From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:11:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB5A2E6.6000305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210221514430.1648-100000@duckman.distro.conecti va>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave McCracken wrote:
> 3) The current large page implementation is only for applications
> that want anonymous *non-pageable* shared memory. Shared page
> tables reduce resource usage for any shared area that's mapped
> at a common address and is large enough to span entire pte pages.
Does this happen automatically (i.e., without modifying th emmap call)?
In any case, a system using prelinking will likely have all users of a
DSO mapping the DSO at the same address. Will a system benefit in this
case? If not directly, perhaps with some help from ld.so since we do
know when we expect the same is used everywhere.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9taLn2ijCOnn/RHQRAgJ6AJ9AzHCX3NrpZPpGUF9XIQYPdX2NPQCgw7BP
6fIfDzEvsxbGvVtoUX76aAw=
=LKpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
To: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 12:11:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3DB5A2E6.6000305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210221514430.1648-100000@duckman.distro.conecti va>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Dave McCracken wrote:
> 3) The current large page implementation is only for applications
> that want anonymous *non-pageable* shared memory. Shared page
> tables reduce resource usage for any shared area that's mapped
> at a common address and is large enough to span entire pte pages.
Does this happen automatically (i.e., without modifying th emmap call)?
In any case, a system using prelinking will likely have all users of a
DSO mapping the DSO at the same address. Will a system benefit in this
case? If not directly, perhaps with some help from ld.so since we do
know when we expect the same is used everywhere.
- --
- --------------. ,-. 444 Castro Street
Ulrich Drepper \ ,-----------------' \ Mountain View, CA 94041 USA
Red Hat `--' drepper at redhat.com `---------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9taLn2ijCOnn/RHQRAgJ6AJ9AzHCX3NrpZPpGUF9XIQYPdX2NPQCgw7BP
6fIfDzEvsxbGvVtoUX76aAw=
=LKpP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-22 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 23:06 [PATCH 2.5.43-mm2] New shared page table patch Dave McCracken
2002-10-19 1:32 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-10-19 1:32 ` Ed Tomlinson
2002-10-19 19:17 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-19 19:36 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-19 19:36 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-20 4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-20 4:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-20 6:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-20 6:18 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-21 14:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-21 14:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-21 15:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-21 15:21 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 3:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-22 3:54 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-10-22 5:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 5:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 16:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 16:09 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 16:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 16:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 18:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 18:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 19:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 19:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 19:21 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 19:21 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 10:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 10:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 14:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-24 14:22 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-24 14:38 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 14:38 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-24 14:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-24 14:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-25 17:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-25 17:31 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 10:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-24 10:42 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 17:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:19 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 17:36 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 17:45 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:45 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 17:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 17:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 18:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 18:01 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 19:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-10-22 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 21:33 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 21:33 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 18:22 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 18:47 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:47 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:55 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 18:55 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:27 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:27 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2002-10-22 19:56 ` Arjan van de Ven
2002-10-22 14:26 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 14:26 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 17:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 17:15 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-22 18:36 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 18:36 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 18:49 ` Andrew Morton
2002-10-22 19:06 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:06 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Dave McCracken
2002-10-23 3:03 ` Andi Kleen
2002-10-23 3:10 ` Rik van Riel
2002-10-23 17:49 ` Gerrit Huizenga
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0210221514430.1648-100000@duckman.distro.conecti va>
2002-10-22 19:11 ` Ulrich Drepper [this message]
2002-10-22 19:11 ` Ulrich Drepper
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 19:29 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:45 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 18:45 ` Gerrit Huizenga
2002-10-22 17:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-10-22 17:54 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3DB5A2E6.6000305@redhat.com \
--to=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=dmccr@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.