[uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Vincent]

i was running 2.4.20-um6. i just compiled 2.4.22-1 and 2.4.22-2 but they
both having the following errors. i am running on redhat 2.4.21-19 host
with skas patch.

VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly.
Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch
In interrupt handler - not syncing

i saw a few post regarding this kernel panic, any patch available?

rgds,
 Vincent


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

Vincent wrote:
> i saw a few post regarding this kernel panic, any patch available?

I'm still working with Jeff to debug the problem.

David



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

Vincent wrote:
> sorry for bothering, just wondering if you able to get rid of the devfs
> compile error for 2.4.22-4?

Hrm, seems to compile here just fine.

> do you able to get 2.4.22-3 compile with highmem support? since i've been
> having problem compiling with highmem support since 2.4.21

No, it seems broken.


David

-- 
David Coulson                                    email: d@vidcoulson.com
Linux Developer /                          web: http://davidcoulson.net/
Network Engineer                                   phone: (216) 533-6967



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

[uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

I'm having a few issues with my current UML kernels -

/dev/ubd/2: recovering journal
Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch
In interrupt handler - not syncing

Anyone seen this before?

David

-- 
David Coulson                                    email: d@vidcoulson.com
Linux Developer /                          web: http://davidcoulson.net/
Network Engineer                                   phone: (216) 533-6967



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Adam Heath]

On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, David Coulson wrote:

> I'm having a few issues with my current UML kernels -
>
> /dev/ubd/2: recovering journal
> Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch
> In interrupt handler - not syncing

Yes.  Started seeing that today.

Here is what I have tracked down.

Host 2.4.21-1um.  UML 2.4.21-1um.
Host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.22
Host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.21-1um

All these combinations had this problem.  However, Host 2.4.21-1um, UML
2.4.20-6um and host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.20-6um ran fine.

I am not using a COW file.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

Adam Heath wrote:
> All these combinations had this problem.  However, Host 2.4.21-1um, UML
> 2.4.20-6um and host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.20-6um ran fine.

I'd bet the mmap stuff broke it - I was going to try to back out the v3 
COW stuff and mmap, but I figured that was basically -6um anyway ;-)

David

-- 
David Coulson                                    email: d@vidcoulson.com
Linux Developer /                          web: http://davidcoulson.net/
Network Engineer                                   phone: (216) 533-6967



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Jeff Dike]

adam@doogie.org said:
> All these combinations had this problem.  However, Host 2.4.21-1um,
> UML 2.4.20-6um and host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.20-6um ran fine. 

I've been playing with this quite a bit and I can't make it misbehave.  So,
I need some clues as to what you're doing that I'm not.

				Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

Jeff Dike wrote:
> I've been playing with this quite a bit and I can't make it misbehave.  So,
> I need some clues as to what you're doing that I'm not.

./linux :-)

I can give you a shell on a box that does it reliably.

David



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Jeff Dike]

david@davidcoulson.net said:
> I can give you a shell on a box that does it reliably. 

OK, send me the details...

			Jeff



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:10:55AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:

> adam@doogie.org said:
> > All these combinations had this problem.  However, Host 2.4.21-1um,
> > UML 2.4.20-6um and host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.20-6um ran fine. 
> 
> I've been playing with this quite a bit and I can't make it misbehave.  So,
> I need some clues as to what you're doing that I'm not.

Likewise.  Adam can actually reproduce this with the exact same UML binary
that I'm using (the one from my user-mode-linux .deb), but I can't reproduce
it at all.  We're also both using Debian unstable (I think), so most other
factors should be the same as well.  My host kernel is Debian's 2.4.21 with
skas3 and device-mapper.

-- 
 - mdz


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Likewise.  Adam can actually reproduce this with the exact same UML binary
> that I'm using (the one from my user-mode-linux .deb), but I can't reproduce
> it at all.  We're also both using Debian unstable (I think), so most other
> factors should be the same as well.  My host kernel is Debian's 2.4.21 with
> skas3 and device-mapper.


I'm 99% sure it's filesystem, rather than kernel, dependent. I gave Jeff 
a shell on one of my boxes, so we'll see what that turns up




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 12:53:18PM -0400, David Coulson wrote:

> Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> >Likewise.  Adam can actually reproduce this with the exact same UML binary
> >that I'm using (the one from my user-mode-linux .deb), but I can't 
> >reproduce
> >it at all.  We're also both using Debian unstable (I think), so most other
> >factors should be the same as well.  My host kernel is Debian's 2.4.21 with
> >skas3 and device-mapper.
> 
> I'm 99% sure it's filesystem, rather than kernel, dependent. I gave Jeff 
> a shell on one of my boxes, so we'll see what that turns up

Host filesystem or UML filesystem?  Adam and I were both using ext2 inside
UML when we spoke, and I'm using ext3 on the host side.

-- 
 - mdz


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[David Coulson]

Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Host filesystem or UML filesystem?  Adam and I were both using ext2 inside
> UML when we spoke, and I'm using ext3 on the host side.

Sorry, filesystem was the wrong word to use - 'image file' is more accurate.

David




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

David Coulson <david@davidcoulson.net> wrote:
>> Host filesystem or UML filesystem?  Adam and I were both using ext2 inside
>> UML when we spoke, and I'm using ext3 on the host side.
DC> Sorry, filesystem was the wrong word to use - 'image file' is more accurate.

That's how I reproduce it:
on host (underlying fs is reiserfs):
dd if=/dev/zero of=scratch bs=1024k seek=4096 count=1
./linux mem=100M ubd0=/space/green/rootfs debug xterm=rxvt ubd1=/space/green/scratch 

in uml:
# mkreiserfs /dev/ubd1
<-------------mkreiserfs, 2001------------->
reiserfsprogs 3.x.0k-pre9

mkreiserfs: Guessing about desired format.. 
mkreiserfs: Kernel 2.4.23-pre3-2um is running.
3276k will be used
Block 16 (0x6210) contains super block of format 3.5 with standard journal
Block count: 1048832
Bitmap number: 33
Blocksize: 4096
Free blocks: 1040588
Root block: 8211
Tree height: 2
Hash function used to sort names: "r5"
Objectid map size 2, max 1004
Journal parameters:
        Device [0x0]
        Magic [0x5db630ce]
        Size 8193 (including journal header) (first block 18)
        Max transaction length 1024
        Max batch size 900
        Max commit age 30
Space reserved by journal: 0
Correctness checked after mount 1
Fsck field 0x0
ATTENTION: YOU SHOULD REBOOT AFTER FDISK!
        ALL DATA WILL BE LOST ON './aaa'!
Continue (y/n):y
Initializing journal - 0%....20%....40%....60%....80%....100%

In gdb at this point:
Breakpoint 1, panic (fmt=0xa0180615 "I/O op mismatch") at panic.c:60
60              bust_spinlocks(1);
(gdb) bt
#0  panic (fmt=0xa0180615 "I/O op mismatch") at panic.c:60
#1  0xa00c92a4 in ubd_handler () at ubd_kern.c:471
#2  0xa0083510 in handle_IRQ_event (irq=4, regs=0xa01a4274, action=0xa0ab31f4)
    at irq.c:160
#3  0xa00836d5 in do_IRQ (irq=4, regs=0xa01a4274) at irq.c:323
#4  0xa0083f7f in sigio_handler (sig=29, regs=0xa01a4274) at irq_user.c:73
#5  0xa0090cc2 in sig_handler_common_tt (sig=29, sc_ptr=0xe8) at trap_user.c:37
#6  0xa008d7ab in sig_handler (sig=1, sc=
      {gs = 0, __gsh = 0, fs = 0, __fsh = 0, es = 123, __esh = 0, ds = 123, __dsh = 0, edi = 2686091136, esi = 2686074880, ebp = 2686091104, esp = 2686091076, ebx = 2686091096, edx = 2686074880, ecx = 0, eax = 4294967292, trapno = 1, err = 0, eip = 2685643674, cs = 115, __csh = 0, eflags = 582, esp_at_signal = 2686091076, ss = 123, __ssh = 0, fpstate = 0xa01a7cc8, oldmask = 134283264, cr2 = 0})
    at trap_user.c:104
#7  <signal handler called>
#8  0xa013ab9a in nanosleep () at pgtable.h:257
#9  0xa008c5f6 in idle_sleep (secs=-4) at time.c:115
#10 0xa0085ef6 in cpu_idle () at process_kern.c:206
#11 0xa000b4ae in rest_init () at init/main.c:346

(btw, did you know that to compile 2.4.22-2um with ptrace support one needs to
add "#include <errno.h>" at arch/um/kernel/tt/ptproxy/sysdep.c otherwise
it won't compile).

Host is SMP.

Hm, interesting if this one of the races I observed long time ago.

Bye,
    Oleg


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Oleg Drokin]

Hello!

Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru> wrote:
OD> Hello!

OD> David Coulson <david@davidcoulson.net> wrote:
>>> Host filesystem or UML filesystem?  Adam and I were both using ext2 inside
>>> UML when we spoke, and I'm using ext3 on the host side.
DC>> Sorry, filesystem was the wrong word to use - 'image file' is more accurate.
OD> That's how I reproduce it:

Ok, so the problem is a missed cast.
And the patch is below.

Bye,
    Oleg
--- arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c.orig	2003-09-11 16:49:48.000000000 +0400
+++ arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c	2003-09-11 18:12:10.861689280 +0400
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@
 	}
 
         req->sector += ubd_part[minor].start_sect;
-	offset = req->sector << 9;
+	offset = (__u64)req->sector << 9;
 	len = req->current_nr_sectors << 9;
 
 	io_req->fds[0] = (dev->cow.file != NULL) ? dev->cow.fd : dev->fd;


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel

Re: [uml-devel] Kernel panic: I/O op mismatch

[Adam Heath]

On Tue, 9 Sep 2003, Matt Zimmerman wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 09:10:55AM -0400, Jeff Dike wrote:
>
> > adam@doogie.org said:
> > > All these combinations had this problem.  However, Host 2.4.21-1um,
> > > UML 2.4.20-6um and host 2.4.22, UML 2.4.20-6um ran fine.
> >
> > I've been playing with this quite a bit and I can't make it misbehave.  So,
> > I need some clues as to what you're doing that I'm not.
>
> Likewise.  Adam can actually reproduce this with the exact same UML binary
> that I'm using (the one from my user-mode-linux .deb), but I can't reproduce
> it at all.  We're also both using Debian unstable (I think), so most other
> factors should be the same as well.  My host kernel is Debian's 2.4.21 with
> skas3 and device-mapper.

Well, not unstable.  The machine I was running this on is a server, not my
workstation(which tends to follow unstable, but isn't always uptodate).  The
machine that had the problems had a libc6 version of 2.3.2-5.

Unfortunately, I installed an older uml binary(2.4.20-6um), so that we could
continue to run our uml hosts on it.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel