* pcnet32.c bug?
@ 2002-05-29 10:46 Brian Murphy
2002-05-29 14:43 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
2002-05-30 16:45 ` William Jhun
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Brian Murphy @ 2002-05-29 10:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mips
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 203 bytes --]
If I don't apply the following patch to pcnet32.c then the network
connection
on my vr5000 box is extremely jerky. It also seems quite sensible to have a
dma sync operation here.
any comments?
/Brian
[-- Attachment #2: pcnet32.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 518 bytes --]
--- drivers/net/pcnet32.c 19 Mar 2002 16:40:55 -0000 1.1.1.1.2.1.2.6
+++ drivers/net/pcnet32.c 29 May 2002 09:57:33 -0000 1.13.4.2
@@ -1343,6 +1351,10 @@
if (!rx_in_place) {
skb_reserve(skb,2); /* 16 byte align */
skb_put(skb,pkt_len); /* Make room */
+ pci_dma_sync_single(lp->pci_dev,
+ lp->rx_skbuff[entry]->tail,
+ pkt_len,
+ PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
eth_copy_and_sum(skb,
(unsigned char *)(lp->rx_skbuff[entry]->tail),
pkt_len,0);
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: pcnet32.c bug?
2002-05-29 10:46 pcnet32.c bug? Brian Murphy
@ 2002-05-29 14:43 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
2002-05-30 16:45 ` William Jhun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Paul Herbert @ 2002-05-29 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Murphy, linux-mips
Yes, this fix is correct... I made the same patch locally... sorry we
haven't submited it yet... turns out we've dropeed this one from our
own latest sources; thanks for the reminder. :-)
Note that there is another problem with cache line invalidation and
the use of pci_dma_sync_single(), where one can get stale entries in
the cache when the buffer is next re-used for DMA.
My co-worker Will Jhun <mailto:wjhun@ayrnetworks.com> just sent
e-mail on the subject of problems with the cache invalidation
routines last Saturday, with Message-ID:
<20020525131806.A4073@ayrnetworks.com>
Kevin
At 12:46 PM +0200 5/29/02, Brian Murphy wrote:
>If I don't apply the following patch to pcnet32.c then the network connection
>on my vr5000 box is extremely jerky. It also seems quite sensible to have a
>dma sync operation here.
>
>any comments?
>
>/Brian
>
>
>--- drivers/net/pcnet32.c 19 Mar 2002 16:40:55 -0000 1.1.1.1.2.1.2.6
>+++ drivers/net/pcnet32.c 29 May 2002 09:57:33 -0000 1.13.4.2
>@@ -1343,6 +1351,10 @@
> if (!rx_in_place) {
> skb_reserve(skb,2); /* 16 byte align */
> skb_put(skb,pkt_len); /* Make room */
>+ pci_dma_sync_single(lp->pci_dev,
>+ lp->rx_skbuff[entry]->tail,
>+ pkt_len,
>+ PCI_DMA_FROMDEVICE);
> eth_copy_and_sum(skb,
> (unsigned char
>*)(lp->rx_skbuff[entry]->tail),
> pkt_len,0);
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: pcnet32.c bug?
2002-05-29 10:46 pcnet32.c bug? Brian Murphy
2002-05-29 14:43 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
@ 2002-05-30 16:45 ` William Jhun
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Jhun @ 2002-05-30 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brian Murphy; +Cc: linux-mips
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:46:57PM +0200, Brian Murphy wrote:
> If I don't apply the following patch to pcnet32.c then the network
> connection
> on my vr5000 box is extremely jerky. It also seems quite sensible to have a
> dma sync operation here.
Yes, that should be there by all means. We had to add that exact same
line to get our pcnet32 working on MIPS.
Thanks,
William
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-30 16:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-05-29 10:46 pcnet32.c bug? Brian Murphy
2002-05-29 14:43 ` Kevin Paul Herbert
2002-05-30 16:45 ` William Jhun
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.