA transfer */
>  	if (flctl->chan_fifo0_rx && rlen >= 32 &&
> -		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) > 0)
> +		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) == 0)
>  			goto convert;	/* DMA success */
> 
>  	/* do polling transfer */
> @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static void write_ec_fiforeg(struct sh_flctl *flctl, int
> rlen,
> 
>  	/* initiate DMA transfer */
>  	if (flctl->chan_fifo0_tx && rlen >= 32 &&
> -		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) > 0)
> +		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) == 0)
>  			return;	/* DMA success */
> 
>  	/* do polling transfer */

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: sh_flctl: let flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer return 0 on success
Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 22:35:47 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2970495.e6NA0vdFiS@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1430553430-21396-1-git-send-email-hofrat@osadl.org>

Hi Nicholas,

Thank you for the patch.

On Saturday 02 May 2015 09:57:07 Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> wait_for_completion_timeout() returns unsigned long not int so the check
> for <= should be == and the type unsigned long. With that fixup the return
> value of flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer can be changed to 0 for success. This
> changes the failure return value for wait_for_completion_timeout to
> -ETIMEDOUT and implicitly 0 on success by initializing ret to 0.
> The call-sites are fixed up to check for == 0 rather than > 0 as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>

I would squash patches 3/4 and 4/4 into this one, there isn't much point in 
having indentation fixes as separate patches when this one already touches the 
same lines of code. Then,

Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>

> ---
> 
> V2: As suggested by Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
>     the expected success return value is 0 so rather than just fixing up
>     wait_for_completion_timeout return handling the return value of
>     flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer should be adjusted.
> 
> call sites:
> read_fiforeg,write_ec_fiforeg assume > 0 == success
> are fixed up to check for == 0 for success
> and the comment in flctl_dma_fifo0_transfe
>         /* ret > 0 is success */
>         return ret;
> is dropped since returning 0 on success is the expected.
> 
> Patch was compile tested with ap325rxa_defconfig (implies
> CONFIG_MTD_NAND_SH_FLCTL=y)
> 
> Patch is against 4.1-rc1 (localversion-next is -next-20150501)
> 
>  drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c |   13 +++++++------
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> index c3ce81c..9b032dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/sh_flctl.c
> @@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ static int flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(struct sh_flctl
> *flctl, unsigned long *buf, dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>  	dma_cookie_t cookie = -EINVAL;
>  	uint32_t reg;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +	unsigned long time_left;
> 
>  	if (dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE) {
>  		chan = flctl->chan_fifo0_rx;
> @@ -388,13 +389,14 @@ static int flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(struct sh_flctl
> *flctl, unsigned long *buf, goto out;
>  	}
> 
> -	ret =
> +	time_left =
>  	wait_for_completion_timeout(&flctl->dma_complete,
>  				msecs_to_jiffies(3000));
> 
> -	if (ret <= 0) {
> +	if (time_left == 0) {
>  		dmaengine_terminate_all(chan);
>  		dev_err(&flctl->pdev->dev, "wait_for_completion_timeout\n");
> +		ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
>  	}
> 
>  out:
> @@ -404,7 +406,6 @@ out:
> 
>  	dma_unmap_single(chan->device->dev, dma_addr, len, dir);
> 
> -	/* ret > 0 is success */
>  	return ret;
>  }
> 
> @@ -428,7 +429,7 @@ static void read_fiforeg(struct sh_flctl *flctl, int
> rlen, int offset)
> 
>  	/* initiate DMA transfer */
>  	if (flctl->chan_fifo0_rx && rlen >= 32 &&
> -		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) > 0)
> +		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) == 0)
>  			goto convert;	/* DMA success */
> 
>  	/* do polling transfer */
> @@ -487,7 +488,7 @@ static void write_ec_fiforeg(struct sh_flctl *flctl, int
> rlen,
> 
>  	/* initiate DMA transfer */
>  	if (flctl->chan_fifo0_tx && rlen >= 32 &&
> -		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) > 0)
> +		flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer(flctl, buf, rlen, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV) == 0)
>  			return;	/* DMA success */
> 
>  	/* do polling transfer */

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-03 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-02  7:57 [PATCH 1/4] mtd: sh_flctl: let flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer return 0 on success Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57 ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: sh_flctl: drop unused variable Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-03 19:33   ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-03 19:33     ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-04  5:17     ` Vinod Koul
2015-05-04  5:17       ` Vinod Koul
2015-05-04  6:03       ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-04  6:03         ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-04  7:53         ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-04  7:53           ` Laurent Pinchart
2015-05-10 13:49           ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-10 13:49             ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] mtd: sh_flctl: fix function parameter alignment Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] mtd: sh_flctl: fix wrapped condition alignment Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-02  7:57   ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-04  5:21   ` Vinod Koul
2015-05-04  5:21     ` Vinod Koul
2015-05-04  5:43     ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-04  5:43       ` Nicholas Mc Guire
2015-05-04  7:05     ` Joe Perches
2015-05-04  7:05       ` Joe Perches
2015-05-03 19:35 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2015-05-03 19:35   ` [PATCH 1/4] mtd: sh_flctl: let flctl_dma_fifo0_transfer return 0 on success Laurent Pinchart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2970495.e6NA0vdFiS@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.