From: Friedrich Lobenstock <fl@fl.priv.at>
To: Netfilter Development Mailinglist <netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
Subject: Re: extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:40:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3E96F002.5000700@fl.priv.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0304110659110.12367-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Ilguiz Latypov wrote:
>
> Are you connecting to the Windows server from the Linux machine where PPTP
> connection tracking modules are loaded?
No. It looks like this:
Windows-PC ---------> Linux Firewall --------------> Windows Server
PPTP-Client connection tracking PPTP-Server
private IP private official
IP IP
> If this is true, you would be affected by the modules' rewriting of call
> IDs in one direction only when you were running the unmodified version.
I don't see a connection to a bad checksum here?
>
> To be able to connect from such Linux machine to another PPTP server, you
> need to apply the pending local NAT patch from the netfilter patch-o-matic
> and enable the CONFIG_NF_NAT_LOCAL option in the kernel.
>
> There would be nothing Windows specific in this case.
I don't think that I need the local nat stuff, do I?
PS: Can I tell the runme script of patch-o-matic to list all applied
patches? As far as I know it only shows the applied patches when you
tell it to apply some patches, but I can not export this list to a file.
--
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl@fl.priv.at
____________________________________________________________________
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-11 16:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.GSO.4.03.10304092023000.11290-100000@shemp.vdata.com>
2003-04-10 13:28 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Friedrich Lobenstock
2003-04-10 20:11 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Jeff Hall
2003-04-11 10:48 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Friedrich Lobenstock
2003-04-11 11:09 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Ilguiz Latypov
2003-04-11 16:40 ` Friedrich Lobenstock [this message]
2003-04-11 17:00 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Martin Josefsson
2003-04-11 19:42 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Martin Josefsson
2003-04-11 21:08 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Friedrich Lobenstock
2003-04-11 19:12 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Ilguiz Latypov
2003-04-11 21:26 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Friedrich Lobenstock
[not found] <3E8832B4.8030901@fl.priv.at>
2003-03-31 12:31 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Harald Welte
2003-03-31 12:44 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Friedrich Lobenstock
2003-03-31 13:07 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Harald Welte
2003-04-01 19:37 ` extra/pptp-conntrack-nat.patch Friedrich Lobenstock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3E96F002.5000700@fl.priv.at \
--to=fl@fl.priv.at \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.