From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, yangerkun@huawei.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, huyue2@coolpad.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] erofs: get rid of erofs_fs_context
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:39:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a7edcc0-6890-412d-b2ba-8bfa8694beeb@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e8dd4f5-29dc-9459-6ba2-f399258952dc@huawei.com>
On 4/22/24 7:31 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> Hi Jingbo,
>
> On 2024/4/22 18:25, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/24 8:36 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -761,12 +747,15 @@ static void erofs_free_dev_context(struct
>>> erofs_dev_context *devs)
>>> static void erofs_fc_free(struct fs_context *fc)
>>> {
>>> - struct erofs_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
>>> + struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = fc->s_fs_info;
>>> +
>>> + if (!sbi)
>>> + return;
>>
>> This is the only difference comparing to the original code literally.
>> Is there any chance that fc->s_fs_info can be NULL when erofs_fc_free()
>> is called?
>>
>> Otherwise looks good to me.
>>
> When sget_fc() executes successfully, fc->s_fs_info is set to NULL,
> so the following NULL pointer dereference may occur:
>
> do_new_mount
> vfs_get_tree
> erofs_fc_get_tree
> get_tree_bdev
> sget_dev
> sget_fc
> s = alloc_super
> s->s_fs_info = fc->s_fs_info;
> fc->s_fs_info = NULL;
> fill_super
> // return error
> deactivate_locked_super
> kfree(sbi);
> put_fs_context
> sbi = fc->s_fs_info
> kfree(sbi->fsid)
>
Alright, fc->s_fs_info is transferred to s->s_fs_info and set to NULL.
Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: xiang@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, huyue2@coolpad.com,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangerkun@huawei.com,
houtao1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] erofs: get rid of erofs_fs_context
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:39:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a7edcc0-6890-412d-b2ba-8bfa8694beeb@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e8dd4f5-29dc-9459-6ba2-f399258952dc@huawei.com>
On 4/22/24 7:31 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> Hi Jingbo,
>
> On 2024/4/22 18:25, Jingbo Xu wrote:
>>
>> On 4/19/24 8:36 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -761,12 +747,15 @@ static void erofs_free_dev_context(struct
>>> erofs_dev_context *devs)
>>> static void erofs_fc_free(struct fs_context *fc)
>>> {
>>> - struct erofs_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
>>> + struct erofs_sb_info *sbi = fc->s_fs_info;
>>> +
>>> + if (!sbi)
>>> + return;
>>
>> This is the only difference comparing to the original code literally.
>> Is there any chance that fc->s_fs_info can be NULL when erofs_fc_free()
>> is called?
>>
>> Otherwise looks good to me.
>>
> When sget_fc() executes successfully, fc->s_fs_info is set to NULL,
> so the following NULL pointer dereference may occur:
>
> do_new_mount
> vfs_get_tree
> erofs_fc_get_tree
> get_tree_bdev
> sget_dev
> sget_fc
> s = alloc_super
> s->s_fs_info = fc->s_fs_info;
> fc->s_fs_info = NULL;
> fill_super
> // return error
> deactivate_locked_super
> kfree(sbi);
> put_fs_context
> sbi = fc->s_fs_info
> kfree(sbi->fsid)
>
Alright, fc->s_fs_info is transferred to s->s_fs_info and set to NULL.
Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 12:36 [PATCH -next v3 0/2] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode Baokun Li via Linux-erofs
2024-04-19 12:36 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-19 12:36 ` [PATCH -next v3 1/2] erofs: get rid of erofs_fs_context Baokun Li via Linux-erofs
2024-04-19 12:36 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-22 10:25 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-04-22 10:25 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-04-22 11:31 ` Baokun Li via Linux-erofs
2024-04-22 11:31 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-22 11:39 ` Jingbo Xu [this message]
2024-04-22 11:39 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-04-23 10:37 ` Gao Xiang
2024-04-23 10:37 ` Gao Xiang
2024-04-28 7:10 ` Gao Xiang
2024-04-28 7:10 ` Gao Xiang
2024-04-28 10:00 ` Chao Yu
2024-04-28 10:00 ` Chao Yu
2024-04-19 12:36 ` [PATCH -next v3 2/2] erofs: reliably distinguish block based and fscache mode Baokun Li via Linux-erofs
2024-04-19 12:36 ` Baokun Li
2024-04-22 11:52 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-04-22 11:52 ` Jingbo Xu
2024-04-28 7:17 ` Gao Xiang
2024-04-28 7:17 ` Gao Xiang
2024-04-28 10:03 ` Chao Yu
2024-04-28 10:03 ` Chao Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a7edcc0-6890-412d-b2ba-8bfa8694beeb@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=huyue2@coolpad.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.