From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, casey@schaufler-ca.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
mvadkert@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selinux: add a skb_owned_by() hook
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 07:39:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3051849.MEUSbRlHa1@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130409.004144.1226810973846202358.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tuesday, April 09, 2013 12:41:44 AM David Miller wrote:
> It makes sure SYN/ACKs have a socket context attached to the
> packet, which only LSMs actually need.
>
> You participated in the thread where this stuff was discussed and the
> initial version of this patch was posted, so this patch, or any aspect
> of it, should not be a mystery.
Casey, and the LSM list as a whole, was not included in the entire thread as
when I first posted my original patch I believed the "mergeable" fix was going
to be self contained within the network stack.
For Casey, and others on the LSM list, here is a pointer to the original
thread which started on netdev. Enjoy.
* http://marc.info/?t=136543607500006&r=1&w=2
--
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-09 11:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 15:45 [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet Paul Moore
2013-04-08 16:14 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 17:22 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 17:40 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:26 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 18:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 20:37 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 20:44 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 20:53 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 20:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 21:09 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:14 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 21:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 3:58 ` [PATCH] selinux: add a skb_owned_by() hook Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 4:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 4:41 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 5:14 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 11:39 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2013-04-09 6:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 11:45 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 7:38 ` James Morris
2013-04-09 12:06 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 17:23 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 18:32 ` [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet Paul Moore
2013-04-08 18:32 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:15 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 21:24 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:24 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:33 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 22:01 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 22:01 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 22:08 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 23:40 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-08 23:40 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 0:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 0:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 0:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 1:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 1:24 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 1:24 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 13:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 13:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 13:33 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 13:33 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 14:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 14:52 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:52 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:05 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:05 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 15:17 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:17 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 15:57 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:57 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 16:11 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 16:11 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 16:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 17:00 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 17:00 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 17:09 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 17:10 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 14:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-04-09 14:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-04-08 19:25 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 16:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-04-08 18:12 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3051849.MEUSbRlHa1@sifl \
--to=pmoore@redhat.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mvadkert@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.