From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: only use __xipram annotation when XIP_KERNEL is set
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3185882.WT2d08mtAT@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160305002203.GF55664@google.com>
On Friday 04 March 2016 16:22:03 Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:19:21AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2016 16:02:25 Brian Norris wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:41:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > When XIP_KERNEL is enabled, some functions are defined in the .data
> > > > ELF section because we require them to be in RAM whenever we communicate
> > > > with the flash chip. However this causes problems when FTRACE is
> > > > enabled and gcc emits calls to __gnu_mcount_nc in the function
> > > > prolog:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_chip_setup':
> > > > :(.data+0x272fc): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_probe_chip':
> > > > :(.data+0x27de8): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s:70: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_probe.o] Error 1
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s:421: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o] Error 1
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s:1895: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > >
> > > Can you provide a sample .config that DOES build correctly with
> > > XIP_KERNEL enabled + this patch? My first attempt yields some other
> > > failures I don't care to fixup right now...
> > >
> > > Anyway, I don't doubt you have a good fix here, so I can probably take
> > > it. Any review from others would be welcome though.
> >
> > I found the config in the attachment in my logs.
>
> Thanks...
>
> > To get this config working, I also needed this hunk from my set of
> > old unsubmitted patches:
>
> ...but, does anyone care about XIP / MTD_XIP then, if the first two
> examples we have both have long-standing build issues?
>
Probably not. I just checked the third user (omap1), and it seems that one
has been broken since 2009 with 941132606c76 ("OMAP: Remove OMAP_IO_ADDRESS,
use OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS and OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS instead"), when Tony replaced
the inline omap_readl() with an extern function, thus breaking the
implementation of xip_irqpending() that must be inlined.
The other two have apparently been broken since 2011, by other patches
that also broke compilation.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: only use __xipram annotation when XIP_KERNEL is set
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3185882.WT2d08mtAT@wuerfel> (raw)
Message-ID: <20160305003327.70Ey65hrj37K0hGP6USI_mRpuo177Chiz0bnF8v8C_E@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160305002203.GF55664@google.com>
On Friday 04 March 2016 16:22:03 Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:19:21AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2016 16:02:25 Brian Norris wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:41:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > When XIP_KERNEL is enabled, some functions are defined in the .data
> > > > ELF section because we require them to be in RAM whenever we communicate
> > > > with the flash chip. However this causes problems when FTRACE is
> > > > enabled and gcc emits calls to __gnu_mcount_nc in the function
> > > > prolog:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_chip_setup':
> > > > :(.data+0x272fc): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_probe_chip':
> > > > :(.data+0x27de8): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s:70: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_probe.o] Error 1
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s:421: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o] Error 1
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s:1895: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > >
> > > Can you provide a sample .config that DOES build correctly with
> > > XIP_KERNEL enabled + this patch? My first attempt yields some other
> > > failures I don't care to fixup right now...
> > >
> > > Anyway, I don't doubt you have a good fix here, so I can probably take
> > > it. Any review from others would be welcome though.
> >
> > I found the config in the attachment in my logs.
>
> Thanks...
>
> > To get this config working, I also needed this hunk from my set of
> > old unsubmitted patches:
>
> ...but, does anyone care about XIP / MTD_XIP then, if the first two
> examples we have both have long-standing build issues?
>
Probably not. I just checked the third user (omap1), and it seems that one
has been broken since 2009 with 941132606c76 ("OMAP: Remove OMAP_IO_ADDRESS,
use OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS and OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS instead"), when Tony replaced
the inline omap_readl() with an extern function, thus breaking the
implementation of xip_irqpending() that must be inlined.
The other two have apparently been broken since 2011, by other patches
that also broke compilation.
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: only use __xipram annotation when XIP_KERNEL is set
Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:33:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3185882.WT2d08mtAT@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160305002203.GF55664@google.com>
On Friday 04 March 2016 16:22:03 Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 01:19:21AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 04 March 2016 16:02:25 Brian Norris wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 04:41:50PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > When XIP_KERNEL is enabled, some functions are defined in the .data
> > > > ELF section because we require them to be in RAM whenever we communicate
> > > > with the flash chip. However this causes problems when FTRACE is
> > > > enabled and gcc emits calls to __gnu_mcount_nc in the function
> > > > prolog:
> > > >
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_chip_setup':
> > > > :(.data+0x272fc): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > drivers/built-in.o: In function `cfi_probe_chip':
> > > > :(.data+0x27de8): relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_CALL against symbol `__gnu_mcount_nc' defined in .text section in arch/arm/kernel/built-in.o
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s:70: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccY172rP.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_probe.o] Error 1
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s:421: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccK4rjeO.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > > > make[5]: *** [drivers/mtd/chips/cfi_util.o] Error 1
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s:1895: Warning: ignoring changed section attributes for .data
> > > > /tmp/ccUvhCYR.s: Error: 1 warning, treating warnings as errors
> > >
> > > Can you provide a sample .config that DOES build correctly with
> > > XIP_KERNEL enabled + this patch? My first attempt yields some other
> > > failures I don't care to fixup right now...
> > >
> > > Anyway, I don't doubt you have a good fix here, so I can probably take
> > > it. Any review from others would be welcome though.
> >
> > I found the config in the attachment in my logs.
>
> Thanks...
>
> > To get this config working, I also needed this hunk from my set of
> > old unsubmitted patches:
>
> ...but, does anyone care about XIP / MTD_XIP then, if the first two
> examples we have both have long-standing build issues?
>
Probably not. I just checked the third user (omap1), and it seems that one
has been broken since 2009 with 941132606c76 ("OMAP: Remove OMAP_IO_ADDRESS,
use OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS and OMAP2_IO_ADDRESS instead"), when Tony replaced
the inline omap_readl() with an extern function, thus breaking the
implementation of xip_irqpending() that must be inlined.
The other two have apparently been broken since 2011, by other patches
that also broke compilation.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-05 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-25 15:41 [PATCH] mtd: only use __xipram annotation when XIP_KERNEL is set Arnd Bergmann
2016-01-25 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:02 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:02 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:10 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:10 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 8:45 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-03-05 8:45 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-03-06 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-06 19:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:22 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:22 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:28 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-05 0:28 ` David Woodhouse
2016-03-05 0:43 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-05 0:43 ` Brian Norris
2016-03-17 15:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-17 15:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:33 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-03-05 0:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-05 0:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-03-07 16:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-03-07 16:43 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3185882.WT2d08mtAT@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.