Re: extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch

[Friedrich Lobenstock <fl@fl.priv.at>]

Harald Welte wrote:
> 
> actually, _with_ the '//' in front, it accepts packets with broken
> checksums.  If you remove the '//' in front, it will not consider
> packets with broken checksums.
> 
> So W2k should work with the shipped patch ! (IIRC, it works in both
> cases)
> 

So I conclude that there is not a W2k at the other side (I missinterpreted
the comment ion the patch the other way round) because I needed to remove
the '//' to get it working. But when I ask the people what they've got
as PPTP-Server they tell me it's a W2k server.

I'm using the patch that's in pom-20030107. Could that make a difference?

As a side note, I do the following:
  PPTP-Client --> Devil-Linux-Firewall -->...Internet....--> PPTP-Server

At least it works now but it looks like a mistery now.

-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock