From: Harsh Prateek Bora <harshpb@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Cc: "Caleb Schlossin" <calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>,
"Frédéric Barrat" <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>,
"Daniel Henrique Barboza" <danielhb413@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/10] ppc/pnv: Extend chip_pir class method to TIR as well
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 14:02:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39e4ac93-256b-424b-8ecb-7ed87afeb048@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240526122612.473476-6-npiggin@gmail.com>
On 5/26/24 17:56, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> The chip_pir chip class method allows the platform to set the PIR
> processor identification register. Extend this to a more general
> ID function which also allows the TIR to be set. This is in
> preparation for "big core", which is a more complicated topology
> of cores and threads.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h | 3 +-
> hw/ppc/pnv.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> hw/ppc/pnv_core.c | 10 ++++---
> 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h
> index 8589f3291e..679723926a 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_chip.h
> @@ -147,7 +147,8 @@ struct PnvChipClass {
>
> DeviceRealize parent_realize;
>
> - uint32_t (*chip_pir)(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id, uint32_t thread_id);
> + void (*processor_id)(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id, uint32_t thread_id,
> + uint32_t *pir, uint32_t *tir);
Should it be named get_chip_core_thread_regs() ?
> void (*intc_create)(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp);
> void (*intc_reset)(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu);
> void (*intc_destroy)(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu);
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index a706de2e36..7d062ec16c 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int pnv_dt_core(PnvChip *chip, PnvCore *pc, void *fdt)
> PnvChipClass *pnv_cc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
> g_autofree uint32_t *servers_prop = g_new(uint32_t, smt_threads);
> int i;
> - uint32_t pir;
> + uint32_t pir, tir;
> uint32_t segs[] = {cpu_to_be32(28), cpu_to_be32(40),
> 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff};
> uint32_t tbfreq = PNV_TIMEBASE_FREQ;
> @@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ static int pnv_dt_core(PnvChip *chip, PnvCore *pc, void *fdt)
> char *nodename;
> int cpus_offset = get_cpus_node(fdt);
>
> - pir = pnv_cc->chip_pir(chip, pc->hwid, 0);
> + pnv_cc->processor_id(chip, pc->hwid, 0, &pir, &tir);
As a generic helper API and potentially expandable, it should allow
passing NULL for registers whose values are not really sought to avoid
having to create un-necessary local variables by the caller.
regards,
Harsh
>
> nodename = g_strdup_printf("%s@%x", dc->fw_name, pir);
> offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, cpus_offset, nodename);
> @@ -237,7 +237,8 @@ static int pnv_dt_core(PnvChip *chip, PnvCore *pc, void *fdt)
>
> /* Build interrupt servers properties */
> for (i = 0; i < smt_threads; i++) {
> - servers_prop[i] = cpu_to_be32(pnv_cc->chip_pir(chip, pc->hwid, i));
> + pnv_cc->processor_id(chip, pc->hwid, i, &pir, &tir);
> + servers_prop[i] = cpu_to_be32(pir);
> }
> _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,ppc-interrupt-server#s",
> servers_prop, sizeof(*servers_prop) * smt_threads)));
> @@ -249,14 +250,17 @@ static void pnv_dt_icp(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, uint32_t hwid,
> uint32_t nr_threads)
> {
> PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(chip);
> - uint32_t pir = pcc->chip_pir(chip, hwid, 0);
> - uint64_t addr = PNV_ICP_BASE(chip) | (pir << 12);
> + uint32_t pir, tir;
> + uint64_t addr;
> char *name;
> const char compat[] = "IBM,power8-icp\0IBM,ppc-xicp";
> uint32_t irange[2], i, rsize;
> uint64_t *reg;
> int offset;
>
> + pcc->processor_id(chip, hwid, 0, &pir, &tir);
> + addr = PNV_ICP_BASE(chip) | (pir << 12);
> +
> irange[0] = cpu_to_be32(pir);
> irange[1] = cpu_to_be32(nr_threads);
>
> @@ -1104,10 +1108,12 @@ static void pnv_power10_init(MachineState *machine)
> * 25:28 Core number
> * 29:31 Thread ID
> */
> -static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p8(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id,
> - uint32_t thread_id)
> +static void pnv_processor_id_p8(PnvChip *chip,
> + uint32_t core_id, uint32_t thread_id,
> + uint32_t *pir, uint32_t *tir)
> {
> - return (chip->chip_id << 7) | (core_id << 3) | thread_id;
> + *pir = (chip->chip_id << 7) | (core_id << 3) | thread_id;
> + *tir = thread_id;
> }
>
> static void pnv_chip_power8_intc_create(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> @@ -1159,15 +1165,17 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_intc_print_info(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> *
> * We only care about the lower bits. uint32_t is fine for the moment.
> */
> -static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id,
> - uint32_t thread_id)
> +static void pnv_processor_id_p9(PnvChip *chip,
> + uint32_t core_id, uint32_t thread_id,
> + uint32_t *pir, uint32_t *tir)
> {
> if (chip->nr_threads == 8) {
> - return (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((thread_id & 1) << 2) | (core_id << 3) |
> + *pir = (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((thread_id & 1) << 2) | (core_id << 3) |
> (thread_id >> 1);
> } else {
> - return (chip->chip_id << 8) | (core_id << 2) | thread_id;
> + *pir = (chip->chip_id << 8) | (core_id << 2) | thread_id;
> }
> + *tir = thread_id;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1181,15 +1189,17 @@ static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p9(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id,
> *
> * We only care about the lower bits. uint32_t is fine for the moment.
> */
> -static uint32_t pnv_chip_pir_p10(PnvChip *chip, uint32_t core_id,
> - uint32_t thread_id)
> +static void pnv_processor_id_p10(PnvChip *chip,
> + uint32_t core_id, uint32_t thread_id,
> + uint32_t *pir, uint32_t *tir)
> {
> if (chip->nr_threads == 8) {
> - return (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((core_id / 4) << 4) |
> - ((core_id % 2) << 3) | thread_id;
> + *pir = (chip->chip_id << 8) | ((core_id / 4) << 4) |
> + ((core_id % 2) << 3) | thread_id;
> } else {
> - return (chip->chip_id << 8) | (core_id << 2) | thread_id;
> + *pir = (chip->chip_id << 8) | (core_id << 2) | thread_id;
> }
> + *tir = thread_id;
> }
>
> static void pnv_chip_power9_intc_create(PnvChip *chip, PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> @@ -1368,8 +1378,11 @@ static void pnv_chip_icp_realize(Pnv8Chip *chip8, Error **errp)
> int core_hwid = CPU_CORE(pnv_core)->core_id;
>
> for (j = 0; j < CPU_CORE(pnv_core)->nr_threads; j++) {
> - uint32_t pir = pcc->chip_pir(chip, core_hwid, j);
> - PnvICPState *icp = PNV_ICP(xics_icp_get(chip8->xics, pir));
> + uint32_t pir, tir;
> + PnvICPState *icp;
> +
> + pcc->processor_id(chip, core_hwid, j, &pir, &tir);
> + icp = PNV_ICP(xics_icp_get(chip8->xics, pir));
>
> memory_region_add_subregion(&chip8->icp_mmio, pir << 12,
> &icp->mmio);
> @@ -1481,7 +1494,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8e_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x221ef04980000000ull; /* P8 Murano DD2.1 */
> k->cores_mask = POWER8E_CORE_MASK;
> k->num_phbs = 3;
> - k->chip_pir = pnv_chip_pir_p8;
> + k->processor_id = pnv_processor_id_p8;
> k->intc_create = pnv_chip_power8_intc_create;
> k->intc_reset = pnv_chip_power8_intc_reset;
> k->intc_destroy = pnv_chip_power8_intc_destroy;
> @@ -1505,7 +1518,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220ea04980000000ull; /* P8 Venice DD2.0 */
> k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
> k->num_phbs = 3;
> - k->chip_pir = pnv_chip_pir_p8;
> + k->processor_id = pnv_processor_id_p8;
> k->intc_create = pnv_chip_power8_intc_create;
> k->intc_reset = pnv_chip_power8_intc_reset;
> k->intc_destroy = pnv_chip_power8_intc_destroy;
> @@ -1529,7 +1542,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8nvl_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x120d304980000000ull; /* P8 Naples DD1.0 */
> k->cores_mask = POWER8_CORE_MASK;
> k->num_phbs = 4;
> - k->chip_pir = pnv_chip_pir_p8;
> + k->processor_id = pnv_processor_id_p8;
> k->intc_create = pnv_chip_power8_intc_create;
> k->intc_reset = pnv_chip_power8_intc_reset;
> k->intc_destroy = pnv_chip_power8_intc_destroy;
> @@ -1802,7 +1815,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>
> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x220d104900008000ull; /* P9 Nimbus DD2.0 */
> k->cores_mask = POWER9_CORE_MASK;
> - k->chip_pir = pnv_chip_pir_p9;
> + k->processor_id = pnv_processor_id_p9;
> k->intc_create = pnv_chip_power9_intc_create;
> k->intc_reset = pnv_chip_power9_intc_reset;
> k->intc_destroy = pnv_chip_power9_intc_destroy;
> @@ -2114,7 +2127,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power10_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>
> k->chip_cfam_id = 0x120da04900008000ull; /* P10 DD1.0 (with NX) */
> k->cores_mask = POWER10_CORE_MASK;
> - k->chip_pir = pnv_chip_pir_p10;
> + k->processor_id = pnv_processor_id_p10;
> k->intc_create = pnv_chip_power10_intc_create;
> k->intc_reset = pnv_chip_power10_intc_reset;
> k->intc_destroy = pnv_chip_power10_intc_destroy;
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> index 7b0ea7812b..9b5edd9e48 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_core.c
> @@ -228,8 +228,9 @@ static void pnv_core_cpu_realize(PnvCore *pc, PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp,
> PnvCPUState *pnv_cpu = pnv_cpu_state(cpu);
> CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> int core_hwid;
> - ppc_spr_t *pir = &env->spr_cb[SPR_PIR];
> - ppc_spr_t *tir = &env->spr_cb[SPR_TIR];
> + ppc_spr_t *pir_spr = &env->spr_cb[SPR_PIR];
> + ppc_spr_t *tir_spr = &env->spr_cb[SPR_TIR];
> + uint32_t pir, tir;
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> PnvChipClass *pcc = PNV_CHIP_GET_CLASS(pc->chip);
>
> @@ -247,8 +248,9 @@ static void pnv_core_cpu_realize(PnvCore *pc, PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp,
>
> core_hwid = object_property_get_uint(OBJECT(pc), "hwid", &error_abort);
>
> - tir->default_value = thread_index;
> - pir->default_value = pcc->chip_pir(pc->chip, core_hwid, thread_index);
> + pcc->processor_id(pc->chip, core_hwid, thread_index, &pir, &tir);
> + pir_spr->default_value = pir;
> + tir_spr->default_value = tir;
>
> /* Set time-base frequency to 512 MHz */
> cpu_ppc_tb_init(env, PNV_TIMEBASE_FREQ);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-28 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-26 12:26 [RFC PATCH 00/10] ppc/pnv: Better big-core model, lpar-per-core, PC unit Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] ppc/pnv: Add pointer from PnvCPUState to PnvCore Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-27 15:23 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-28 6:19 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] ppc/pnv: Move timebase state into PnvCore Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 6:28 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-28 7:52 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-29 0:19 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] target/ppc: Improve SPR indirect registers Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 6:50 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-29 0:13 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] ppc/pnv: specialise init for powernv8/9/10 machines Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 7:10 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-28 7:45 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-29 0:18 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] ppc/pnv: Extend chip_pir class method to TIR as well Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 8:32 ` Harsh Prateek Bora [this message]
2024-05-29 0:24 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-29 6:30 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-30 6:38 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-30 6:42 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] ppc: Add a core_index to CPUPPCState for SMT vCPUs Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 8:48 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-28 8:52 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-29 0:28 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] target/ppc: Add helpers to check for SMT sibling threads Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 9:16 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-29 0:31 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-29 6:34 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-30 6:38 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] ppc/pnv: Invert the design for big-core machine modelling Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-29 6:57 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-30 6:52 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-30 7:46 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-06-03 5:22 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-29 10:49 ` Harsh Prateek Bora
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] ppc/pnv: Implement POWER10 PC xscom registers for direct controls Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-29 7:00 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-30 6:53 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-26 12:26 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] ppc/pnv: Add an LPAR per core machine option Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-29 7:02 ` Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-27 6:25 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] ppc/pnv: Better big-core model, lpar-per-core, PC unit Cédric Le Goater
2024-05-27 7:32 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-27 7:36 ` Cédric Le Goater
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39e4ac93-256b-424b-8ecb-7ed87afeb048@linux.ibm.com \
--to=harshpb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=calebs@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=clg@kaod.org \
--cc=danielhb413@gmail.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.