All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart-ryLnwIuWjnjg/C1BVhZhaw@public.gmane.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: r7s72100: add riic groups
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 22:48:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3802769.F4PZtN5om9@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387316678-10174-2-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>

Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 22:44:34 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa-jBu1N2QxHDJrcw3mvpCnnVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> 
> Tested RIIC2 on a genmai board. Other riic groups are untested but seem
> trivial enough to be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa-jBu1N2QxHDJrcw3mvpCnnVaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
> Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm-yzvPICuk2ACczHhG9Qg4qA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> 
> Note: With the current PFC driver as posted by Magnus, it needs another
> patch to work. Yet, I think this is a seperate PFC issue which needs to be
> sorted out seperately and shouldn't affect these declarations. I'll add the
> needed patch as a response to this mail.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c index a662876..2b716d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,27 @@ SCIF5(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
>  SCIF6(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
>  SCIF7(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> 
> +#define RIIC0(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic0, scl, 1, 0, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic0, sda, 1, 1, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC1(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic1, scl, 1, 2, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic1, sda, 1, 3, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC2(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic2, scl, 1, 4, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic2, sda, 1, 5, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC3(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic3, scl, 1, 6, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic3, sda, 1, 7, 1)
> +
> +RIIC0(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC1(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC2(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC3(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)

Could you please move this above the SCIF declarations (same comment below) ? 
The pfc-*.c files tend to grow pretty big, and keeping entries sorted 
alphabetically helps.

> +
>  static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] = {
>  	SCIF0(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF1(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> @@ -238,6 +259,10 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] =
> { SCIF5(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF6(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF7(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC0(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC1(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC2(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC3(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  };
> 
>  static const char * const scif0_groups[] = {
> @@ -272,6 +297,22 @@ static const char * const scif7_groups[] = {
>  	SCIF7(RZ_GROUPS)
>  };
> 
> +static const char * const riic0_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC0(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic1_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC1(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic2_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC2(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic3_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC3(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
>  static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[] = {
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif0),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif1),
> @@ -281,6 +322,10 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[]
> = { SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif5),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif6),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif7),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic0),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic1),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic2),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic3),
>  };
> 
>  #define PFC_REG(idx, name, reg)						\
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: r7s72100: add riic groups
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 21:48:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3802769.F4PZtN5om9@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387316678-10174-2-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>

Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 22:44:34 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@sang-engineering.com>
> 
> Tested RIIC2 on a genmai board. Other riic groups are untested but seem
> trivial enough to be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@sang-engineering.com>
> Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> ---
> 
> Note: With the current PFC driver as posted by Magnus, it needs another
> patch to work. Yet, I think this is a seperate PFC issue which needs to be
> sorted out seperately and shouldn't affect these declarations. I'll add the
> needed patch as a response to this mail.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c index a662876..2b716d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,27 @@ SCIF5(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
>  SCIF6(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
>  SCIF7(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> 
> +#define RIIC0(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic0, scl, 1, 0, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic0, sda, 1, 1, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC1(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic1, scl, 1, 2, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic1, sda, 1, 3, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC2(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic2, scl, 1, 4, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic2, sda, 1, 5, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC3(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic3, scl, 1, 6, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic3, sda, 1, 7, 1)
> +
> +RIIC0(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC1(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC2(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC3(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)

Could you please move this above the SCIF declarations (same comment below) ? 
The pfc-*.c files tend to grow pretty big, and keeping entries sorted 
alphabetically helps.

> +
>  static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] = {
>  	SCIF0(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF1(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> @@ -238,6 +259,10 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] > { SCIF5(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF6(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF7(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC0(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC1(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC2(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC3(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  };
> 
>  static const char * const scif0_groups[] = {
> @@ -272,6 +297,22 @@ static const char * const scif7_groups[] = {
>  	SCIF7(RZ_GROUPS)
>  };
> 
> +static const char * const riic0_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC0(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic1_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC1(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic2_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC2(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic3_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC3(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
>  static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[] = {
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif0),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif1),
> @@ -281,6 +322,10 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[]
> = { SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif5),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif6),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif7),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic0),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic1),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic2),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic3),
>  };
> 
>  #define PFC_REG(idx, name, reg)						\
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com (Laurent Pinchart)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: r7s72100: add riic groups
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2013 22:48:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3802769.F4PZtN5om9@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1387316678-10174-2-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>

Hi Wolfram,

Thank you for the patch.

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 22:44:34 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@sang-engineering.com>
> 
> Tested RIIC2 on a genmai board. Other riic groups are untested but seem
> trivial enough to be added.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@sang-engineering.com>
> Acked-by: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
> ---
> 
> Note: With the current PFC driver as posted by Magnus, it needs another
> patch to work. Yet, I think this is a seperate PFC issue which needs to be
> sorted out seperately and shouldn't affect these declarations. I'll add the
> needed patch as a response to this mail.
> 
>  drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c index a662876..2b716d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/pfc-r7s72100.c
> @@ -229,6 +229,27 @@ SCIF5(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
>  SCIF6(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
>  SCIF7(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> 
> +#define RIIC0(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic0, scl, 1, 0, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic0, sda, 1, 1, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC1(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic1, scl, 1, 2, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic1, sda, 1, 3, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC2(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic2, scl, 1, 4, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic2, sda, 1, 5, 1)
> +
> +#define RIIC3(fn)			\
> +	fn(riic3, scl, 1, 6, 1)		\
> +	fn(riic3, sda, 1, 7, 1)
> +
> +RIIC0(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC1(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC2(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)
> +RIIC3(RZ_PIN_AND_MUX)

Could you please move this above the SCIF declarations (same comment below) ? 
The pfc-*.c files tend to grow pretty big, and keeping entries sorted 
alphabetically helps.

> +
>  static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] = {
>  	SCIF0(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF1(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> @@ -238,6 +259,10 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_pin_group pinmux_groups[] =
> { SCIF5(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF6(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  	SCIF7(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC0(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC1(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC2(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
> +	RIIC3(RZ_PMX_GROUP)
>  };
> 
>  static const char * const scif0_groups[] = {
> @@ -272,6 +297,22 @@ static const char * const scif7_groups[] = {
>  	SCIF7(RZ_GROUPS)
>  };
> 
> +static const char * const riic0_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC0(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic1_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC1(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic2_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC2(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const riic3_groups[] = {
> +	RIIC3(RZ_GROUPS)
> +};
> +
>  static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[] = {
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif0),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif1),
> @@ -281,6 +322,10 @@ static const struct sh_pfc_function pinmux_functions[]
> = { SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif5),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif6),
>  	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(scif7),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic0),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic1),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic2),
> +	SH_PFC_FUNCTION(riic3),
>  };
> 
>  #define PFC_REG(idx, name, reg)						\
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-12-17 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-17 21:44 [PATCH 0/5] arm: shmobile: r7s72100: add native i2c support Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44 ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found] ` <1387316678-10174-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-17 21:44   ` [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: r7s72100: add riic groups Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44     ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44     ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]     ` <1387316678-10174-2-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-17 21:47       ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:47         ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:47         ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:48       ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-12-17 21:48         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:48         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:44   ` [PATCH 3/5] arm: shmobile: r7s72100: add nodes for i2c controllers to dtsi Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44     ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44     ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:55     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:55       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:55       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 22:13       ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 22:13         ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 22:13         ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 22:16         ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 22:16           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 22:16           ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:44   ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: riic: add driver Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44     ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44     ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18  8:42     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-12-18  8:42       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-12-18  8:42       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-12-17 21:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm: shmobile: r7s72100: add i2c clocks Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44   ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44   ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 11:38   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 11:38     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 11:38     ` Sergei Shtylyov
     [not found]     ` <52B1892B.1020806-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-18 11:43       ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 11:43         ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 11:43         ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 11:53         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 11:53           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 11:53           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 12:15           ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 12:15             ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 12:15             ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 13:49             ` Simon Horman
2013-12-18 13:49               ` Simon Horman
2013-12-18 13:49               ` Simon Horman
     [not found]               ` <20131218134914.GA32664-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-18 14:02                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 14:02                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 14:02                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
     [not found]                   ` <52B1AAE6.2020400-M4DtvfQ/ZS1MRgGoP+s0PdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-18 14:44                     ` Magnus Damm
2013-12-18 14:44                       ` Magnus Damm
2013-12-18 14:44                       ` Magnus Damm
2013-12-18 15:13                       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 15:13                         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 15:13                         ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 21:00               ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 21:00                 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-18 21:00                 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm: shmobile: genmai: adapt dts to use native i2c driver Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44   ` Wolfram Sang
2013-12-17 21:44   ` Wolfram Sang
     [not found]   ` <1387316678-10174-5-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-17 21:57     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:57       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-17 21:57       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-12-18 11:41   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 11:41     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-12-18 11:41     ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3802769.F4PZtN5om9@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart-rylnwiuwjnjg/c1bvhzhaw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.