From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: Wes Janzen <superchkn@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl>,
Norman Diamond <ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp>,
John Bradford <john@grabjohn.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nikita@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 13:04:08 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3F8BBC08.6030901@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F8BA037.9000705@sbcglobal.net>
Wes Janzen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> You have to do the math on the LBA sector numbers (subtract the
>> partition start, divide by two).
>> Also, you can use the "badblocks" program.
>>
> I think he's using reiserfs on the partition, which ASFAIK doesn't
> support marking bad sectors without some work. I tend to agree with
> namesys when they suggest just getting a new drive if it has used up
> all of its extra sectors. In my experience (admittedly limited), any
> drive which runs out of extra sectors starts to go bad in a hurry.
>
> -Wes-
>
>> Roger.
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
I think the problem is that many users don't know how to trigger the bad
sector remapping for the case where the drive can still remap, using
writes to the bad blocks, and probably our faq needs updating.
nikita, can you do that?
--
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-14 9:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-13 9:31 Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them? Norman Diamond
[not found] ` <200310131014.h9DAEwY3000241@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
2003-10-13 10:24 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-13 10:33 ` John Bradford
2003-10-13 11:30 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-13 11:58 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-10-15 10:22 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-13 12:02 ` John Bradford
2003-10-15 10:23 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-15 18:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-14 6:54 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-13 14:24 ` Chuck Campbell
2003-10-13 14:54 ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2003-10-13 16:29 ` Roger Larsson
2003-10-14 6:49 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 7:05 ` Wes Janzen
2003-10-14 7:21 ` John Bradford
2003-10-14 7:40 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 8:11 ` John Bradford
2003-10-14 8:45 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-14 9:46 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 9:57 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-14 10:10 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 10:31 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-14 10:19 ` John Bradford
[not found] ` <200310140800.h9E80BT9000815@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
[not found] ` <20031014081110.GA14418@bitwizard.nl>
2003-10-14 8:55 ` Wes Janzen
2003-10-14 10:05 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 7:24 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-14 9:04 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2003-10-15 10:23 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-15 10:39 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 9:40 ` Blockbusting news, this is important (Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?) Norman Diamond
2003-10-17 9:48 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 11:11 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-17 11:45 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 11:51 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 12:53 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 13:03 ` Russell King
2003-10-17 13:26 ` John Bradford
2003-10-19 7:50 ` Andre Hedrick
2003-10-17 13:04 ` Russell King
2003-10-17 14:09 ` Norman Diamond
2003-10-17 9:58 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-17 10:15 ` Hans Reiser
2003-10-17 10:24 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-17 10:49 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 11:09 ` Rogier Wolff
2003-10-17 11:24 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-17 19:35 ` John Bradford
2003-10-17 23:28 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-18 7:42 ` Pavel Machek
2003-10-18 8:30 ` John Bradford
2003-10-21 20:26 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-18 8:27 ` John Bradford
2003-10-18 12:02 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-10-18 16:26 ` Nuno Silva
2003-10-18 20:16 ` Krzysztof Halasa
[not found] ` <m37k33igui.fsf@defiant. <m3u166vjn0.fsf@defiant.pm.waw.pl>
2003-10-21 20:39 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-17 10:37 ` ATA Defect management John Bradford
2003-10-21 20:44 ` bill davidsen
2003-10-17 12:08 ` Blockbusting news, this is important (Re: Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them?) Justin Cormack
2003-10-21 20:12 ` bill davidsen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-10-12 8:25 Why are bad disk sectors numbered strangely, and what happens to them? Norman Diamond
2003-10-11 9:00 Norman Diamond
2003-10-11 9:39 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3F8BBC08.6030901@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl \
--cc=john@grabjohn.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndiamond@wta.att.ne.jp \
--cc=nikita@namesys.com \
--cc=superchkn@sbcglobal.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.