From: Jason Holmes <jholmes@psu.edu>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:51:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FB29D43.A618973D@psu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: shssmkttk34.fsf@charged.uio.no
Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> >>>>> " " == Jason Holmes <jholmes@psu.edu> writes:
>
> > Can someone clue me in as to why this may be happening and if
> > it's a "bug" or not?
>
> Large numbers of 'commit' operations are a typical sign of the memory
> management going wild. Have you compared this to the standard
> 2.6.0-test9 kernel?
>
> What sort of load did you otherwise have on that machine?
The machines (both client and server) are idle other than the testing
I'm doing and I'm doing only one test at a time at this point.
I did not do plain 2.6.0-test9 yet, but here is 2.6.0-test6 and
2.6.0-test9-bk17:
-- 2.6.0-test6 --
Client nfs v3:
null getattr setattr lookup access readlink
0 0% 749 0% 0 0% 130 0% 251 0% 0 0%
read write create mkdir symlink mknod
833 0% 178577 14% 24 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus
24 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 18 0% 1 0%
fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit
0 0% 3 0% 0 0% 1024801 85%
Client rpc stats:
calls retrans authrefrsh
1205411 7 0
-- 2.6.0-test9-bk17 --
Client nfs v3:
null getattr setattr lookup access readlink
0 0% 744 0% 0 0% 129 0% 252 0% 0 0%
read write create mkdir symlink mknod
873 0% 178574 14% 24 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus
24 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 18 0% 0 0%
fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit
0 0% 3 0% 0 0% 1023451 84%
Client rpc stats:
calls retrans authrefrsh
1204092 3 0
Thanks,
--
Jason Holmes
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP, Perl, XML, Java, MySQL,
WebDAV, and more! http://www.apachecon.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-12 20:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-12 18:05 2.4 vs. 2.6 nfs client performance Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 20:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-12 20:51 ` Jason Holmes [this message]
2003-11-12 21:18 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-12 21:33 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 23:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 1:20 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 2:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 14:16 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 21:55 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-14 0:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-14 18:37 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-14 21:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-16 15:54 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-13 15:56 ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 17:55 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 18:59 ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 19:09 ` Eric Whiting
2003-11-13 19:28 ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-13 19:18 ` Jason Holmes
2003-11-12 22:08 ` Eric Whiting
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-13 19:42 Duc Vianney
2003-11-13 20:02 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FB29D43.A618973D@psu.edu \
--to=jholmes@psu.edu \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.