From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@myrealbox.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm9
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:47:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ED0F38C.5020203@myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200305251456.39404.rudmer@legolas.dynup.net
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Sunday 25 May 2003 13:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>. 2.5.69-mm9 is not for the timid. It includes extensive changes to the
>> ext3 filesystem and the JBD layer. It withstood an hour of testing on my
>> 4-way, but it probably has a couple of holes still.
>
>
> there seems to be no problem, it survives a kernel compile.
> Only the patch for fs/buffer.c seems to be reverted, it was there in -mm8
> (original patch by wli, adjusted to cleanly apply against -mm9)
>
> Rudmer
>
It looks like he "silently" updated aio-06-bread_wq-fix.patch with an
additional fix, but it overwrote the existing diffs in that file.
Cheers,
Nicholas
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicholas Wourms <nwourms@myrealbox.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.69-mm9
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 12:47:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ED0F38C.5020203@myrealbox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200305251456.39404.rudmer@legolas.dynup.net
Rudmer van Dijk wrote:
> On Sunday 25 May 2003 13:27, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>>. 2.5.69-mm9 is not for the timid. It includes extensive changes to the
>> ext3 filesystem and the JBD layer. It withstood an hour of testing on my
>> 4-way, but it probably has a couple of holes still.
>
>
> there seems to be no problem, it survives a kernel compile.
> Only the patch for fs/buffer.c seems to be reverted, it was there in -mm8
> (original patch by wli, adjusted to cleanly apply against -mm9)
>
> Rudmer
>
It looks like he "silently" updated aio-06-bread_wq-fix.patch with an
additional fix, but it overwrote the existing diffs in that file.
Cheers,
Nicholas
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-25 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-25 11:27 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 11:27 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 12:50 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Daniele Bellucci
2003-05-25 12:56 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Rudmer van Dijk
2003-05-25 12:56 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Rudmer van Dijk
2003-05-25 13:58 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Ed Sweetman
2003-05-25 14:07 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Ed Sweetman
2003-05-25 20:06 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 20:06 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 20:29 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Adrian Bunk
2003-05-25 20:29 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Adrian Bunk
2003-05-25 16:47 ` Nicholas Wourms [this message]
2003-05-25 16:47 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Nicholas Wourms
2003-05-25 17:06 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Adam Kropelin
2003-05-25 17:06 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Adam Kropelin
2003-05-25 20:54 ` 2.5.69-mm9: undefined references to `router_devlist' Adrian Bunk
2003-05-26 13:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-05-27 2:34 ` [PATCH] wanrouter: fix bug introduced by latest namespace fix Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2003-05-27 7:08 ` David S. Miller
2003-05-25 21:56 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-05-25 22:48 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 22:48 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 23:16 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Neil Brown
2003-05-25 23:16 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Neil Brown
2003-05-25 23:19 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Trond Myklebust
2003-05-25 23:19 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Trond Myklebust
2003-05-26 18:30 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Daniele Bellucci
2003-05-26 19:20 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Daniele Bellucci
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-25 15:19 2.5.69-mm9 Alistair J Strachan
2003-05-25 20:15 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
2003-05-25 20:35 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Alistair J Strachan
2003-05-25 20:51 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Mike Fedyk
2003-05-25 20:55 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Andrew Morton
[not found] <20030525172746.43b9866d.akpm@digeo.com>
[not found] ` <20030529204324.GF25560@kroah.com>
2003-05-29 23:48 ` 2.5.69-mm9 Alistair J Strachan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3ED0F38C.5020203@myrealbox.com \
--to=nwourms@myrealbox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.