* LVM(1|2) vs EVMS
@ 2003-08-14 22:40 Jose Alberto Guzman
2003-08-15 12:17 ` Oleg Drokin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jose Alberto Guzman @ 2003-08-14 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-list
What would be the recommended volume management system for an smp
production server running oracle 8i (later 9i) on 2.4.20 or 2.4.21
debian gnu/linux with reiserfs: lvm1, lvm2 or evms ??
Solid stability under heavy load and snapshots are the main needed
features.
What would you suggest?
José
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: LVM(1|2) vs EVMS
2003-08-14 22:40 LVM(1|2) vs EVMS Jose Alberto Guzman
@ 2003-08-15 12:17 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-15 18:38 ` Jose Alberto Guzman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Drokin @ 2003-08-15 12:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jose Alberto Guzman; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Hello!
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:40:30PM -0500, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
> What would be the recommended volume management system for an smp
> production server running oracle 8i (later 9i) on 2.4.20 or 2.4.21
> debian gnu/linux with reiserfs: lvm1, lvm2 or evms ??
> Solid stability under heavy load and snapshots are the main needed
> features.
> What would you suggest?
LVM1 is part of the kernel for a lot of time and is greatly tested,
so I guess it will be the best choice in your case.
Bye,
Oleg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: LVM(1|2) vs EVMS
2003-08-15 12:17 ` Oleg Drokin
@ 2003-08-15 18:38 ` Jose Alberto Guzman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jose Alberto Guzman @ 2003-08-15 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Drokin; +Cc: reiserfs-list
Oleg Drokin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 05:40:30PM -0500, Jose Alberto Guzman wrote:
>
>> What would be the recommended volume management system for an smp
>>production server running oracle 8i (later 9i) on 2.4.20 or 2.4.21
>>debian gnu/linux with reiserfs: lvm1, lvm2 or evms ??
>> Solid stability under heavy load and snapshots are the main needed
>>features.
>> What would you suggest?
>
>
> LVM1 is part of the kernel for a lot of time and is greatly tested,
> so I guess it will be the best choice in your case.
>
> Bye,
> Oleg
Thanks for your suggestion Oleg, (and Thunder who replied personally).
I suppose that the patches at:
ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiserfs-for-2.4/2.4.20-pending
would make a 2.4.20 box more stable with lvm 1 ?? are there any
other recommended patches around??
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-15 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-14 22:40 LVM(1|2) vs EVMS Jose Alberto Guzman
2003-08-15 12:17 ` Oleg Drokin
2003-08-15 18:38 ` Jose Alberto Guzman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.