From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:03:33 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51630675.8040608@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408154519.18177.57709.stgit@localhost>
Hello.
On 04/08/2013 07:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Commit 90ba9b1986b5ac4b2d184575847147ea7c4280a2
Please also specify that commit's summary line in parens
(DaveM seems to also require double quotes inside the parens).
> converted
> tcp_make_synack() to use alloc_skb() directly instead of calling
> sock_wmalloc(), the goal being the elimination of two atomic
> operations. Unfortunately, in doing so the change broke certain
> SELinux/NetLabel configurations by no longer correctly assigning
> the sock to the outgoing packet.
>
> This patch fixes this regression by doing the skb->sk assignment
> directly inside tcp_make_synack().
>
> Reported-by: Miroslav Vadkerti <mvadkert@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-08 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-08 15:45 [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet Paul Moore
2013-04-08 16:14 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 17:22 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 17:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 17:40 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 18:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:26 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 18:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 20:37 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 20:44 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 20:53 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 20:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 21:09 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:14 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 21:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 3:58 ` [PATCH] selinux: add a skb_owned_by() hook Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 4:29 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 4:41 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 5:14 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 11:39 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 6:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 11:45 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 7:38 ` James Morris
2013-04-09 12:06 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 17:23 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 18:32 ` [PATCH] tcp: assign the sock correctly to an outgoing SYNACK packet Paul Moore
2013-04-08 18:32 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:15 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 21:24 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:24 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:33 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 22:01 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 22:01 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 22:08 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 23:40 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-08 23:40 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 0:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 0:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 0:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 1:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 1:24 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 1:24 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 13:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 13:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 13:33 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 13:33 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 14:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:19 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 14:52 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:52 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:05 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:05 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 15:17 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:17 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-09 15:57 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 15:57 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 16:11 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 16:11 ` Casey Schaufler
2013-04-09 16:56 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 17:00 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 17:00 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 17:09 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 17:10 ` David Miller
2013-04-09 14:05 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-04-09 14:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-09 14:10 ` Paul Moore
2013-04-08 21:34 ` Ben Hutchings
2013-04-08 19:25 ` David Miller
2013-04-08 16:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-04-08 18:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-04-08 18:12 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51630675.8040608@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=mvadkert@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmoore@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.