All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Light Hsieh (謝明燈)" <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't set RO when shutting down f2fs
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:24:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33644d72-e32f-40bf-9d81-b915b509bde9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhVrJh3rackEiIfL@google.com>

On 2024/4/10 0:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2024/4/5 3:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Shutdown does not check the error of thaw_super due to readonly, which
>>> causes a deadlock like below.
>>>
>>> f2fs_ioc_shutdown(F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC)        issue_discard_thread
>>>    - bdev_freeze
>>>     - freeze_super
>>>    - f2fs_stop_checkpoint()
>>>     - f2fs_handle_critical_error                     - sb_start_write
>>>       - set RO                                         - waiting
>>>    - bdev_thaw
>>>     - thaw_super_locked
>>>       - return -EINVAL, if sb_rdonly()
>>>    - f2fs_stop_discard_thread
>>>     -> wait for kthread_stop(discard_thread);
>>>
>>> Reported-by: "Light Hsieh (謝明燈)" <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 +++++++++--
>>>    1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> index df9765b41dac..ba6288e870c5 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> @@ -4135,9 +4135,16 @@ void f2fs_handle_critical_error(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned char reason,
>>>    	if (shutdown)
>>>    		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
>>> -	/* continue filesystem operators if errors=continue */
>>> -	if (continue_fs || f2fs_readonly(sb))
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Continue filesystem operators if errors=continue. Should not set
>>> +	 * RO by shutdown, since RO bypasses thaw_super which can hang the
>>> +	 * system.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (continue_fs || f2fs_readonly(sb) ||
>>> +				reason == STOP_CP_REASON_SHUTDOWN) {
>>> +		f2fs_warn(sbi, "Stopped filesystem due to readon: %d", reason);
>>>    		return;
>>
>> Do we need to set RO after bdev_thaw() in f2fs_do_shutdown()?
> 
> IIRC, shutdown doesn't need to set RO as we stopped the checkpoint.
> I'm more concerned on any side effect caused by this RO change.

Okay, I just wonder whether we need to follow semantics of errors=remount-ro
semantics, but it looks fine since shutdown operation simulated by ioctl
could not be treated as an inner critical error,

errors=%s                Specify f2fs behavior on critical errors. This supports modes:
                          "panic", "continue" and "remount-ro", respectively, trigger
                          panic immediately, continue without doing anything, and remount
                          the partition in read-only mode. By default it uses "continue"
                          mode.

Also, it keeps the behavior consistent w/ what we do for errors=panic case.

	if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).errors == MOUNT_ERRORS_PANIC &&
				!shutdown && !system_going_down() &&
				^^^^^^^^^
				!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN))
		panic("F2FS-fs (device %s): panic forced after error\n",
							sb->s_id);

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> +	}
>>>    	f2fs_warn(sbi, "Remounting filesystem read-only");
>>>    	/*


_______________________________________________
Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
Linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	"Light Hsieh (謝明燈)" <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't set RO when shutting down f2fs
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 09:24:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33644d72-e32f-40bf-9d81-b915b509bde9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhVrJh3rackEiIfL@google.com>

On 2024/4/10 0:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/09, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2024/4/5 3:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Shutdown does not check the error of thaw_super due to readonly, which
>>> causes a deadlock like below.
>>>
>>> f2fs_ioc_shutdown(F2FS_GOING_DOWN_FULLSYNC)        issue_discard_thread
>>>    - bdev_freeze
>>>     - freeze_super
>>>    - f2fs_stop_checkpoint()
>>>     - f2fs_handle_critical_error                     - sb_start_write
>>>       - set RO                                         - waiting
>>>    - bdev_thaw
>>>     - thaw_super_locked
>>>       - return -EINVAL, if sb_rdonly()
>>>    - f2fs_stop_discard_thread
>>>     -> wait for kthread_stop(discard_thread);
>>>
>>> Reported-by: "Light Hsieh (謝明燈)" <Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 +++++++++--
>>>    1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> index df9765b41dac..ba6288e870c5 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> @@ -4135,9 +4135,16 @@ void f2fs_handle_critical_error(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned char reason,
>>>    	if (shutdown)
>>>    		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
>>> -	/* continue filesystem operators if errors=continue */
>>> -	if (continue_fs || f2fs_readonly(sb))
>>> +	/*
>>> +	 * Continue filesystem operators if errors=continue. Should not set
>>> +	 * RO by shutdown, since RO bypasses thaw_super which can hang the
>>> +	 * system.
>>> +	 */
>>> +	if (continue_fs || f2fs_readonly(sb) ||
>>> +				reason == STOP_CP_REASON_SHUTDOWN) {
>>> +		f2fs_warn(sbi, "Stopped filesystem due to readon: %d", reason);
>>>    		return;
>>
>> Do we need to set RO after bdev_thaw() in f2fs_do_shutdown()?
> 
> IIRC, shutdown doesn't need to set RO as we stopped the checkpoint.
> I'm more concerned on any side effect caused by this RO change.

Okay, I just wonder whether we need to follow semantics of errors=remount-ro
semantics, but it looks fine since shutdown operation simulated by ioctl
could not be treated as an inner critical error,

errors=%s                Specify f2fs behavior on critical errors. This supports modes:
                          "panic", "continue" and "remount-ro", respectively, trigger
                          panic immediately, continue without doing anything, and remount
                          the partition in read-only mode. By default it uses "continue"
                          mode.

Also, it keeps the behavior consistent w/ what we do for errors=panic case.

	if (F2FS_OPTION(sbi).errors == MOUNT_ERRORS_PANIC &&
				!shutdown && !system_going_down() &&
				^^^^^^^^^
				!is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN))
		panic("F2FS-fs (device %s): panic forced after error\n",
							sb->s_id);

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> +	}
>>>    	f2fs_warn(sbi, "Remounting filesystem read-only");
>>>    	/*

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-10  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-04 19:52 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: don't set RO when shutting down f2fs Jaegeuk Kim
2024-04-04 19:52 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-04-09  3:23 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2024-04-09  3:23   ` Chao Yu
2024-04-09 16:21   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-04-09 16:21     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-04-10  1:24     ` Chao Yu [this message]
2024-04-10  1:24       ` Chao Yu
2024-04-09 14:41 ` Daeho Jeong
2024-04-09 14:41   ` Daeho Jeong
2024-04-09 16:20 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2024-04-09 16:20   ` Jaegeuk Kim
2024-04-09 23:37   ` [f2fs-dev] " Daeho Jeong
2024-04-09 23:37     ` Daeho Jeong
2024-04-10  1:25   ` Chao Yu
2024-04-10  1:25     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=33644d72-e32f-40bf-9d81-b915b509bde9@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=Light.Hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.